• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The phony "Proof That The TEA Party IS NOT Racist!" video

Badda bing badda boom. lol

So what is the agenda of the tea party movement? Everytime I see someone on tv speak for the tea party it's always either vague (follow the constitution) or conspiratorial (government tyranny) or so radical (destroy social security, medicare, federal reserve, etc) or violent (bullet in the head) that I think the country is losing it's grasp on reality.

Tea Party Lights Fuse for Rebellion on Right
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/us/politics/16teaparty.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp

Why not just cut the chase and nominate Alex Jones for president?
Following the Constitution is vague?

And when has anyone speaking in an official capacity for the Tea Party ever said "bullet to the head"?

I know you won't prove it, like always. I thought I'd just throw that out there if there's anyone left who actually takes your delusional ranting seriously.
 
Just because the "tea party" denounces these slimes publicly.. the idiotic idea that they will kill the 1964 civil rights act attracts scum ball racists votes. It doesn't matter if the "tea party" is racist officially or not they want to enact racist social policy. This is what they mean when they say the republican party has gone to its roots.. and it's not good. Conservatism/libertarianism feathers the nest for this kind of mentality
Repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act is not "enacting racist social policy." Did you even take the five minutes required to understand the argument, or did you just choose to turn off your brain and whip out the "WASISM!!!1!" card?

Nevermind, I already know the answer to that.
 
The video reminds me of this:
ashley-todd.jpg

That reminds me of all the people who always felt they had to say something like... Well, I don't like Obama for all these reasons, and just because I won't be voting for him- it doesn't make me a racist.

Well.. no ****

I never understood why some people had to say that... but I do know where I lived people would say, I am not voting for no n- er. Spotting the difference between the racists and non racists was easy as that.

hmmm... just seems to be symptom of people failing to admit racism exists and taking it personally. I don't get it. Just admit there was racist supporting McCain, it's common sense and get over it.. Nobody is going to automatically think you are one just because you're voting McCain..
 
Last edited:
Repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act is not "enacting racist social policy." Did you even take the five minutes required to understand the argument, or did you just choose to turn off your brain and whip out the "WASISM!!!1!" card?

First, I seriously doubt the 1964 CRA can be repealed for the simple reason too many Congress folks don't have the spine for it.

Second, the only way to get rid of racism is to get rid of all racism including institutionalized racism such as government quotas. The idea of righting past wrongs is a very good one but when it involves wronging others in order to do it, that's not so good.
 
lets see if I understand the OP

Reverend Wright was a strong supporter of the Obama Campaign. Reverend Wright was a personal friend of Obama.

Reverend Wright is a vicious racist scumbag who hates America in general and white Americans in particular

Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama. Bill Ayers gave Obama Political advice. Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama

Bill Ayers is a communist terrorist nutcase

THEREFORE since the Obama campaign and the movement to elect Obama featured members of that inner circle who are racist haters of whites and communist terrorists, , the MOVEMENT TO ELECT OBAMA hates whites and is a communist terrorist front.
 
Following the Constitution is vague?
Note the advice to Republicans not to give speeches on the particulars of the constitution when campaigning.....

Republicans: Enlist, but Avoid Speeches on the Constitution
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/weekinreview/19zernike.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

And when has anyone speaking in an official capacity for the Tea Party ever said "bullet to the head"?

Sharron Angle threatened to use "second amendment remedies"......

Angle: I feel that the Second Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms for our citizenry. This not for someone who's in the military. This not for law enforcement. This is for us. And in fact when you read that Constitution and the founding fathers, they intended this to stop tyranny. This is for us when our government becomes tyrannical...

Manders: If we needed it at any time in history, it might be right now.

Angle: "Well it's to defend ourselves. And you know, I'm hoping that we're not getting to Second Amendment remedies. I hope the vote will be the cure for the Harry Reid problems."
Sharron Angle Floated '2nd Amendment Remedies' As 'Cure' For 'The Harry Reid Problems'

And a recent email to Chairman of the Delaware Republican Party, Tom Ross....

"The threat, issued in the form of an email, told chairman Tom Ross that he deserves "a bullet in the head" for backing "political ass-kissing RINO's" [Republicans in name only]....."
Tom Ross, Delaware GOP Chair, Threatened With 'Bullet In The Head'

And then there's the milita aspect of the tea party....

Stephen Herrington: Oklahoma to Sponsor Tea Party Militia?

Did you note the mention of John Birch Society in the above link, Coronodo?

This is tea party candidate, Kristi Allen-Gailushas running for office in Helena Montana. Her facebook page says, “The Gay community wants a war. They’ve got one!!”
Picture-19-270x300.png

City Lights: Members of Tea Party spewing hate

That sure is a grizzly looking mama. LOL

Tea Party Movement And Militias: A Threat To Democracy*|*PoliticalArticles.NET

I know you won't prove it, like always. I thought I'd just throw that out there if there's anyone left who actually takes your delusional ranting seriously.
Well as usual, you're wrong.
 
lets see if I understand the OP

Reverend Wright was a strong supporter of the Obama Campaign. Reverend Wright was a personal friend of Obama.

Reverend Wright is a vicious racist scumbag who hates America in general and white Americans in particular

Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama. Bill Ayers gave Obama Political advice. Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama

Bill Ayers is a communist terrorist nutcase

THEREFORE since the Obama campaign and the movement to elect Obama featured members of that inner circle who are racist haters of whites and communist terrorists, , the MOVEMENT TO ELECT OBAMA hates whites and is a communist terrorist front.

Yeah baby, beat that dead horse with all the fallacious reasoning you can muster.

beatdeadhorse.gif
 
Yeah baby, beat that dead horse with all the fallacious reasoning you can muster.

beatdeadhorse.gif

yeah libs see guilt by association as valid for smearing the right but deny it when their messiah associates with scum

dead horse has nothing to do with it-showing hypocrisy-priceless
 
lets see if I understand the OP

Reverend Wright was a strong supporter of the Obama Campaign. Reverend Wright was a personal friend of Obama.

Reverend Wright is a vicious racist scumbag who hates America in general and white Americans in particular

Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama. Bill Ayers gave Obama Political advice. Bill Ayers is a friend of Obama

Bill Ayers is a communist terrorist nutcase

THEREFORE since the Obama campaign and the movement to elect Obama featured members of that inner circle who are racist haters of whites and communist terrorists, , the MOVEMENT TO ELECT OBAMA hates whites and is a communist terrorist front.
If you got that out of the OP, you are seriously deluded. Seek help. :2razz:
 
yeah libs see guilt by association as valid for smearing the right but deny it when their messiah associates with scum

dead horse has nothing to do with it-showing hypocrisy-priceless


Sorry.. but if this guilt by association thing worked so well, then Obama wouldn't have won the election. I thought it was a bs campaign move, because it didn't accomplish ANYTHING. I think McCain should have went with Obama's lack of experience and how he voted present most of time. He couldn't make his mind up on the important issues. That really bothered me.. hearing Sarah pulling that "he pals around with terrorists" didn't really bother me that much.. I thought they should have attacked Obama directly, not indirectly.. weak
 
Note the advice to Republicans not to give speeches on the particulars of the constitution when campaigning.....

Republicans: Enlist, but Avoid Speeches on the Constitution
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/weekinreview/19zernike.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
That was the reporter's opinion. Hardly an official directive from either the GOP or the Tea Party.

Sharron Angle threatened to use "second amendment remedies"......
Can you read? The first sentence of the article:
The Oklahoma Tea Party movement goes renegade state [...]
They have been exiled from the national movement.
And a recent email to Chairman of the Delaware Republican Party, Tom Ross....
Source?
And then there's the milita aspect of the tea party....

Stephen Herrington: Oklahoma to Sponsor Tea Party Militia?
See above.

