lol, Rome died because he tried to acquire too much power. Because of all the land it had, it couldn't defend all its boundaries. It's borders got too big, it's army too large and expensive, etc. etc.
Rome died because sooner or later it had to but the catalyst for its collapse was miscegenation which had reduced the Aryan-Roman core of the empire and allowed itself to implode,though the various aspects of its fall were complex and occured over a very long period of time.
You can only use power if you have power. But in any case, describe what the book was talking about, and what Churchill did to get you all uptight.
Churchill is generally regarded as a war mongerer and was so even before the second world war.If you know anything about his history you will know that this is so.All he cared about along with Blair and Bush is making a name for himself,to make his mark in history.He was willing to allow the British Empire to be destroyed and Europe to fall into ruins purely for the persuit of a needless war.His war did not have a political goal apart from winning.Only a lunatic or a traitor would persue a war on such a basis.
States as a rule do not or should not persue war unless that state will gain from it and it has a reasonable chance of securing its goals.
Britain,even if it had known in advance that it would win the war could not gain anything tangible from a victory.It destroyed itself far more thoroughly than Hitler could have achieved or wanted to achieve.
Therefore Churchill was a traitor.We owe the current multiculti shithole to that arsehole`s race treason.
No, you don't let people have their own opinions. For example, we have a difference in opinion in the state's purpose. You can't accept my purpose for the state, yet I can see yours, even if I disagree with it. And you again show your ignorance. I am not a liberal, so know the facts before you speak. If anything, I am more conservative.
On the contrary I am allowing you to have an opinion and to express it openly.My detractors by and large [not all of them] have tried to defame my reputation and would seek,if they had the power, to ensure that people such as myself either did not exist or were prevented from expressing our views.I have been labelled homosexual,insane and evil all for expressing a contrary view.I don`t call that liberal and that if anything is "ignorant".They,not I are the real fascists,the real hate-mongers.
The only reason we are talking about the Old Testament is that you wanted to prove how the Jews are to blame for Germany's troubles. Prove it through means other than the Old Testament.
I have posted evidence from the Internet and other sources and it has either been ignored,ridiculed or attacked without anyone addressing the actual issues raised.Most of my opponents have attacked my character and have ignored the issues at hand.They must be really afraid.
Description of a "pure" Aryan; From a leaflet of the Nazi Race, 1929.
"The Aryan race is tall, long legged, slim. The race is narrow-faced, with a narrow forehead, a narrow high built nose and a lower jaw and prominent chin, the skin is rosy bright and the blood shines through...the hair is smooth, straight, or wavy-possibly curly in childhood. The colour is blond."[/QUOTE]
I suggest that you post some evidence that is more specific than "leaflet of the Nazi Race,1929".Sources please!
