• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Preamble

Then maybe you should stop seeking the perfect socialist utopia that you've been seeking.
LOL Making things better or more sensible, or more supportive of our goal of forming a more perfect union isn't seeking a socialist utopia. Those don't exist. I don't seek what is impossible.
 
LOL Making things better or more sensible, or more supportive of our goal of forming a more perfect union isn't seeking a socialist utopia. Those don't exist. I don't seek what is impossible.
Just curious, what does a "more perfect union" look like. When are we going to stop screwing around with the people of this country and start allowing them to enjoy THEIR life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. We are not all the same, one thing that is the same about us is, we all have different opinions, and you know, that's okay. It stops being okay when one faction tries to force their opinion on the masses at whole, it doesn't matter what faction you belong to, just leave the people alone.
 
quote

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
end quote

Do you know why its the First 52 Words of the United States Constitution ?
It's introducing the reason for and concept of the following ruleset.
It's damn near the dictionary definition of what "preamble" means.
 
Then maybe you should stop seeking the perfect socialist utopia that you've been seeking.

As opposed to actively establishing RW socialism to require conformity to the Rep/cons version of utopia by taking away others' rights to have only rights consistent with the RW idealism of heterosexual, misogynist, xenophobic, racist white males.
 
As opposed to actively establishing RW socialism to require conformity to the Rep/cons version of utopia by taking away others' rights to have only rights consistent with the RW idealism of heterosexual, misogynist, xenophobic, racist white males.
The real socialists, you're seeking, kill those people, NO QUESTIONS ASKED. Go try your bullshit under Putin, and see what happens. I dare you. You'll be running back to us conservatives so ****ing fast it'll snap your neck. Your ideas are foolish stupidity to say the least.
 
The real socialists, you're seeking, kill those people, NO QUESTIONS ASKED. Go try your bullshit under Putin, and see what happens. I dare you. You'll be running back to us conservatives so ****ing fast it'll snap your neck. Your ideas are foolish stupidity to say the least.
What kind of crap is that... We don't live under Putin!!!
------
Right Wing white people DO NOT, AND WILL NOT dictate over America nor American Society... We've endured 100's of years of that savagery and barbarism and all its racist ignorance.
White Right Wing White People DON'T OWN AMERICA... the sooner white people get that through their heads, the sooner they will stop trying to act like they "Own" America.

These Right Wingers, fight against THE PREAMBLE, simply because they can't make it "be only for white people". They had no problem with in during the 100's of years of Slavery when they dominated everything, they had no problem with it, during the 100 yrs of Jim Crow, when all the Bastardizations of Laws was done to support Racism's Segregation, and Business had no problem with it, when they could suck up as much government assistance funds and use them to benefit "white's only"...

NOW, people know those PRINCIPLES AND VALUES stand for All of America and All of America's Society.... So Now, the Right Winger want to say the Preamble is meaningless, only because its not longer considered to push the Constitutional backed Legislation to be just for white people.
 
What kind of crap is that... We don't live under Putin!!!
------
Right Wing white people DO NOT, AND WILL NOT dictate over America nor American Society... We've endured 100's of years of that savagery and barbarism and all its racist ignorance.
White Right Wing White People DON'T OWN AMERICA... the sooner white people get that through their heads, the sooner they will stop trying to act like they "Own" America.

These Right Wingers, fight against THE PREAMBLE, simply because they can't make it "be only for white people". They had no problem with in during the 100's of years of Slavery when they dominated everything, they had no problem with it, during the 100 yrs of Jim Crow, when all the Bastardizations of Laws was done to support Racism's Segregation, and Business had no problem with it, when they could suck up as much government assistance funds and use them to benefit "white's only"...

NOW, people know those PRINCIPLES AND VALUES stand for All of America and All of America's Society.... So Now, the Right Winger want to say the Preamble is meaningless, only because its not longer considered to push the Constitutional backed Legislation to be just for white people.
You might want to revisit the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and find out just who opposed this legislation, the same goes with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Here's a clue, it was the democrats on both accounts. One thing that is held true of the liberal left, project their bigotry on the opposing party and convince the people that it wasn't them that did this but the, as you put it, Right Wing White people. It seems that you have bought into this, hook, line and sinker. It wasn't the Right Wing White people that wanted slavery, in fact most who were opposed to slavery were Right Wing White people. Jim Crow laws were enacted by the Southern Democrats or as they were called Dixiecrats, to suppress the back votes in the south and enforce a new brand of slavery. Most Right Wing White people will tell you that the opening words of the preamble "WE the PEOPLE" mean just that, ALL PEOPLE, and it doesn't matter what color you are. So, I don't know what Reality you are living under, but your post is full of misconceptions.

Our Constitution has come along way since its inception, 27 amendments have been added to correct oversights and we are not done yet.
 
You might want to revisit the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and find out just who opposed this legislation, the same goes with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Here's a clue, it was the democrats on both accounts. One thing that is held true of the liberal left, project their bigotry on the opposing party and convince the people that it wasn't them that did this but the, as you put it, Right Wing White people. It seems that you have bought into this, hook, line and sinker. It wasn't the Right Wing White people that wanted slavery, in fact most who were opposed to slavery were Right Wing White people. Jim Crow laws were enacted by the Southern Democrats or as they were called Dixiecrats, to suppress the back votes in the south and enforce a new brand of slavery. Most Right Wing White people will tell you that the opening words of the preamble "WE the PEOPLE" mean just that, ALL PEOPLE, and it doesn't matter what color you are. So, I don't know what Reality you are living under, but your post is full of misconceptions.

Our Constitution has come along way since its inception, 27 amendments have been added to correct oversights and we are not done yet.
You might want to acknowledge the Democratic Party of TODAY ..... is NOT the same Right Winger Segregationist of the Past. maybe you should vist the Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan Republicanims... to see and know that the Racist, Segregationist, Anti Government Types and Anti Immigration Types are REPUBLICANS.

It would be to your benefit to follow history with more detail, not try and ignore the Political Flip, to not acknowledge the Racial makeup of Today's Republicans, Right slanted Libertarians and Right slanted Independents.

  • We've gone over this 100 times in this Forum... people simply don't keep up... and some have selective amnesia, and some try to gloss over facts they don't want to acknowledge.

Everyone should know, the DIXIECRATS were SEGREGATIONIST..... They despised the Party of Lincoln... After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, they no longer wanted to be Democrats, because President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and LBJ was a Democrat, and LBJ passed the Voting Rights Act and the Immigration Act of 1965 and put a Black Man on The Supreme Court.

Segregationist White People "went stone crazy'''...!!!! they tried every means they could to roll back Civil Right, one by trying to infiltrate the Republican Party, and the NON SEGREGATIONIST dominated the Democrat Party once the Southern White Segregationist began Voting Republican, and the Northern Right White Racist and MidWestern Racist began voting Republican.

Liberal Minded People who embrace Multiracial, Multiethnic and Multicultural America, became the Party of The Democrats, which still exist this very day.

White Segregationist Racist have tried every trick they can conjure up to push White Nationalism... They hated the 1965 Immigration Act, which is why to this very day after their attacks, we no longer have the Immigration Reforms that could have built onto the 1965 Immigration Act... Becasue WHITE PEOPLE did not want to see NON WHITE PEOPLE have the same IMMIGRATION RIGHTS... as white people form countries that are predominantly with white people.

America's biggest problem has always been (Some) "White People".... and Their Racism....

America's Values and Principle within THE PREAMBLE
is not a problem and has been and is a good thing!!

The problem is... created by WHITE PEOPLE who do not want it to apply to and for "All American People'

-------------------------

Within the American White Race, unfortunately they have such vile within (A SEGMENT OF) their Race, until the segment of Racist Bigots, Attack the U.S. Capitol, because Racist and Bigoted Whites Could Not steal and hijack and complete their attempted Coup D'etat

These White Racist, have a long history of Attacking Anything and Everything That has anything to do with supporting Equality of Citizen as Person, who is Individual.
 
Last edited:
You might want to acknowledge the Democratic Party of TODAY ..... is NOT the same Right Winger Segregationist of the Past. maybe you should vist the Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan Republicanims... to see and know that the Racist, Segregationist, Anti Government Types and Anti Immigration Types are REPUBLICANS.

It would be to your benefit to follow history with more detail, not try and ignore the Political Flip, to not acknowledge the Racial makeup of Today's Republicans, Right slanted Libertarians and Right slanted Independents.

  • We've gone over this 100 times in this Forum... people simply don't keep up... and some have selective amnesia, and some try to gloss over facts they don't want to acknowledge.

Everyone should know, the DIXIECRATS were SEGREGATIONIST..... They despised the Party of Lincoln... After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, they no longer wanted to be Democrats, because President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and LBJ was a Democrat, and LBJ passed the Voting Rights Act and the Immigration Act of 1965 and put a Black Man on The Supreme Court.

Segregationist White People "went stone crazy'''...!!!! they tried every means they could to roll back Civil Right, one by trying to infiltrate the Republican Party, and the NON SEGREGATIONIST dominated the Democrat Party once the Southern White Segregationist began Voting Republican, and the Northern Right White Racist and MidWestern Racist began voting Republican.

Liberal Minded People who embrace Multiracial, Multiethnic and Multicultural America, became the Party of The Democrats, which still exist this very day.

White Segregationist Racist have tried every trick they can conjure up to push White Nationalism... They hated the 1965 Immigration Act, which is why to this very day after their attacks, we no longer have the Immigration Reforms that could have built onto the 1965 Immigration Act... Becasue WHITE PEOPLE did not want to see NON WHITE PEOPLE have the same IMMIGRATION RIGHTS... as white people form countries that are predominantly with white people.

America's biggest problem has always been (Some) "White People".... and Their Racism....

America's Values and Principle within THE PREAMBLE
is not a problem and has been and is a good thing!!

The problem is... created by WHITE PEOPLE who do not want it to apply to and for "All American People'

-------------------------

Within the American White Race, unfortunately they have such vile within (A SEGMENT OF) their Race, until the segment of Racist Bigots, Attack the U.S. Capitol, because Racist and Bigoted Whites Could Not steal and hijack and complete their attempted Coup D'etat

These White Racist, have a long history of Attacking Anything and Everything That has anything to do with supporting Equality of Citizen as Person, who is Individual.

The more "white people" in general face and speak out of these fact, the better America will be...
White people have been taught to ignore the truth and give a pass to the craziness, simply because it was created and done by white people.

  • (We see a vivid example of that, in how so many "white people" choose to lie and deny... the barbaric savagery and the vile terrorist, seditious and subversive acts of insurrection and attempted Coup D' etat THE ENTIRE WORLD WATCHED ON LIVE TV.
Now, there is the Sick S.O.B. Cawthorn with his delusion of expecting "white skin male entitlement for being a white skin male", wants to launch an attack upon the government because his demented ass did not win.
 
The Federalist papers are not the Constitution.
No, they are the arguments made by those explaining to voters just what the Constitution means and how it is supposed to work, in order to convince the voters to support it. There's a reason why the Federalist Papers are quoted in Supreme Court opinions regularly.

It's introducing the reason for and concept of the following ruleset.
It's damn near the dictionary definition of what "preamble" means.
Yup, the Preamble explains what the purposes of the Constitution is, and the rest of the Constitution lays out how those purposes are to be accomplished.
 
You might want to acknowledge the Democratic Party of TODAY ..... is NOT the same Right Winger Segregationist of the Past. maybe you should vist the Goldwater, Nixon and Reagan Republicanims... to see and know that the Racist, Segregationist, Anti Government Types and Anti Immigration Types are REPUBLICANS.

It would be to your benefit to follow history with more detail, not try and ignore the Political Flip, to not acknowledge the Racial makeup of Today's Republicans, Right slanted Libertarians and Right slanted Independents.

  • We've gone over this 100 times in this Forum... people simply don't keep up... and some have selective amnesia, and some try to gloss over facts they don't want to acknowledge.

Everyone should know, the DIXIECRATS were SEGREGATIONIST..... They despised the Party of Lincoln... After the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, they no longer wanted to be Democrats, because President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and LBJ was a Democrat, and LBJ passed the Voting Rights Act and the Immigration Act of 1965 and put a Black Man on The Supreme Court.