Did you note the mention of John Birch Society in the above link, Coronodo?
Yeah, I know it's just all one big conspiracy. :roll:

his is tea party candidate, Kristi Allen-Gailushas running for office in Helena Montana. Her facebook page says, “The Gay community wants a war. They’ve got one!!”
Picture-19-270x300.png

City Lights: Members of Tea Party spewing hate

That sure is a grizzly looking mama. LOL

Tea Party Movement And Militias: A Threat To Democracy*|*PoliticalArticles.NET
She's no longer part of the Tea Party.

Well as usual, you're wrong.
Nope, once again it's you who are delusional. Color me shocked ...
 
If you got that out of the OP, you are seriously deluded. Seek help. :2razz:

sorry-people like me tend to be self reliant-its the left who need government help

and the analogy was patently obvious. but you missed that

hmmmm
 
Sorry.. but if this guilt by association thing worked so well, then Obama wouldn't have won the election. I thought it was a bs campaign move, because it didn't accomplish ANYTHING. I think McCain should have went with Obama's lack of experience and how he voted present most of time. He couldn't make his mind up on the important issues. That really bothered me.. hearing Sarah pulling that "he pals around with terrorists" didn't really bother me that much.. I thought they should have attacked Obama directly, not indirectly.. weak

that is fairly accurate-good points
 
What are you talking about? MLK's niece is going to be there giving tribute to her uncle. Is she racist? Is she spitting on the Memorial and MLK?

....outta work maybe?
 
NOT RACIST. Tolerant. we got a witch on our ticket! Libertarian lite. The new teapartynation.
 
what liberals do to their partners is totally irrelevant and off topic. The discussion is about the Tea Party. Keep your nasty perversions to yourself.

While some of the Tea Party members can be a little disturbing sometimes, they did one of the most amazingly delightful things I've seen in a long time: A movement that started as "astroturf", clearly an attempt at re-branding by the Republican Party (Now with 100% less gay Family Values Republicans!), paid for by the same wealth that usually aligns on the right, just went ahead and acted like it was their movement and ran off and started doing their own thing. I love it, that was awesome! And while I may not agree with any of your positions, and the Founders would probably really not like a couple of them, I can tell you now they would have approved of your actions in this case the same as I: with nod and a little smile. You should be proud of yourselves.
 
The healthcare debate was a muck.. Palin and others decrying fake death panels.. seriously. What a pack of liars.

Especially, when the insurance companies have actual rooms for people to sit in and decide if they want to pay or let you die, and another that is filled with people whose job it is to go through your entire record with a magnifying glass, as soon as you get expensively sick, trying to find any excuse to drop you from your policy. And they don't single out the old for this either, they are equal opportunity murderers, everybody's eligible from birth, to die for their bottom line.
That's right folks, actual, real life death panels operating while they were actually speaking. Why didn't Jesus let her hear their cries? She surely would have run to their defense as well.

Oh wait, I apologize, I forgot it was the fact that Obama was trying to give those old people" free" death panels, those other people "worked" to pay for theirs, that was the issue, damn socialist President. My bad.
 
Last edited:
That was the reporter's opinion. Hardly an official directive from either the GOP or the Tea Party.
Well then, who is the official directive for the tea party? And no, it wasn't the reporters opinion, it was political analyist, Stuart Rothberg.

The tea partiers say they want to follow the constitution, but they also say they want to change it. My point still stands, the tea party are vage and clueless about the constitution.

Can you read? The first sentence of the article:They have been exiled from the national movement.
What does that have to do with Sharon Angle threatening to use the second amendment? My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.

See above.
See what above? You haven't disputed a single point I've made with any evidence. My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.

Can you read? I provided the source. You still haven't disputed a single point I made with any evidence. My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.

Yeah, I know it's just all one big conspiracy. :roll:
I never said it was a conspiracy, but you certainly have. Besides, I have the facts to back up my claims, what do you have besides a snotty attitude?
The tea party didn't kick her out and they are still endorsing her as their candidate. You still haven't disproven any of the points I"ve made. My point still stands about the tea party threats to use violence.

Nope, once again it's you who are delusional. Color me shocked ...
Petty insults and name calling? Is that the best you can do?

