• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The New York Times "stages" news events..

Stu Ghatze

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2005
Messages
531
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The New York Times Wrong Again

This is pathetic.

Whatever is happening in the U.S. shadow war in Pakistan it is clear that their photo gets it all wrong.



What is identified as the "remains of a missile" is quite clearly an artillery shell. Here's a 155mm round for comparison.
 
Last edited:
Stu Ghatze said:
The New York Times Wrong Again

This is pathetic.

Whatever is happening in the U.S. shadow war in Pakistan it is clear that their photo gets it all wrong.



What is identified as the "remains of a missile" is quite clearly an artillery shell. Here's a 155mm round for comparison.
What images?
 
Stu Ghatze said:
The New York Times Wrong Again

This is pathetic.

Whatever is happening in the U.S. shadow war in Pakistan it is clear that their photo gets it all wrong.



What is identified as the "remains of a missile" is quite clearly an artillery shell. Here's a 155mm round for comparison.
The New York Times can't help that they can't tell the difference between a "missle" and a "shell?" They are too busy accepting money from John Kerry?

I Guess Ignorance Really is Bliss! :mrgreen:
 
Yes, the New York times must have colluded with the Monks in attempt to falsify the perception of corruption and megalomania within our current government! You've figured it all out. You sir, should be an international watch dog of all things transpirational.
 
Conflict said:
Yes, the New York times must have colluded with the Monks in attempt to falsify the perception of corruption and megalomania within our current government! You've figured it all out. You sir, should be an international watch dog of all things transpirational.
I trust one one? :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom