• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The pro fetus position.

“The unborn” are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.”​

― Methodist Pastor David Barnhart
 
Just how "pro-life" are they?

Most Americans support abortion for non-medical reasons. The issue is...up until when? And pro-lifers wont address it at all. Not a serious, honest answer yet.

What distinction do they make in a fertilized egg, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks? What distinctions in development, status, humanity for the unborn? Or the woman? What differences in "that life" that must be saved?

All they ever say is..."she should have made up her mind sooner." So that's about punishing women, not about the life or humanity of the unborn.

The only real distinction that isnt arbitrary is at viability, ~24 weeks, and we had that under Roe v Wade.
 
Last edited:

This is the sole goal for many pro-life supporters, "as long as both survive the birth with heartbeats." Hard to get more dehumanizing than that, reducing both to nothing more than physiological functions.

With no acknowledgement for dependence on ventilators for the rest of either life, stroke or brain death, severely defective unborn with awareness, no concern for pain and suffering, etc.

Quantity over quality of life...it dehumanizes both.
 

It's easy for pro-lifers to sit in judgement, feeling entitled to impose their will when they dont know the woman's health or circumstances or risks. They dont care, they wont pay her consequences. They can sit on their couches and self-indulgently imagine "little baybees" inside strangers and self-righteously vote to take away the woman's right to consent to her own life, health, self-determination, bodily autonomy, moral agency.

Because if she would consider an abortion, she is automatically immoral and unclean and "doesnt deserve" any of that. So they feel no guilt in the judgement.
 

The problem these people have is Christianity is a very demanding religion. They want to say they are Pro-Life, hate homosexuals, persecute trans kids, and call it a day.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…