Typical con. :roll:
 
Well then, who is the official directive for the tea party? And no, it wasn't the reporters opinion, it was political analyist, Stuart Rothberg.
It's still his opinion. Do you know what an opinion is?

The tea partiers say they want to follow the constitution, but they also say they want to change it. My point still stands, the tea party are vage and clueless about the constitution.
Delusion.

What does that have to do with Sharon Angle threatening to use the second amendment? My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.
She's not a part of the Tea Party. Another delusion.

See what above? You haven't disputed a single point I've made with any evidence. My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.
Another of your delusions.

Can you read? I provided the source. You still haven't disputed a single point I made with any evidence. My point still stands about the tea party threatening to use violence.
Link to your source.

I never said it was a conspiracy, but you certainly have. Besides, I have the facts to back up my claims, what do you have besides a snotty attitude?
Your links didn't prove anything you said. Delusion.
The tea party didn't kick her out and they are still endorsing her as their candidate. You still haven't disproven any of the points I"ve made. My point still stands about the tea party threats to use violence.
READ THE ****ING LINK. Maybe it will disabuse you of your delusion, but somehow I doubt it.

Petty insults and name calling? Is that the best you can do?
If I've insulted you or called you a name, report it. Otherwise, get the **** over it.

So far you haven't seen the best I can do, because it hasn't taken that much to let the air out of your ridiculous delusions.

Typical con. :roll:
Yet another delusion. I'm shocked. :sarcasticclap
 
I want to know why liberals who spend so much time trying to prove the tea party is racist, don't try to get paid for it. To my knowledge there is still a $100,000 reward for anyone who can show a congressman was spat at and called the N word in a group of thousands with cell phones.
That would prove to people that our congressmen weren't lying and that the tea party does indeed have some racists among them.

I thought the Tea Party wasn't a legitimate party, and a flash in the pan with no chance of putting any legitmate candidates up for election.

:poke
 
While some of the Tea Party members can be a little disturbing sometimes, they did one of the most amazingly delightful things I've seen in a long time: A movement that started as "astroturf", clearly an attempt at re-branding by the Republican Party (Now with 100% less gay Family Values Republicans!), paid for by the same wealth that usually aligns on the right, just went ahead and acted like it was their movement and ran off and started doing their own thing. I love it, that was awesome! And while I may not agree with any of your positions, and the Founders would probably really not like a couple of them, I can tell you now they would have approved of your actions in this case the same as I: with nod and a little smile. You should be proud of yourselves.



You just make it up as you go along. :thumbs:
 
Especially, when the insurance companies have actual rooms for people to sit in and decide if they want to pay or let you die, and another that is filled with people whose job it is to go through your entire record with a magnifying glass, as soon as you get expensively sick, trying to find any excuse to drop you from your policy. And they don't single out the old for this either, they are equal opportunity murderers, everybody's eligible from birth, to die for their bottom line.
That's right folks, actual, real life death panels operating while they were actually speaking. Why didn't Jesus let her hear their cries? She surely would have run to their defense as well.

Oh wait, I apologize, I forgot it was the fact that Obama was trying to give those old people" free" death panels, those other people "worked" to pay for theirs, that was the issue, damn socialist President. My bad.
Sources????
 
It's still his opinion. Do you know what an opinion is?

Delusion.

She's not a part of the Tea Party. Another delusion.

Another of your delusions.

Link to your source.

Your links didn't prove anything you said. Delusion.
READ THE ****ING LINK. Maybe it will disabuse you of your delusion, but somehow I doubt it.

If I've insulted you or called you a name, report it. Otherwise, get the **** over it.

So far you haven't seen the best I can do, because it hasn't taken that much to let the air out of your ridiculous delusions.

Yet another delusion. I'm shocked. :sarcasticclap
Well aren't you the clever one dismissing every point with ridicule, insults and name calling. Are you daring me to report you?
 
Well aren't you the clever one dismissing every point with ridicule, insults and name calling. Are you daring me to report you?
Do whatever you think is necessary, now that you've admitted you can't prove anything.
 
Back
Top Bottom