It seems to really trigger those with self esteem issues. It's amazing how when people support your posts you still attack themLook at the braggadocio……yet again
Only the assholes
Show the testimony/quotes then instead of just heckling. 'Till then, you're wrong.
Believe whatever you like, just like I believe that you are neither a lawyer nor a teacher.
Have you ever seen @TurtleDude present any proof for his oft repeated positive claim " Liberals support violent criminals"?Show the testimony/quotes then instead of just heckling. 'Till then, you're wrong.
Believe whatever you like, just like I believe that you are neither a lawyer nor a teacher.
well people know I am an attorney on this board-including a few who usually disagree with me. But owning a black powder pistol and a war trophy and claiming to be a gun owner is akin to owning a couple guinea pigs and claiming you are a rancherShow the testimony/quotes then instead of just heckling. 'Till then, you're wrong.
Believe whatever you like, just like I believe that you are neither a lawyer nor a teacher.
you attack and pick fights with posts/posters who are not attacking you. example, I suggested some really good parts for an AR 15 build-parts that top competition shooters use and you were insulting
How many lives have been lost because of your financial contributions to the transportation industry? Have the goalposts been moved to "support the industry" because "gun ownership" has become inconvenient for now?Diverting with another rhetorical question instead of answering the one put to you. Doesn't say much for how well you think your arguments are holding up!
How many lives have been/will be lost because of your financial support of the firearms industry? Into whose hands will that 'collection' of yours fall into after you're gone? Will you have the willpower to have them destroyed before that time comes, as a precaution against further contributions to the gun violence problem?
Back to the original unanswered question, "Where do you fall on that bell curve (of hypocrisy)?"
I disagree. The ownership of even one gun, factually makes a person a gun owner.
your point has merit but I think you understand what I am saying. There are logs of gun banners who inherited a firearm and brag about being a gun owner as if it bolsters their position. It is akin to the "Seminar posters" we used to see who would start letters to the local papers with
Yet is you, and you alone, who is the one in this GCF sub-forum, who admitted yesterday that you acted irresponsibly with a loaded firearm, when you pulled a loaded shotgun on some people partying on vacant property. Have you ever seen any other members here at DP admit to brandishing a loaded firearm irresponsibly?
normal people would say "thanks but that's out of my price range" rather than posting the nonsense you did.
Boo hoo hoo. It’s always about you.
why don't you tell us what that means-are you saying your almost 5000 posts are about a self esteem issue?
Yeah.....this 3rd grade argument has been beaten into a greasy spot for decades.2'nd Amendment
'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.'
So...what exactly is 'A well regulated Militia'?
The Militia Act of 1903
'The first section reiterates the law of 1793, that the militia shall consist of every able-bodied citizen between eighteen and forty-five, and divides the militia into two classes — the organized militia or National Guard, and the unorganized or reserve militia.
The third section defines the " organized militia " as the regu- larly enlisted, organized, and uniformed militia which shall here- after participate in the annual militia appropriation (heretofore only one million a year). It gives the President authority to fix the minimum number of enlisted men in each company.'
The Militia Act of 1903 : Parker, James : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The Militia Act of 1903 is an article from The North American Review, Volume 177. View more articles from The North American Review.View this article on...archive.org
So...there are two kinds of militia - according to US law.
The organized and the unorganized.
And since the 2'nd Amendment refers SOLELY to 'a well regulated Militia'?
Than, the 2'nd Amendment cannot POSSIBLY include the 'unorganized militia'.
It is not possible for a 'well regulated Militia' to be 'unorganized'.
And since the ONLY organized militia refers ONLY to the military?
The 2'nd Amendment does NOT include ANYONE whom is not in the military.
By law.
What did you know at 25 you didn't know at 17 that would have motivated you to have "done something different"? What, specifically, would you have done "differently"?
Police carry guns just to make themselves feel safer.
Jesus but you need to read and comprehend
what exactly is your issue?
You
you fly off the handle at stuff I post, even when I am trying to support a post you have made. You no longer post based on what I said, but post based upon the fact I said it
Pure hypocrisy.
cool story bro
What a stupid post.