Segregationist White People "went stone crazy'''...!!!! they tried every means they could to roll back Civil Right, one by trying to infiltrate the Republican Party, and the NON SEGREGATIONIST dominated the Democrat Party once the Southern White Segregationist began Voting Republican, and the Northern Right White Racist and MidWestern Racist began voting Republican.

Liberal Minded People who embrace Multiracial, Multiethnic and Multicultural America, became the Party of The Democrats, which still exist this very day.

White Segregationist Racist have tried every trick they can conjure up to push White Nationalism... They hated the 1965 Immigration Act, which is why to this very day after their attacks, we no longer have the Immigration Reforms that could have built onto the 1965 Immigration Act... Becasue WHITE PEOPLE did not want to see NON WHITE PEOPLE have the same IMMIGRATION RIGHTS... as white people form countries that are predominantly with white people.

America's biggest problem has always been (Some) "White People".... and Their Racism....

America's Values and Principle within THE PREAMBLE
is not a problem and has been and is a good thing!!

The problem is... created by WHITE PEOPLE who do not want it to apply to and for "All American People'

-------------------------

Within the American White Race, unfortunately they have such vile within (A SEGMENT OF) their Race, until the segment of Racist Bigots, Attack the U.S. Capitol, because Racist and Bigoted Whites Could Not steal and hijack and complete their attempted Coup D'etat

These White Racist, have a long history of Attacking Anything and Everything That has anything to do with supporting Equality of Citizen as Person, who is Individual.

1653015231441.png
 
If it was the last 52 words they couldn't call it a preamble
 
Perhaps worded a little strongly, but essentially correct. The "more perfect union" means "more perfect than under the Articles of Confederation."


True, the Preamble is not a legally binding statement. What it is, IMHO, is the finest short statement of the fundamental purposes of government in history.


Nope, not even. True, the Constitution was written entirely in secret, and with good reason. But it was ratified in the full light of day, with often long and rancorous public debate. And while it required nine of the thirteen states to ratify it for it to go into effect, in each state the question was decided by a simple majority vote of the delegates elected to the ratification conventions.


No, it is not. In a democracy, whatever the majority wants it gets--the less that is true, the less of a democracy that system of government is. What the Constitution creates is a constitutional federal democratic republic ("republic" defined as any system that mixes the three "pure" forms of government--monarchical, aristocratic, and democratic--into a Rube Goldberg device).

You're pretending that I am speaking of democracy as a pure or direct democracy. I am not. I said "representative" democracy. Which is definitively the American form of a federalist republic. The American federalist republic is a representative democracy.

The leanest definition of a republic specifically excludes monarchical.
 

Hitchens was the best. Funny beyond laughter, without meaning to be funny. Now I'm seeing Libertarian left. I wish Hitchens were here to give us his take on that. I'm guessing "I am my own nation. I'm just lib." But how can one be a liberal and own nation at the same time?
 
You're pretending that I am speaking of democracy as a pure or direct democracy. I am not. I said "representative" democracy. Which is definitively the American form of a federalist republic. The American federalist republic is a representative democracy.
It doesn't matter whether it's direct or representative, a democracy is a system where the majority gets what it wants. To the extent that a system has institutions and procedures in place to prevent that, it isn't democratic. And the Constitution (and the state constitutions) are full of them.

The leanest definition of a republic specifically excludes monarchical.
Nope, it doesn't, I have no problem envisioning a republic with a monarch as the chief executive. If we passed an amendment making the presidency a life-long, inherited position--a king--and left everything else the same, we'd still be a republic.
 
< Sigh > Finally, you get to your point. You could've just stated this in post #1 without all the pointless verbosity - there apparently to give some sort of credence or weight to your point (which it doesn't).

How in the world do you get a mutable Constitution from the phrase "to make a more perfect union?"

And the nonsense that this means (from your table) "to make everything in our country as perfect as possible" is sheer, unadulterated BS.

This is classic progressive tripe - just another in a long, sad history of progressives trying to undermine the Constitution so they can replace it with something more to their liking.

Not buying it for one second.

More like, "To make our alliance better." Remember, they were only the 13 colonies and had just gone through the Articles of Confederation, which was a total sh*tshow.
 
< Sigh > Finally, you get to your point. You could've just stated this in post #1 without all the pointless verbosity - there apparently to give some sort of credence or weight to your point (which it doesn't).

