• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The newest voter suppression tactic by the GOP and Trump!!

independentusa said:
First they introduced voter ID to solve a non-existent problem.Then they purged millions of eligible voters off the rolls in Dem areas. Then they reduced the number of polling stations in Dem areas or moved them to a place too far for those in Dem ares to reach. Now the latest voter suppression tactic is to eliminate mail in voting. When will it end, when you can only vote if you are a registered GOP voter and only GOP candidates are allowed on the ballots. That is what they essentially have in Russia and China, a one party system, so I guess that is what trump wants. Trump has told us outright, if the GOP does not do this they can lose elections. As I have written often, the GOP has become the party of win at any cost, even to our democracy.
Click to expand...

Party over country is their mantra.
 
independentusa said:
trouble13 said:
Poor lil progressives pouting over not being allowed to continue voting for a week after the election is over. My heart bleeds over how the mean ole gop bullies you all.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk[/QUOTE
Only a really, really dumb Trumpster would believe I am talking about the Wisco election in this OP. I am talking about 10 years of the GOP trying to suppress anyone who might not vote GOP. Can you actually read? I mean, did I even mention the Wisco election, NO. But a trumpster can only see how every OP is either pro or anti Trump. Piltiful!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Trumpsters are pitiful.
Click to expand...
 
Condor060 said:
So you want to eliminate the electoral college
Allow illegals to vote
Pack the SCOTUS
And regulate free speech

And you think that is upholding the constitution?

Its why a Democrat will not hold the office of president for a long time.
Click to expand...

You show why the Dems are going to take total power: you are a typical GOP voter.

NPV does not eliminate the EC. Cite where I said illegals should vote. Congress has the constitutional right to increase or take away seats of SCOTUS. Deliberate lying is protected free speech.
 
Helix said:
Democrats are going to have to stop pretending that this isn't happening and fight back with equal force.
Click to expand...

I think we should consider responding with disproportionate force.
 
trouble13 said:
Poor lil progressives pouting over not being allowed to continue voting for a week after the election is over. My heart bleeds over how the mean ole gop bullies you all.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

WOW that's your reaction?? SAD
 
Bullseye said:
How many of those 60+ million were actually alive and eligible.
Click to expand...
The only case of felony fraud with mail-in ballots in 2018 was with Republicans in North Carolina, remember?
 
jamesbyoung said:
You show why the Dems are going to take total power: you are a typical GOP voter.

NPV does not eliminate the EC. Cite where I said illegals should vote. Congress has the constitutional right to increase or take away seats of SCOTUS. Deliberate lying is protected free speech.
Click to expand...

jamesbyoung said:
.

Expand voting rights and opportunities.
Click to expand...

Expand voting rights to who?

Ensure the NPV passes.
Click to expand...

How do you have a popular vote and the electoral college at the same time?

Increase SCOTUS seats by six.
Click to expand...

So you would be fine if we do that right now and fill those seats with Conservative judges huh. Or you just want that to happen if a Democrat comes to power?

Pass stringent criminal libel bills that will punish media and individuals that knowingly, voluntarily, and willingly lie about political agendas.
Click to expand...

That will never happen as it would wipe out all Liberal media groups but you want to control the media?

So really you want Socialism. One party rule to control everything that stops your party from gaining power like voter IDs, constitutional required electoral college to give every state representation, complete control of the SCOTUS, and stop all media that exposes loony leftist idiots for the scum they really are.
 
Condor060 said:
How do you have a popular vote and the electoral college at the same time?
Click to expand...

States agree to give their vote to the vote to the popular vote winner. You just need enough states to get to 270.
 
Bullseye said:
Got it wrong: Dems are the "win at any cost party. Which is way they're trying to whip their useful idiots into a frenzy with the garbage you faithfully regurgitate. Your masters will be proud.
Click to expand...


"Monday’s decision came from the same three-judge court that invalidated North Carolina’s gerrymander of the state Legislature in September. Following that ruling, the plaintiffs—who are backed by Eric Holder’s National Democratic Redistricting Committee—filed suit against the state’s congressional map. The court found that this plan had the same infirmities as the legislative map: GOP legislators discriminated against Democratic voters, drawing maps behind closed doors with the aid of gerrymandering guru Thomas Hofeller. Their map “packed” most into a few deep-blue districts then “cracked” the rest throughout red districts. “I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats,” the legislator in charge of redistricting declared upon presenting the plan. “So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country.”"
 
99percenter said:
States agree to give their vote to the vote to the popular vote winner. You just need enough states to get to 270.
Click to expand...

I know how it works. That would mean the electors would not vote with their states. That would mean eliminating the rights of the state voters and over ruling the constitution and its electoral college.
 
independentusa said:
First they introduced voter ID to solve a non-existent problem.
Click to expand...

Nonexistent? The Heritage Foundation cites almost 700 cases of voter fraud on their website.

John Fund has written two entire books about mostly Democrat-committed voter fraud.

Chris Mathews admitted some time back that his party regularly and broadly committed it in Phillie and elsewhere and assumed that they still do.

Anyone with eyes and a little knowledge knows that voter fraud by Democrats is their Standard Operating Procedure.
 
I think the OP means that the dimwits are getting antsy that the GOP are finally cleaning up illegal voting, that, of course translates to voter suppression, in their minds. :)


Tim-
 
Condor060 said:
Expand voting rights to who?



How do you have a popular vote and the electoral college at the same time?



So you would be fine if we do that right now and fill those seats with Conservative judges huh. Or you just want that to happen if a Democrat comes to power?



That will never happen as it would wipe out all Liberal media groups but you want to control the media?

So really you want Socialism. One party rule to control everything that stops your party from gaining power like voter IDs, constitutional required electoral college to give every state representation, complete control of the SCOTUS, and stop all media that exposes loony leftist idiots for the scum they really are.
Click to expand...

Trump is a socialist. So is the GOP. Watch the next round of support. Since the GOP suppresses the vote to keep a minority party in power that hates the People, the Democratic Party and the majority of the voters are going to have to take back this country, and they can do it constitutionally.
 
Condor060 said:
I know how it works. That would mean the electors would not vote with their states. That would mean eliminating the rights of the state voters and over ruling the constitution and its electoral college.
Click to expand...
It is not illegal or unconstitutional.

There is no substantive illegal voting.
 
Condor060 said:
I know how it works. That would mean the electors would not vote with their states. That would mean eliminating the rights of the state voters and over ruling the constitution and its electoral college.
Click to expand...

I dont think you read the constitution. It says the states have the right to allocate their votes how ever they want.
 
independentusa said:
First they introduced voter ID to solve a non-existent problem.Then they purged millions of eligible voters off the rolls in Dem areas. Then they reduced the number of polling stations in Dem areas or moved them to a place too far for those in Dem ares to reach. Now the latest voter suppression tactic is to eliminate mail in voting. When will it end, when you can only vote if you are a registered GOP voter and only GOP candidates are allowed on the ballots. That is what they essentially have in Russia and China, a one party system, so I guess that is what trump wants. Trump has told us outright, if the GOP does not do this they can lose elections. As I have written often, the GOP has become the party of win at any cost, even to our democracy.
Click to expand...

I thought leftist hated lies so why does every thread you start begin with lies?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom