calm
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction score
- 123
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Hi!
"The Plans Of Insurrection" is not meant as real or a reflection actual ongoing plans.
I was hoping we could sort of talk about the problems and difficulties "Activists" might anticipate or face if they had an objective of challenging the status quo within a 5 year period of time and to "WIN".
I guess people could just walk down the street wearing "Fake or Imitation" suicide vests. It seems to me that the Ruling Class only listen to those people wearing suicide vests. In every Land, across the universe, if there are people wearing suicide vests, you can rest assured that the U.S. is there begging to help the suicide bombers, promising to spend whatever it takes just to convince the Suicide Folks to quietly remove their Suicide Vests.
Does anybody think that it is possible to WIN via the ballot box? The activists would need a rather large organization in order to have representation at every district. What would be the actual financial cost of just the legwork or just the paperwork only of getting an "INDEPENDENT" Activists" name on every ballot across the country?
And, if the activists won every ballot in 2016, and by chance won the Presidency as well, would that be enough to own the Congress with a majority and to begin making major changes to International Trade Agreements and the Financial Services sector?
Or, would it only be possible to WIN complete control in 2020 because not all Congressmen/Senators are elected in the same year?
Would you trust electronic voting machines over the span of 2 federal election periods after reviewing the capabilities of the NSA and of software firms setting up backdoors? And, as I recall, the Supreme Court claimed that the voting machine manufacturers did not need to publically announce the software/hardware content. It was claimed to be proprietary.
What do you think the Supreme Court would do if the WINNERS began to tinker with these two huge segments (trade/finance) of the economy?
What if the Supreme Court claimed any New Activist Laws to be "Unconstitutional"?
Calm
"The Plans Of Insurrection" is not meant as real or a reflection actual ongoing plans.
I was hoping we could sort of talk about the problems and difficulties "Activists" might anticipate or face if they had an objective of challenging the status quo within a 5 year period of time and to "WIN".
I guess people could just walk down the street wearing "Fake or Imitation" suicide vests. It seems to me that the Ruling Class only listen to those people wearing suicide vests. In every Land, across the universe, if there are people wearing suicide vests, you can rest assured that the U.S. is there begging to help the suicide bombers, promising to spend whatever it takes just to convince the Suicide Folks to quietly remove their Suicide Vests.
Does anybody think that it is possible to WIN via the ballot box? The activists would need a rather large organization in order to have representation at every district. What would be the actual financial cost of just the legwork or just the paperwork only of getting an "INDEPENDENT" Activists" name on every ballot across the country?
And, if the activists won every ballot in 2016, and by chance won the Presidency as well, would that be enough to own the Congress with a majority and to begin making major changes to International Trade Agreements and the Financial Services sector?
Or, would it only be possible to WIN complete control in 2020 because not all Congressmen/Senators are elected in the same year?
Would you trust electronic voting machines over the span of 2 federal election periods after reviewing the capabilities of the NSA and of software firms setting up backdoors? And, as I recall, the Supreme Court claimed that the voting machine manufacturers did not need to publically announce the software/hardware content. It was claimed to be proprietary.
What do you think the Supreme Court would do if the WINNERS began to tinker with these two huge segments (trade/finance) of the economy?
What if the Supreme Court claimed any New Activist Laws to be "Unconstitutional"?
Calm