• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Newly Emboldened American Racist

True. I think what makes her the lesser of the evils here is that she is at least a known quantity and can be worked with, with trump no one knows what he stands for or would actually do if elected, keep in mind that he supported the ban on AR's and longer waiting period to purchase guns and supports raising the taxes te rich pay, both very unRepublican like and his entire past has been supporting Liberal ideals. I cannot see many Conservatives actually voting for Hillary but that does not mean they will vote for Trump as he does not share their values. So while Hillary will not gain all that much cross over votes trump will not be getting many and will not have the support of many Conservatives. Being that any GOP candidate for the Whitehouse starts out in a hole, fewer firm electoral college votes, and that Trump will be hard pressed to win any swing states it is almost a given to what the outcome will be. Pray for the best, Prepare for the worst.

She's a known quanity, alright. Its well known that she's a neo-communist.
 
She's a known quanity, alright. Its well known that she's a neo-communist.

Well then, you might want to re-evaluate what you think you "know".
 
Well then, you might want to re-evaluate what you think you "know".

No...there's no need. We already know she's a big government shill. She's lived off of government her entire adult life.
 
Of course you are. You ignore the animals that riot at Trump rallies.

Really? That must be why I wrote:

Yes, they have to police the area and arrest and detain people who cause issues and that could make the use of tear gas, pepper spray and non-lethal weapons necessary. But crack skulls? I am not sure the police need that level of violence but yes, actions have to be made to stop violent protest.

And animals :roll: you see that kind of :bs stops any diversity from getting into the republican party. And if there are any animals it is the idiots who post racist attacks on 17 year old black teens.
 
If Trump has proven anything, it's that even if political correctness goes to far sometimes, it has helped make people feel ashamed for saying racist garbage. Now that he's convinced those people that PC is always wrong, we see that America hasn't come a long way at all on the racial front.

PC comes from Eastern Europe. Its purpose is to undermine Western civilization. Any student of history knows about the Frankfurt school. It works by transferring blame to the victim. In this case the major religion of our country. And it promotes moral relativity which contains 0 truths. Or at least that is what Socrates said, but being one of the fathers of Western civilization what good is he?
 
Really? That must be why I wrote:



And animals :roll: you see that kind of :bs stops any diversity from getting into the republican party. And if there are any animals it is the idiots who post racist attacks on 17 year old black teens.

I don't want those clowns in the Republican party. The Democrats are welcome to them...lol
 
But one cannot deny that part of the Trump/republican electorate is racially intolerant/racists. But as said, just part of the electorate, not all of them or even most of them.
The fact is that you have no idea who posted what you quoted, what political party they belong to, who is 'intolerant/racist', or anything of that nature. Smear politics is common enough in elections and you're just another who is falling for this stuff.
 
Anyone wonder how many of those responses are pure trolls, poe's, or just plain fakes to stir the hornet's nest?

Don't believe everything you read on the internet.

Why do you folks on the right deny that there is a core group of racists that share your philosophy? Just admit it.
 
I don't want those clowns in the Republican party. The Democrats are welcome to them...lol

Yes, but they have a natural home in the Republican Party.
 
This kind of post really disgusts me.

You use those sleazy tactics of trying to associate Trump with Duke, even though there is zero connection between the two. Here's a connection. Democrat Majority Leader, Robert Byrd. Elected by democrats to office, and by his peers to lead them, the Exalted Cyclops of the KKK. Not a secret to any of them.

Of course Hillary has no connection, except saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd.”

Whoa, is that the same Hillary that is running right now??? Wow, how did that escape the HuffPo's unbiased scope? You also left it out.

You say part of the Republican party has "racist tendencies" because Trump didn't disavow Duke within 30 seconds. Well, at least he didn't heap praise all over him and call him his mentor! That's quite a special bubble you're in.

Personally I find this kind of post really obnoxious.

There is nothing sleazy to write what Duke said about Trump or the idiotic denial of Trump that he did not know who Duke or white supremacists are.

Also, I did not associate Trump with Duke, I merely claimed (quite correctly) that Trump was a lying sack of manure when he said:

Trump: Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke. OK? I don’t know anything about what you’re even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists. So, I don’t know.

And I also quite correctly wrote that David Duke supports Trump for president? As does the KKK.

I am also not saying that Trump wants to be connected to Duke or the KKK but reality says that the KKK and Duke want to support Donald Trump as their standard bearer for the white European values and heritage that they hold so dear and that they believe Trump also believes wholeheartedly.

:lamo Robert Byrd :lamo first making a fiar and a reasonable point and then going into the ridiculous narrative that hardly has any validity in 2016.

Yes, Byrd was a racist in the time that the democratic party was a bunch of racist asswipes and republicanism stood for human decency and human rights. Sadly the 2 parties have swapped places when it comes to where the parties are strongest and also partly as to the ideas of intolerance. Now it is the republican party who rules the deep South and looking at the bathroom bill that intolerant streak is still alive and kicking, as it is intolerance pure and simple.

Also, Byrd changed his KKK views and supported human rights later on in life.
 
If that happens and Hillary wins, the country is ****ed.

Hilarious, Hillary may not be the greatest president the US will ever have but compared to Donald Trump she is 100 times better/more superior. You seem to be turning things upside down, the real disaster will happen when Trump wins the presidency because the man has few morals, few values and has no presidential bone in his body.
 
This stuff has been on the internet since forever. There's nothing new about it, and it's not specific to this campaign season or to this president.

