Hicup
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,081
- Reaction score
- 2,709
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Think about what the dimwits have done here. Hypothetically speaking, say Congress approves a bill and it passes both houses, but the sitting President veto's the Bill. If the house is controlled by the opposition party, they can file articles of impeachment for "obstruction of Congress", no need to secure the votes to override the veto, just impeach the mother ****er, how dare he veto the will of congress.. Doesn't have to be a crime, the very nature of obstructing the will of congress is enough now to impeach. Policy differences, schmolicy differences..
What a disaster that has all become.
By intentionally sending articles of impeachment without any crime, and the vagueness within, the dimwits have set a precedent that may have far reaching implications down the road. All the house needs to claim is that the sitting President vetoed the Bill based on political gain, or intent to gain personally and politically from the veto.. Boom, impeach the mother ****er..
Stupid dimwits!
Tim-
What a disaster that has all become.
By intentionally sending articles of impeachment without any crime, and the vagueness within, the dimwits have set a precedent that may have far reaching implications down the road. All the house needs to claim is that the sitting President vetoed the Bill based on political gain, or intent to gain personally and politically from the veto.. Boom, impeach the mother ****er..
Stupid dimwits!
Tim-