- Joined
- Jan 8, 2017
- Messages
- 18,794
- Reaction score
- 5,161
- Location
- new zealand.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
If a government should choose to say that abortion is not for politicians to decide but is a decision best left as a medical concern. When the government says it will set no limit to abortion. That does not mean they are the only arbiters in this decision. So in turn we should look at the medical profession and in particular the ethical standards that they abide by. Because they will not be guided by law but instead law may be guided by medical knowledge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethics
The practice of ethical standards is not a choice in the medical profession as committees of ethical practices do have powers to ban people from practicing. Many medical schools still administer a version of a modern hippocratic oath. While there is no legal binding to the oath there is still a legal equivalent in modern times in medical malpractice.
Would it not be better to have the medical profession making decisions under this standard for abortion, rather than make abortion a political football?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_ethics
A common framework used when analysing medical ethics is the "four principles" approach postulated by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in their textbook Principles of Biomedical Ethics. It recognizes four basic moral principles, which are to be judged and weighed against each other, with attention given to the scope of their application. The four principles are:[24]
- Respect for autonomy – the patient has the right to refuse or choose their treatment.[25]
- Beneficence – a practitioner should act in the best interest of the patient.[25]
- Non-maleficence – to not be the cause of harm. Also, "Utility" – to promote more good than harm.[25]
- Justice – concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment.[25]
The practice of ethical standards is not a choice in the medical profession as committees of ethical practices do have powers to ban people from practicing. Many medical schools still administer a version of a modern hippocratic oath. While there is no legal binding to the oath there is still a legal equivalent in modern times in medical malpractice.
Would it not be better to have the medical profession making decisions under this standard for abortion, rather than make abortion a political football?