Perhaps liberals just started looking for it in order to bash Trump.

People who never talk to Trump supporters and who don't know what Trump supporters are really like can get some pretty silly ideas about them. Astonishing when close to 50% of the population is alienated from the elite to the point that they, the elite, admit they don't know any of them and have no freeking idea what their concerns are.

You do not have to look far to find something to bash Trump with, me I use the comment about McCain being a looser as he was a POW, rather insulting to folks like me that served. I will pass on the Donald, as will many Vets that i know. Some comments can not be glossed over.

What was Trump doing while McCain was sitting in a rice paddy cell? Oh ya, filling out yet another deferment.

I would love to see the Trump supporters defend this comment, but they do not, nor should they.
 
Last edited:
Hilarious, Hillary may not be the greatest president the US will ever have but compared to Donald Trump she is 100 times better/more superior. You seem to be turning things upside down, the real disaster will happen when Trump wins the presidency because the man has few morals, few values and has no presidential bone in his body.

She's going to follow Obama's agenda. Obama is official the worst President in American history. So, that means she's going to be a disaster.

Clinton hasn't accomplished one damn thing in her life, nothing, ever. She's sucked the government tit her entire adult life.

Yeah, I know, you're going to say, "nuh-uhhhhh!" So, show us one thing she's done.
 
Last edited:
She's going to follow Obama's agenda. Obama is official the worst President in American history. So, that means she's going to be a disaster.

Club to hasn't accomplished one damn thing in her life, nothing, ever. She's sucked the government tit her entire adult life.

Yeah, I know, you're going to say, "nuh-uhhhhh!" So, show us one thing she's done.

When you were compiling that list of the worst Pres, did you factor in GW?
 
When you were compiling that list of the worst Pres, did you factor in GW?

Bush 43 didn't throw up the fourth worst GDP in history, the worst overall GDP growth in history, the worst labor participation rate in 40 years and the highest debt in history. So...no, I didn't.
 
Bush 43 didn't throw up the fourth worst GDP in history, the worst overall GDP growth in history, the worst labor participation rate in 40 years and the highest debt in history. So...no, I didn't.

But he did send guys like me into Iraqi without proper gear, and mismanaged the post invasion, getting lots of my buddies wounded and killed, perhaps you should include him. After all, lets not be partisan with the list.
 
But he did send guys like me into Iraqi without proper gear, and mismanaged the post invasion, getting lots of my buddies wounded and killed, perhaps you should include him.

What improper gear did you have?

The mismanaged occupation is a legitimate issue. I'll agree with that. How well has Obama handled the withdrawal? A troop got killed last week. In sure he won't be the last. Imagine if we had just stayed?
 
What improper gear did you have?

The mismanaged occupation is a legitimate issue. I'll agree with that. How well has Obama handled the withdrawal? A troop got killed last week. In sure he won't be the last. Imagine if we had just stayed?

I had to buy my own body armor as Bush was trying to run a war on the cheap, but that is ok It only costs a few hundred lives, whats that in relation to the GDP, not a thing, we know were your priorities lay, dollars and cents. Perhaps if you had seen Bush's screw up first hand, witnessed your buddies taking flak in the gut, and those guts laying in your hands because the poor E2 could not afford the body armor, due to having 2 kids at home you would be inclined to include him on the list of worst Pres, or does he get a free pass? And my story is common, lots of us experienced Bush's folly, dumb ass frat boy and chief!! There is no other man worthy of the title worst Pres than the GOP's last boy in the job.
 
Last edited:
I had to buy my own body armor as Bush was trying to run a war on the cheap, but thats ok It only costs a few hundred lives, whats that in relation to the GDP, not a thing, we know were your priorities lay. Perhaps if you had seen Bush's screw up first hand you would be inclined to include him on the list of worst Pres, or does he get a free pass?

Yeah, I heard that story. You had to buy body armor because you weren't issued body armor, or you just didn't like the body armor you were issued?
 
And I also quite correctly wrote that David Duke supports Trump for president? As does the KKK.
And what significance to you find in that?
Yes, Byrd was a racist in the time that the democratic party was a bunch of racist asswipes and republicanism stood for human decency and human rights. Sadly the 2 parties have swapped places
So they just 'swapped places'. One party decided to suddenly become racist while the other party, following over a century of pro-slavery and Jim Crow suddenly decided to become tolerant. What a fantastic turn of events!!
Now it is the republican party who rules the deep South and looking at the bathroom bill that intolerant streak is still alive and kicking, as it is intolerance pure and simple.
I doubt anyone would be interested in what the Dutch have to say about public toilets.Public toilets: A Dutch inconvenience | Insider Views | Expatica the Netherlands
Also, Byrd changed his KKK views and supported human rights later on in life.
Yeah, sure.
 
Hence my statement that it was a racist section in the US emboldened by Trump and the tone of his campaign and his reluctance from distancing himself from David Duke and the white supremacist movement who clearly support Trump.

And what exactly does prejudice against large corporations and communism have to do with racism (part of which I view is antisemitism).

It has a lot to do with it. People hate differently. Also, I don't think there is any validity whatsoever to your claim that Trump was reluctant to distance himself from the Klan. If some crazy group decides to support a candidate, that doesn't really reflect on the candidate.
 
MOS and unit and dates in country?

I was Air Force, three tours on escort duty, I volunteered for my last tour. You still want to leave Bush2 off that list?
 
Back
Top Bottom