• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam


New member
Aug 27, 2005
Reaction score
Political Leaning
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam
By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | September 6, 2005

Frontpage Interviews guest today is Robert Spencer, a pre-eminent scholar of Islamic history, theology, and law. The director of Jihad Watch, he is the author of five books, seven monographs, and hundreds of articles about jihad and Islamic terrorism, including Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the Worlds Fastest Growing Faith. He is the author of the new book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades).

FP: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Spencer: Thank you, Jamie. FrontPage is one of the few media outlets, liberal or conservative, that is willing to allow honest discussion and exploration of the roots of Islamic terrorism, and I am honored to be a part of that.

FP: Thank you Mr. Spencer. So tell us, what is the politically correct guide to Islam?

Spencer: Unfortunately, there are many such books. Among the most notable, and egregious in their whitewashing of Islam’s theology, history, and present-day reality, is Islam: A Short History by Karen Armstrong and The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? by John Esposito. One that is more like my latest book in format is The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Understanding Islam by Yahiya Emerick. A popular new PC guide to Islam is No god but God : The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam by Reza Aslan.

FP: What is your inspiration to speak the unspoken truths about Islam?

Spencer: I speak out simply because few others are doing so. The general refusal to face the realities of what we are really up against in what is popularly known as the war on terror is crippling our ability to mount a fully effective response to the challenge of the global jihad. Political correctness and well-meaning naïveté are playing into the hands of the jihadists and making for some egregious policy miscalculations. Several rather high-profile conservatives, for example, have told me that by focusing attention on the elements of Islam that give rise to violence and fanaticism, I am alienating moderate Muslims who might otherwise be our allies in the struggle against Islamic terror. So in effect they would prefer to pretend that Islam is a peaceful religion at its core in the hopes that this fiction will win us some friends in the Islamic world.

This kind of thinking is flawed in many ways. In the first place, pretending that anything false is true is not ultimately going to get us anywhere. And if we refuse to allow honest exploration of what it is about Islam that is making so many Muslims violent today, we are not really helping sincere moderate Muslims: in fact, we’re cutting the ground out from under them by denying that there is anything about their religion that they need to face and combat if they wish to establish a lasting framework for peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims.

FP: If Islam is truly a religion of peace and tolerance than why is it so dangerous to say what you want about it? You have received death threats over the years for instance. Can you talk a bit about this?

Spencer: Yes, these threats are in effect saying, “Say that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance, or we’ll kill you!” I have received death threats, but I am not going to stop telling the truth because of them. If everyone who tells truths that others don’t want people to know gives in to violent intimidation, what kind of world would it be?

FP: It is interesting you say this because the numerous death threats I have received entail the same irrational paradigm. Let me explain:

While it is a given that many Muslims are on our side against extremism, that we must ally ourselves with them (i.e. Free Muslims Coalition, Sheikh Palazzi etc.), and that Muslims have the power to collectively reform and change their religion into one of tolerance and peace (and that we must promote this effort), I have at times shed light on the elements of the Islamic religion that, as you show, legitimize and promote violence. Because of this, I have often encountered email correspondence of the following nature:

[a] A Muslim emails me and tells me to never say again that Islam ever advocates violence because this is not true.

I answer in an email that I am not saying such a thing off the top of my head but simply just gathering conclusions from reading the Qur'an (i.e. the Verse of the Sword, Sura 9:5, 9:29 etc.) -- a source from which Osama and al-Zarqawi receive their inspiration.

[c] Then the Muslim writes back saying that he will kill me.

The logic here is very twisted. How does the individual who threatens me rationalize his step c with step a? If his effort is to convince me of the inaccuracy of my own findings, he is not doing a very successful or convincing job, to say the least. What is the psychology here?

Spencer: This is a strange contradiction from a non-Muslim perspective, but not from that of a Muslim who believes in traditional Islamic legal directives calling for the deaths of unbelievers who are at war with Islam. From the perspective of such a man, Islam is indeed a religion of peace: the peace that will prevail over the world when Sharia is the supreme law of every land. To bring this about, he believes he is commanded by God to wage war – not undifferentiated mayhem, but war for specified purposes, under specific circumstances and for particular ends. When you invoke the Qur’an and other Islamic sources to make that point that elements of the Islamic religion legitimize and promote violence, you are doing so as an infidel. Even if what you say is correct, you are approaching it all as an infidel and are thus insulting Islam. And this insult must be avenged. It isn’t that you are inaccurate, it is that you are critical. You are mistaking what they see as justice for undifferentiated violence.

Read it all at: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Article...le.asp?ID=19360

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1326 Islam's Supremacist Past Is Its Present

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1303 Multiculturalism, Tolerance and Pluralism in Islam

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1298 Tolerance and Pluralism: Islamic Supremacist Literature sold in OZ Islamic Bookstores

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1292 Islamic Separtists in Australia: That's why we don't believe in democracy

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1281 Tolerance and Pluralism: Islamic Supremacist Literature casually sold in Australian Mosque

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1261 Tolerance and Pluralism: Muslim converts to Christianity face persecution and death in Bangladesh

See also:
Tolerance and Pluralism: Muslim Book calls Norwegians
'Satan's sons'

See also: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khilafism/message/1237
Triple-pronged Jihad -- Military, Economic and Cultural

See also:
Al-Qaeda book on managing savagery

See also:
Chicago Tribune: Watchdog group assails mosque's Saudi

See also:
Egyptian Progressive Criticizes Muslim Intellectual

See also:
Submission - Never-ending Islamic Conspiracies

See also:
Blood Libel: Muslim Conspiracy Theories

See also:
Comparing the Rhetoric of Jihadism and Nazism

See also:
Arab ethnic cleansing imperialism and colonialism:
1,400 Years of Islamic Aggression

See also:
Saudi export of strict Islam raises suspicions

See also:
The Race Against Lies

See also:
Christians and Jews Demonized in Saudi Textbooks

See also:
Islamic concept of Al-Taqiyah to infiltrate and
destroy kafir countries

See also:
The Rise of Middle Eastern Crime in Australia

See also:
"Intolerant Form of Islam" Taught in German Public

See also:
Egyptian Textbook: Beheadings are part of Islamic

See also:
Exclusivism and multiculturalism in Islamic society

See also:
Hate at the Local Mosque

See also:
The Imperialism of Khilafists: Their grand designs to
conquer the west

See also:
New Book Calls Europe 'Province of Islam'

See also:
The Agenda of Islam: A War Between Civilizations

See also:
The Clash Of Civilizations And The Great Caliphate
"Today in the Religion of Peach a suicide bomber killed a grandma and her 18 month old grandaughter" Not a very nice religion is it? Wow, so 19 muslim men borded 4 planes, 2 crashing into the world trade centers, 1 crashing into the Pentagon, and won was ramed into the groud. It killed 3000 americans on American soil. From a non politicial view I would say that all Arabians should be profiled before they got on a plane. DUH!!!!
And a friend of mine once had rocks thrown at him out of a car when he was wearing his yarmulke on the way to school. What's your point? Some fundamentalists are nasty, violent arseholes? Gee, I'd never noticed. :roll:
Yes, and many of us have been discriminated against by jews because we were not jews....
Top Bottom