- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 47,360
- Reaction score
- 26,059
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I can't remember the exact question, but in response to a Philosophy class question that asked 'Why' I got a passing grade by answering 'why not'.......is that the practitioners spend centuries discussing it—only to come to the conclusion that there is no conclusion. What’s the point?
“The fundamental problem of philosophy is whether doing it has any point, since if it does not have any point, there is no reason to do it. It is suggested that the intrinsic point of doing philosophy is to establish a rational consensus about what the answers to its main questions are. But it seems that this cannot be accomplished because philosophical arguments are bound to be inconclusive. Still, philosophical research generates an increasing number of finer grained distinctions in terms of which we try to conceptualize reality, and this is a sort of progress. But if, as is likely, our arguments do not suffice to decide between these alternatives, our personalities might slip in to do so. Our philosophy will then express our personality. This could provide philosophy with a point for us. If some of our conclusions have practical import, philosophy could have the further point of giving us something by which we can live.”
The Fundamental Problem of Philosophy: Its Point | Journal of Practical Ethics
The Journal of Practical Ethics is an open access journal in moral and political philosophy (and related areas), published by the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, located at the University of Oxford.www.jpe.ox.ac.uk
Way easy continue the sentence question.The problem with philosophy
Philosophy isn't one big blob.
Philosophy is one part role playing and one part debate club. At any rate Philosophy is out dated by science. It served a good purpose centuries a go. But it is pointless now. It is just people's personal opinions.......is that the practitioners spend centuries discussing it—only to come to the conclusion that there is no conclusion. What’s the point?
“The fundamental problem of philosophy is whether doing it has any point, since if it does not have any point, there is no reason to do it. It is suggested that the intrinsic point of doing philosophy is to establish a rational consensus about what the answers to its main questions are. But it seems that this cannot be accomplished because philosophical arguments are bound to be inconclusive. Still, philosophical research generates an increasing number of finer grained distinctions in terms of which we try to conceptualize reality, and this is a sort of progress. But if, as is likely, our arguments do not suffice to decide between these alternatives, our personalities might slip in to do so. Our philosophy will then express our personality. This could provide philosophy with a point for us. If some of our conclusions have practical import, philosophy could have the further point of giving us something by which we can live.”
The Fundamental Problem of Philosophy: Its Point | Journal of Practical Ethics
The Journal of Practical Ethics is an open access journal in moral and political philosophy (and related areas), published by the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, located at the University of Oxford.www.jpe.ox.ac.uk
If every philosophy faculty in every university in the world had been closed in, say 1900, nothing would be different.......is that the practitioners spend centuries discussing it—only to come to the conclusion that there is no conclusion. What’s the point?
“The fundamental problem of philosophy is whether doing it has any point, since if it does not have any point, there is no reason to do it. It is suggested that the intrinsic point of doing philosophy is to establish a rational consensus about what the answers to its main questions are. But it seems that this cannot be accomplished because philosophical arguments are bound to be inconclusive. Still, philosophical research generates an increasing number of finer grained distinctions in terms of which we try to conceptualize reality, and this is a sort of progress. But if, as is likely, our arguments do not suffice to decide between these alternatives, our personalities might slip in to do so. Our philosophy will then express our personality. This could provide philosophy with a point for us. If some of our conclusions have practical import, philosophy could have the further point of giving us something by which we can live.”
The Fundamental Problem of Philosophy: Its Point | Journal of Practical Ethics
The Journal of Practical Ethics is an open access journal in moral and political philosophy (and related areas), published by the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, located at the University of Oxford.www.jpe.ox.ac.uk
What facts or conclusions has philosphy come up with over the centuries?
Philosophy is one part role playing and one part debate club. At any rate Philosophy is out dated by science. It served a good purpose centuries a go. But it is pointless now. It is just people's personal opinions.
......is that the practitioners spend centuries discussing it—only to come to the conclusion that there is no conclusion. What’s the point?
“The fundamental problem of philosophy is whether doing it has any point, since if it does not have any point, there is no reason to do it. It is suggested that the intrinsic point of doing philosophy is to establish a rational consensus about what the answers to its main questions are. But it seems that this cannot be accomplished because philosophical arguments are bound to be inconclusive. Still, philosophical research generates an increasing number of finer grained distinctions in terms of which we try to conceptualize reality, and this is a sort of progress. But if, as is likely, our arguments do not suffice to decide between these alternatives, our personalities might slip in to do so. Our philosophy will then express our personality. This could provide philosophy with a point for us. If some of our conclusions have practical import, philosophy could have the further point of giving us something by which we can live.”
The Fundamental Problem of Philosophy: Its Point | Journal of Practical Ethics
The Journal of Practical Ethics is an open access journal in moral and political philosophy (and related areas), published by the Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, located at the University of Oxford.www.jpe.ox.ac.uk
A perfect philosophical statement. Well done! Wide sweeping, all embracing but devoid of any contribution to the advancement of knowledge or human understanding. If you tripped over a kerb stone you would not require philosophical musing to convince you that the bruises were factual.All of them. How can you have a fact or a conclusion without a framework of what constitutes a fact or conclusion?
Higher sophistry relies to much on false equivalences and metaphores stretched beyond breaking point.Philosophy gives us a lens with which to view the world. Everyone has one, a conceptual framework in which they draw conclusions about their experience of the world, and everyone's is different. The argument that every philosophy is different, therefore philosophy is useless is like claiming anatomy is useless because every body is different.
A perfect philosophical statement. Well done! Wide sweeping, all embracing but devoid of any contribution to the advancement of knowledge or human understanding. If you tripped over a kerb stone you would not require philosophical musing to convince you that the bruises were factual.
Higher sophistry relies to much on false equivalences and metaphores stretched beyond breaking point.
The embedded assumption that use equals value is entirely philosophical.Philosophy is good when the conclusions of a particular set of starting assumptions and the logical/rhetorical algorithm that transforms those assumptions into a conclusion can be observable, repeatable, and measurable to verify the accuracy of that conclusion.
Most philosophy is not useful though and therefore has little value in any practical sense. Engaging in philosophy can be fun though and I studied it quite a bit in my early teens, but realized after a couple of years that it was just a toy and a tool to engage in mental exercise with. People confuse the fact with it being a toy or tool (a means) with having its own intrinsic value (an ends). I, luckily, did not fall into that trap of perspective.
The methods of processing information that philosophers have come up with are quite useful in other disciplines, such as social science.
Of course it is and of course people will find emotional and intellectual comfort in pointing that sort of thing out.The embedded assumption that use equals value is entirely philosophical.
You were editing during my reply.Of course it is and that is encapsulated in my greater point.
Yeah, sorry, I was still thinking through everything. I am happy where I landed though.You were editing during my reply.
S'all good.Yeah, sorry, I was still thinking through everything. I am happy where I landed though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?