How in the world do you get a mutable Constitution from the phrase "to make a more perfect union?"

And the nonsense that this means (from your table) "to make everything in our country as perfect as possible" is sheer, unadulterated BS.

This is classic progressive tripe - just another in a long, sad history of progressives trying to undermine the Constitution so they can replace it with something more to their liking.

Not buying it for one second.
No one is selling you anything, The Document existed long before you existed, and maybe before your ancestry ever came to this country, so, your opinion's about the documents are your choice, but it does not change the words of the documents, nor what the scholars through history have extracted and associated to the principles and values.
------
One thing is a fact,... They developed a Constitution that is with the potential, capability and the functional means to achieve a system and society that is enable to achieve and prosper all that the Preamble puts forth as principles and values; continue to function to do just that, by and through the works and efforts of "We The People" in and through our Government, can and will continue to build in the continual pursuit of making a more perfect Union.

This document was writted by men with a mission, not fools of fancy... they knew nothing is "perfect", its why they say... make a more perfect, which means in simple terms "a continuance in and withn and through improvements and advancements.

There is not a country with people on the planet that advances and improves without " Its own forms of governments". What American's can't do is dictate how others form their style of government and create their manners and means of living by and through their own principles and values.

America as we know it today, from point of the arrival of Various Ethnicities of Europeans, is a history that borrowed from many Ancient Civilizations and Ancient Cultures, far and beyond just Europe. The Europeans who came here, did not come here with some "single unified culture", they were people from all across Europe, and that history has a Mix and Mingle with Asian and Africa and Other Countries inbetween, before and after the arrival of foreign people on this North America Continent.
  • Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, Ancient Africa, Greece, Rome, Spain and others Countries had established Civilized System of Governance, long before Colombus Ancestry were even of a conceptual existence. The Spainard Colombus's pursuit of a route to China, is what led him to land upon the Central American and North American Continent.
---------
Governing Systems:
  • American Native Indians had a form of governing themselves The history of Native Americans in the United States began before the founding of the country, tens of thousands of years ago with the settlement of the Americas by the Paleo-Indians
  • Long before any European came to this land, Native American Indians had their own set of "priniples and values".
  • They had their own ideology of life; they lived with regard and respect and in accord with nature and the changes of its seasons and had their own concepts of spiritual beliefs, long before European Christianity was promoted.
  • They lived and did so, for many thousands of years before any European people came to this North and Central American Continent.
  • Their lifestyle was different from the European Invaders, they were looked down upon by Europeans, but that never means they were ever lesser people with their own principles and values and manner of life within and through their intra and inter tribal relations.
  • What the Native American Indians and Mexican Indians did not have were slums, drunkards and homeless disconnected people. That ideology was imported to this continent.
 
LOL Making things better or more sensible, or more supportive of our goal of forming a more perfect union isn't seeking a socialist utopia. Those don't exist. I don't seek what is impossible.

Yet.
 
SEE Post # 83 from another Thread
 
Why, what is in it that is pertinent in any way ?
It's about "THE CONSTITUTION" and the fact that The Constitution, makes no mention, no reference, no suggestion, and no constitutional provision for Political Parties.
 
Has anyone stated that it does ?
People have been "groomed and indoctrinated" to think it has to be a standard to have Political Parties... IF they had not been groomed and indoctrinated, we would not see people claiming to be a member of "any" Political Party (Gang).

I would take Education to Re-Educate People, of the True and Real Divisiveness which is Political Parties.

In America, its ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE... IF, we had a more "Educated Population" and especially in "Civics of American Representative Democracy" who actually were groomed and educated to "Understand legislation", WITHIN a Governing System that Governs by and through Regulatory Governance. People would know more and be better equipped with knowledge and understanding enough not only to know how to Choose elected representatives; people would know how to hold State Representative, both In-State and In-Federal Congress to Account for Themselves and Stand Responsible to The Majority and Minority Their District is Comprised of, ONLY then would State Representative know how to be better at Crafting Legislation.

The same is True for "Senators" - Every State is comprised of People who have a Majority Consensus and a Minority Consensus, and NO Senator can do the Job, without Respect for both the Majority Consensus and the Minority Consensue within their respective State.

