• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The parable of the loaves and fishes

How low can you sink that you have to politicize the Bible? All you conservative Christians, shame on you.
 
I've posted multiple articles verifying my posts.
Unfortunately, these articles are many times supressed by the very same corporate entities you say you get information from.
Prove it. Words are cheap.

After all, fact is fact and no matter the political bias, fact cannot be changed.

The reality is that I have read hundreds of your posts and have yet found any where you actually did what you are saying on this post.

Then of course, reality can be different from one person to the next. A person that does not believe in morals, ethics, principles and humanity can never be accused and found guilty of being immoral, unethical, unprincipled and inhumane because in his world those are not negatives.

Before any debate becomes a true debate, the playing field needs to be determined beforehand. Then again, I have no desire to talk or communicate with anyone that has no morals, ethics, principles or humanity. Perhaps those basics-of-life are not important to you. If they aren't, let me know and we can end all conversations between us in the future.
 
Prove it. Words are cheap.

After all, fact is fact and no matter the political bias, fact cannot be changed.

The reality is that I have read hundreds of your posts and have yet found any where you actually did what you are saying on this post.

Then of course, reality can be different from one person to the next. A person that does not believe in morals, ethics, principles and humanity can never be accused and found guilty of being immoral, unethical, unprincipled and inhumane because in his world those are not negatives.

Before any debate becomes a true debate, the playing field needs to be determined beforehand. Then again, I have no desire to talk or communicate with anyone that has no morals, ethics, principles or humanity. Perhaps those basics-of-life are not important to you. If they aren't, let me know and we can end all conversations between us in the future.

Communists have no God, therefore, "morals" is just a word they use.
It doesn't surprise me that most of you commies don't realise the dogma you post is actually Marxism.
After all, it was part of your indoctrination to deny any connection to communism.
 
Communists have no God, therefore, "morals" is just a word they use.
It doesn't surprise me that most of you commies don't realise the dogma you post is actually Marxism.
After all, it was part of your indoctrination to deny any connection to communism.
Wow, what a statement. Could you provide support for your statements?

1) Communists have no God
2) Communists have no morals
3) My dogma is Marxism?
4) I was indoctrinated into Communism?

C'mon, be a debater and prove each and every one of your points.

Remember, words are cheap. Anyone can say them, even idiots that know nothing.
 
Wow, what a statement. Could you provide support for your statements?

1) Communists have no God
2) Communists have no morals
3) My dogma is Marxism?
4) I was indoctrinated into Communism?

C'mon, be a debater and prove each and every one of your points.

Remember, words are cheap. Anyone can say them, even idiots that know nothing.
  1. Marx said that religion is the opiate of the people. The Soviet Union and its satellite nations openly persecuted the church.
  2. You misquoted what was said in the previous quote, which stated that morals was just a word. The implication is that Marxists have no code of morality based on religious principles. Morality based on force and the threat of force we can clearly see.
  3. You clearly equate Marxism and communism. Most do. Are you self-identifying as Marxist?
  4. Again, your is used in the plural. He has you on the denying connection to communism.

Why should he prove points? You (singular) generally do not.
 
and how many of the people you help feed do you believe are just "taking advantage of the program to get free food"? What percentage of those people are just lazy bums that use the system to eat and get free stuff?
Well why dont you come down and get your hands dirty and find out instead of bloviating on the internet about how awesome you are
 
It's sad then that you have such a poor attitude about the kind of people who show up to the food bank. Do you think those people getting free food from your food bank stop busting their asses because of the food you give them?
Well why don’t you come down and get your hands dirty and deliver some meals to homeless in dangerous neighborhoods instead of shitting on the attitudes of those who do
 
Well why don’t you come down and get your hands dirty and deliver some meals to homeless in dangerous neighborhoods instead of shitting on the attitudes of those who do

I'm not trying to shit on anyone, only trying to understand why someone who works at a food bank and uses their spare time to deliver meals to homeless people would be so uncompassionate and make it about socialism or whatever point you were trying to make in your OP about people who seek free food. Surely, if you are doing this three times a week you don't see them as lazy bums who are homeless just because you are there with a free meal?
 
Well why dont you come down and get your hands dirty and find out instead of bloviating on the internet about how awesome you are

Why don't you quit volunteering at a food bank if, according to your very own logic, those people would be working their butts off at a job if you weren't there with free food?
 
The OP is just so original!

 
Well why dont you come down and get your hands dirty and find out instead of bloviating on the internet about how awesome you are
You did not answer the question but deflected.

Since you are down in the field of game (feeding poor people) but generally are against help services for the poor because you say that the poor take advantage (you OP), then you should have first hand knowledge. Tell us.............are the people you are helping to feed there to take advantage of the program? Are they lazy bums that could work but decide not to?

C'mon, be a debater and answer!
 
Well why dont you come down and get your hands dirty and find out instead of bloviating on the internet about how awesome you are
Your OP stated:

"
Jesus was delivering the Sermon on the Mount. The farmers in the village flocked to see him.
One of the apostles said to Jesus. "We don't have enough food to feed the masses"

Jesus replied :" GO the village and command that the baker and the fish merchant give you their loaves and fishes, for they have plenty. Take it, but explain that it is for the greater good"
After a few weeks of that the farmers stooped working their crops,figuring" Why should I bust my ass farming when I get just go get free food from Jesus"
The bakers and fish merchants stopped fishing and baking figuring" why should I bust my ass baking and fishing when they are just going to take the fruits of my labor"
The apostle said to Jesus: " The people are starving can you do something"
Jesus replied : " What am I ? Jesus the miracle caterer? I'm here to save souls,"
"But can't you miraculously produce loaves and fishes?"
" YOu believe that shit ? LAFF. I'm just a dude with a good rap"
Everybody starved"

So are you Jesus or Judas?
 
Why don't you quit volunteering at a food bank if, according to your very own logic, those people would be working their butts off at a job if you weren't there with free food?

The OP is just so original!


yeah. Sam. Great guy, and very funny ,but extremely funny at times. He stole my stuff all the time, but I've forgiven him. You should too.
 
Why don't you quit volunteering at a food bank if, according to your very own logic, those people would be working their butts off at a job if you weren't there with free food?
The purpose of the post was to point out the law of unintended consequences. If you tax capital, you get less investment and less economic growth. If you subsidize not working , you disincentivize working. Although some people don't work out of sheer laziness, I don't think that is a significant factor. It's not really a matter of laziness as much as it is human nature to take the easier path.(generality).
The idea that taxing the rich and redistributing it to the poor has no unintended (negative )consequences seems to be a foreign concept to many Democrats.

The place where I volunteer gives out bare subsistence so I doubt people aren't working because of that.
 
Back
Top Bottom