- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I have no idea what Rich is claimingHe said that?
I have no idea what Rich is claimingHe said that?
a gang raids a store. I believe the store keeper should be able to shoot the looters. Its not shoplifting-it's looting. You should know that using force to stop looting is not the same as a sentence or a verdict. Assault is not a capital offense nor is rape but in both cases, if someone violently assaults you or tries to rape you you can shoot them and if they die. them's the breaks
Mass shooter Killings. Saw the other day a Teen shot his mom cause she didn't want him doing pot in the house. How did he get the firearm ? Mom ? Duh !!!!! Still more are killed every year by Drivers on Cell phones a Decade.
41 Years of Mass Shootings in the U.S. in One Chart
Hundreds of people have been killed in mass shootings since 1982time.com
Imagine the "Teens or Pre teens" are most dangerous predators out there. Just ask Vietnam Vets about kids. "
I have no idea what Rich is claiming
Driving and Cell phone use is a huge killer on the highways. Their even falling to their death from high places taking selfies. I had an adult step out in front of my vehicle at an intersection while on his, I had attention locked on to him before I got there by his head pointed down walking along before he stepped out. Thankfully I didn't crush him. Kids walking home from school, to school Busses absorbed in games on their cell phones all not with their surrounding at all !
Saw today a video of an Electronic Pedal Pub Car crash in Atlanta, Ga, most likely all were on there Cell phones at the time.
Possessive plural = "their"
And yes, driving while using a cell phone is dangerous. Indeed one study showed it was more dangerous than drunk driving (not that drunk driving is safe by any means).
Cell Phones should automatically shut off whenever they are in motion. There should be an easy update to do that. Their developers do not care how many they kill, maim, fall off buildings, cliffs or Water falls taking Selfies. They are doing what ever they can do to sell more Cells and developers do not care. They are self importance types most likely. Rich wants a job ! There should be a Class action law suit to put a stop to the Mayhem Cell phones create most everywhere they are on the move. Even at 40 mph a car will travel about 100' if the driver looks down to his cell phone or to the screen on the dash to answer a text.
Or on boats. Or do you think boats are okay to use a cell phone while driving? How about aircraft?Yeah but that would mean passengers in motor vehicles (or trains) couldn't make phone calls.
what a stupid comment. a gang robbing a store should justify the store owner wasting all of them PeriodA gang robbing a store is not looting
What if the gang numbered just 5, or 3 ?
What if the average age was 15, or 12 ?
What if the "gang" was just "looting" some food because they were hungry
A shopkeeper has the right to shoot them dead ?
Just what is your criteria for allowing lethal force ?
what a stupid comment. a gang robbing a store should justify the store owner wasting all of them Period
a gang doing almost anything illegal is a clear and present danger
I am not saying what the law currently is-I support shop keepers shooting a gang of looters.Now that's a stupid comment
A store owner "wasting" a gang of juveniles robbing his store ??
I think he'd have a hard time persuading the jury that his life was in danger.
A gang of half a dozen 10 year olds breaking into your car ?
I am not saying what the law currently is-I support shop keepers shooting a gang of looters.
He could probably beat the living crap out of all of them.Who mentioned looting ?
If a shopkeeper surprised a gang of say 4-6 ten year olds stealing food from his store, and kills shoots them dead, he can expect to spend a long time in jail.
He could probably beat the living crap out of all of them.
but if 10 or so 17-19 year olds smash into a shop and start stealing stuff, they should be fair game for an armed shopkeeper. P
I think the main purpose is to stop them from looting. If they die, them's the breaks. I am tired of people making excuses for such criminalsA meaningless phrase - does that include inflicting injuries upon them ?
Does it include inflicting injuries from which they can't recover from, like broken teeth ?
18 and 19 year olds are adults...so yes a gang of adults raiding your store is a different proposition
But I think you're missing the point here
What is the shopkeeper's goal ? To inflict injury ? The goal is to make the gang members leave, not to punish them by inflicting injury or even death.
I think the main purpose is to stop them from looting.
If they die, them's the breaks. I am tired of people making excuses for such criminals