We would also, NOT HAVE a Supreme Court with any Judges claiming themselves Democrat or Republican, they would be simply Judgest dealing with the Constitution and the Laws of The Land. Their Decision would deal with how the their summary impacts both the Majority Consensus and the Minority Consensue of Citizens within any given District and any given State.


We would not have the Wealthy "Buying Groups of Elected People" under the banner of Political Party.

Every Human Being who is alive, have a mixture of Liberal and Conservative thoughts about many varied things within life, and people as life has shown, do gravitate to have variance in their mentality changes when it comes to Liberalism and Conservatism.

Example:
There are people who claim not only "conservative, but some claim racism", and then they have a child who has a Mixed Race "Grandchild' and suddenly, some abandon that crude hard line ideology.

There are people in this country, who don't even know the mixture in their extended families over Centuries, some were "taught" to deny and ignore various races and ethnicity in their Family lineage, and NOW... with the General Public having Unrestricted Access to "Geneology"... are finding out, just how many races and ethnicities are in their historical bloodline lineage.

Its no longer 'white people' claiming only the races and ethnicity they consider based on some white skin popularity, they are finding the long history, is revealing mixtures that span the spectrum of various races over the centures, who mixed and mated and produced offsprings.


We have too many within Society too "Under-educated" and "Miseducated" as to What Represenatative Democracy is
to even be aware of knowing they promote
DIVISIVENESS

People cry and scream that the government does work,
when fact is the people are too Uneducated and Deluded into accepting the Ignorance of Political Parties until they DO NOT know how A REPUBLIC FORM OF REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT was designed to work.
By
Our Constitutional Based Representative Democracy.
 
Last edited:
People have been "groomed and indoctrinated" to think it has to be a standard to have Political Parties... IF they had not been groomed and indoctrinated, we would not see people claiming to be a member of "any" Political Party (Gang).

I would take Education to Re-Educate People, of the True and Real Divisiveness which is Political Parties.

In America, its ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE... IF, we had a more "Educated Population" and especially in "Civics of American Representative Democracy" who actually were groomed and educated to "Understand legislation", WITHIN a Governing System that Governs by and through Regulatory Governance. People would know more and be better equipped with knowledge and understanding enough not only to know how to Choose elected representatives; people would know how to hold State Representative, both In-State and In-Federal Congress to Account for Themselves and Stand Responsible to The Majority and Minority Their District is Comprised of, ONLY then would State Representative know how to be better at Crafting Legislation.

The same is True for "Senators" - Every State is comprised of People who have a Majority Consensus and a Minority Consensus, and NO Senator can do the Job, without Respect for both the Majority Consensus and the Minority Consensue within their respective State.

We would also, NOT HAVE a Supreme Court with any Judges claiming themselves Democrat or Republican, they would be simply Judgest dealing with the Constitution and the Laws of The Land. Their Decision would deal with how the their summary impacts both the Majority Consensus and the Minority Consensue of Citizens within any given District and any given State...

OK you raise a few issues there:

1. Political parties: Every democracy on Earth has them, because all politicians know that there's strength in numbers. Like it or not, the majority of people vote for a party, not an individual. Though it is true that a truly bad candidate can turn off enough of his/her natural supporters to make a difference
However the Primary selection process helps with that. eg: Madison Cawthorn's recent de-selection.

2. Partisan Politics: The antipathy between the two major political parties in the USA, is greater and more hostile than in any other Western democracy. The starkest example of this was Trump gleefully boasting that as president, he often didn't do what was right, but rather the opposite of what Obama had done. And his moronic followers actually cheered him for that
In any other Western democracy, Trump would've been derided as an ignorant moron.

3. The Judiciary: IMO, the framers of the Constitution made several big mistakes, one of them was the state that the judiciary was part of the government - it is not, nor should it ever be regarded as being so
The USA elects sheriffs and judges; it should not do; judges and law enforcement need to be totally divorced from popular opinion - the current system is too close to mob rule
Judges need to judge by what is right and not by what is popular.
Judges need to be appointed, not elected, and there needs to be term limits. Appointments for life leads to corruption.
 
Back
Top Bottom