The constitution regulates state and federal elections. Being private organizations, the constitution doesn't regulate party nominations, therefore party processes can't be unconstitutional.
They have every right to dig their own grave, honestly I hope they do.[/QUOTE
i do respectfully disagree ,again no where are the parties spoken to in the constitution,although the right to vote is ,5 times ,so no the party system can not be constitutional as it does not allow for an open vote .
how do you square the party system with the democratic process,when TRUMP wins a state and cruz gets the lions share of the delegates,no that is unconstitutional,come on man,TRUMP has two million more votes then cruz ,the only reason cruz is still in this is the system is corrupt,and a corrupt system is an unconstitutional system.
i am well aware now what the parties are up to( THANKS TO GOOGLE ) i thought i was an informed voter i was not,but i am now and this is about corruption in both parties,this is not 1972 the cats is out of the bag so to speak,to quote Curly Haugland, a republican party hack,We choose the nominee, not the voters: mr haugland can kiss this voter's posterior.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/16/we-choose-the-nominee-not-the-voters-senior-gop-official.html
run don run
run don run
The constitution regulates state and federal elections. Being private organizations, the constitution doesn't regulate party nominations, therefore party processes can't be unconstitutional.
They have every right to dig their own grave, honestly I hope they do.[/QUOTE
i do respectfully disagree ,again no where are the parties spoken to in the constitution,although the right to vote is ,5 times ,so no the party system can not be constitutional as it does not allow for an open vote .
how do you square the party system with the democratic process,when TRUMP wins a state and cruz gets the lions share of the delegates,no that is unconstitutional,come on man,TRUMP has two million more votes then cruz ,the only reason cruz is still in this is the system is corrupt,and a corrupt system is an unconstitutional system.
i am well aware now what the parties are up to( THANKS TO GOOGLE ) i thought i was an informed voter i was not,but i am now and this is about corruption in both parties,this is not 1972 the cats is out of the bag so to speak,to quote Curly Haugland, a republican party hack,We choose the nominee, not the voters: mr haugland can kiss this voter's posterior.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/16/we-choose-the-nominee-not-the-voters-senior-gop-official.html
run don run
run don run
so trump wins the vote and cruz playing by the RNC rules gets the delegates,so my vote does not count, it is all about the party.well the republican party has lost me for ever.
i looked and i still do not see any rnc or dnc rules in the constitution.
Well, if the RNC/GOPe were attempting to keep up pretenses, it appears that’s all gone now. During a CNBC interview Curly Haugland explains the RNC will select the republican nominee for president and the primary voters are irrelevant and inconsequential peons to be summarily dismissed.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com...l-we-choose-our-nominee-not-the-voters-video/
run don run
Trumpers dont seem to understand that political parties are private organizations...
i agree and thank the DNC is just as bad if not worse,pox on both of their houses,i am a conservative ,i am not a right wing conservative wing nut though,like most Americans i am in the middle,and find no room for voters like me in either party .
run don run
The Democratic and Republican parties are private organizations. The Constitution does not apply to them. They can create any rules they want to select a nominee.
Look - people care about the person they vote for. You vote for Trump - or whomever - because that's the person who appeals to you most. Most individuals don't give too much thought to whether the guy they're selecting can actually win in the general election. The party only cares about selecting someone who can win the general election. That's why those rules are in place. To make sure that a popular candidate whom the party doesn't think can win doesn't get the nomination.
It doesn't really matter whether you agree or not. The fact is, the constitution does no say anything about how parties are to pick their candidates, so they are therefore free to pick their candidates however they want. The right to vote only applies to state and federal elections. It doesn't apply to votes cast for the leadership of a private organization.
so you are in favor of throwing the constitution under the party buss and let a group of party hacks that represent 23% of all reg voters telling the rest of AMERICA who they will vote for,come on man.
run don run
exactly my point ,the process is unconstitutional,the fact that the party process does not allow one man one woman one vote is unconstitutional,it is obvious that the party hacks are running this show and can change the rules to fit their likes or dislikes,nothing fair or constitutional about this process.
you hold a vote and the winner wins,but no the parties want to play this shell game with delegates and disenfranchise millions of voters and you thank this is constitutional .
TRUMP has over two million more votes then cruz ,it is obvious that cruz knows how to play the game of disenfranchising voters and the RNC is just to happy to help in any way,come on man.
run don run
Trump is literally arguing that political parties are not private organizations.... They have the right to create their own rules and the rules were set years ago. Trump not understanding them and many of his supporters not understanding them is their own damn fault."Trumpers dont seem to understand" man that is an adult statement,what is hidden in you statement (not to well) is that people that vote for TRUMP are some how a little slow,no i understand quiet well what is going on and has been going on for to long.
the best you can do is insult millions of A fellow Americans with your "Trumpers dont seem to understand" bs,what a guy.
here is something for you,show me where in the constitution it says anything about parties or their rules,it does not although it does mention the right to vote 5 times.
so for a guy that is so much smarter then us "Trumpers" so show me where the constitution speaks of any political parties.
:lamorun don run
Have you actually read anything anyone has said to you?
yes i have and watch your mouth there brother,do not get above your raising ,you are not the only vet here man,and do not talk down to me.
yes i have herd and it is obvious you have not herd what i said, this show put on by both parties under the guise of a political convention is nothing but a shell game put on by the elites to keep control of washington dc and as i said the party process is unconstitutional,it is one man one woman one vote,the fact that both parties are a private entity or not does not matter,no where in the constitution does it say a word about political parties,or their rules,again the DNC and the RNC political process is unconstitutional.
run don run
Well, if the RNC/GOPe were attempting to keep up pretenses, it appears that’s all gone now. During a CNBC interview Curly Haugland explains the RNC will select the republican nominee for president and the primary voters are irrelevant and inconsequential peons to be summarily dismissed.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com...l-we-choose-our-nominee-not-the-voters-video/
run don run
The parties are private organizations and can do what ever they want within the party rules.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?