• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Stupidest Argument of the Week

Doc91478

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
2,778
Reaction score
790
Location
North East
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
The Stupidest Argument of the Week​


https://pjmedia.com/trending/the-stupidest-argument-of-the-week/
I want to tell you about my favorite equation in the world. It goes like this: E = P × V That's read as "the expected value of an event is the value of the event times the probability the event happens." It's amazing how often that comes up – especially in discussions about insurance, computer security, and the famous wall.... Now, let us assume for the sake of argument that each illegal immigrant comes with an associated cost. That means the expected cost of illegal immigration is basically proportional to how hard it is to get into the country as an illegal immigrant.... into the country as an illegal immigrant.... Here's the fact that clearly has been kept secret from these city folk, who I'm sure have never dug so much as a post hole: digging tunnels is hard. Digging tunnels secretly is really hard. (Go watch "The Great Escape" or read about the Tunnel 57.)… Drug dealers can dig tunnels because drug dealers make lots and lots of money and so can afford to pay peónes to dig their tunnels. But then, drug dealers have enough money that they're building submarines to smuggle drugs.... And if it's harder, the likelihood of that happening is smaller. So yes, a wall will deter illegal immigration — as well as all of the other things that cross the border — even though it is possible to dig a tunnel.


~~~~~~
Hmm.... Imminent domain = red herring. 3 ft. thick wall, 10 ft. wide dirt road, maintained by others. Hell of a cattle fence. Better a wall then the illegals crossing your land or worse, you dying on your land at the hands of an illegal or dying on your land.
When it comes to fencing off the Rio Grande River Dems will note that property owners water rights may be infringed upon. However, the nice thing is that, because water rights issues already have a legal infrastructure around them, cattle watering can be taken care of. Not without cost, but not ludicrous, either. Irrigation diversions upstream can be allocated and eminent domain established.
Who owns the line? Federal government. How wide is the line? Who owns the legal access to the border? How wide is the access to the federally owned line? Can a private individual deny federal access? Red herring stands.
You know the world is upside down when Progressive Marxist Socialist Democrats worry about protecting private property rights.
 

Mach

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
23,685
Reaction score
16,860
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
The concluded your thread with your own title. Efficient.
 
Top Bottom