• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The root of all pregnancy

Spunkylama

Requested Profile Delete. Bye
Banned
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2022
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
2,028
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
6o79kazkkbx81.jpg

 
LOL you offering yourself up or just others?

I'd certainly volunteer if it meant we could restrict abortion. Again, that's a trade I'd take in a heartbeat.

Would you take that trade?
 
Just snip it there while I work on the Kursk.
 
Maybe people ought to just be more responsible and take ownership for their actions? That would solve lots of problems.
 
I'd certainly volunteer if it meant we could restrict abortion. Again, that's a trade I'd take in a heartbeat.

Would you take that trade?
If I am not able to make my own reproductive choices nor should you.
 
How is it that if a pregnant woman decides to end the life of the human inside her it is just a choice, but if a person attacks a pregnant woman and the life of the human inside her dies, it is murder? How does this make any logical sense?
 
And as you just said, you're participating instead of just doing a drive-by and then just

the-simpsons-homer-simpson.gif
I hate the bitching that sometimes happens. Okay, you don't like the thread. Close it and read another. It's not that difficult.
 
So if we do that, can we then restrict abortion? If that's the trade, I'll definitely take it.
Could be done at birth, pretty much would eliminate the need for abortions.
 
So if we do that, can we then restrict abortion? If that's the trade, I'll definitely take it.
Just so I'm sure you understand.

You're agreeing that until and unless a male human reaches a certain possibly arbitrary level of financial stability, they must be regularly checked to be sure the vasectomy they were required to get at puberty or thereabouts hasn't fixed itself.
And in exchange, abortions are restricted to, say, only the first 2/3rds of a normal pregnancy, banned thereafter unless a medical situation where the mother will die is in play.
 
Just so I'm sure you understand.

You're agreeing that until and unless a male human reaches a certain possibly arbitrary level of financial stability, they must be regularly checked to be sure the vasectomy they were required to get at puberty or thereabouts hasn't fixed itself.
And in exchange, abortions are restricted to, say, only the first 2/3rds of a normal pregnancy, banned thereafter unless a medical situation where the mother will die is in play.
That sounds like a reasonable compromise, though I find nothing in the Constitution that would support preventing a Woman from having an abortion at any time prior to birth.
 
Maybe people ought to just be more responsible and take ownership for their actions? That would solve lots of problems.
yeah, well, we have to train our kids to think that way, and history shows we don't.
 
I'd certainly volunteer if it meant we could restrict abortion. Again, that's a trade I'd take in a heartbeat.

Would you take that trade?

The right would just find a new way to hate women, let's face it.
 
That sounds like a reasonable compromise, though I find nothing in the Constitution that would support preventing a Woman from having an abortion at any time prior to birth.
Only if you ignore the righs of the unborn child, to life and liberty.
 
Only if you ignore the righs of the unborn child, to life and liberty.
What does our Constitution have to say about Rights of the unborn?
 
Back
Top Bottom