- Joined
- Aug 6, 2019
- Messages
- 15,086
- Reaction score
- 6,810
- Location
- Bridgeport, CT
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
So here is Rand Paul commenting on Biden's push for a $15 minimum wage:
55 years ago Milton Friedman wrote an article for Newsweek regarding the new minimum wage law passed by the economic illiterate congress:
Remember, the biggest support for minimum wage laws come from the so-called "party of science", and of course, special interest groups. Jeff Bezos is a big supporter of a $15 minimum wage law. Gee, I wonder why.
And for those conservatives out there who dream of a "limited government", observe that the idiotic government can't even get something extremely simply like this right. If politicians are too stupid/evil to understand the effects of a price floor on wages, how do you expect them to accomplish something several orders of magnitude more difficult, like crafting just and efficient legal rules?
Sen. Rand Paul says Biden's push for raising minimum wage shows he hates Black teenagers
Paul told Fox News host Sean Hannity that Biden's goal of increasing the national minimum wage to $15 would cause 4 million people to lose their jobs.
www.usatoday.com
Sen. Rand Paul says Biden's push for raising minimum wage shows he hates Black teenagers
Not for the first time this week, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul took his criticisms of newly inaugurated President Joe Biden to Fox News.
Speaking with conservative personality Sean Hannity Friday night, the Republican congressman repeated his claim that Biden's goal of increasing the national minimum wage to $15 would cause 4 million people to lose their jobs.
"And the people who lose their jobs first when you hike up the minimum wage are Black teenagers," Paul said. "So, you know, 'why does Joe Biden hate Black teenagers' should be the question. Why does Joe Biden want to destroy all these jobs?"
55 years ago Milton Friedman wrote an article for Newsweek regarding the new minimum wage law passed by the economic illiterate congress:
Uncle Milty in 1966 said:Congress has just acted to increase unemployment. It did so by raising the legal minimum-wage rate from $1.25 to $1.60 an hour, effective in 1968, and extending its coverage. The result will be and must be to add to the ranks of the unemployed.
Does a merchant increase his sales by raising prices? Does higher pay of domestic servants induce more housewives to hire help? The situation is no different for other employers. The higher wage rate decreed by Congress for low-paid workers will raise the cost of the goods that these workers produce—and must discourage sales. It will also induce employers to replace such workers with other workers—either to do the same work or to produce machinery to do the same work or to produce machinery to do the work.
Some workers who already receive wages well above the legal minimum will benefit—because they will face less competition from the unskilled. That is why many unions are strong supporters of higher minimum-wage rates. Some employers and employees in places where wages are already high will benefit because they will face less competition from businessmen who might otherwise invest capital in areas that have large pools of unskilled labor. That is why Northern manufactures and unions, particularly in new England, are the principal sources of political pressure for higher legal minimum-wage rates.
...
The loss to the unskilled workers will not be offset by gains to others. Smaller total employment will result in a smaller total output. Hence the community as a whole will be worse off.
Women, teenagers, Negroes and particularly Negro teenagers, will be especially hard hit. I am convinced that the minimum-wage law is the most anti-Negro law on our statute books—in its effect not its intent. It is a tragic but undoubted legacy of the past—and one we must try to correct—that on the average Negroes have lower skills than whites. Similarly, teenagers are less skilled than older workers. Both Negroes and teenagers are only made worse off by discouraging employers from hiring them. On the-job training—the main route whereby the unskilled have become skilled—is thus denied them.
The shockingly high rate of unemployment among teenage Negro boys is largely a result of the present Federal minimum-wage rate. And unemployment will be boosted still higher by the rise just enacted. Before 1956, unemployment among Negro boys aged 14 to 19 was around 8 to 11%, about the same as among white boys. Within two years after the legal minimum was raised from 75 cents to $1 an hour in 1956, unemployment among Negro boys shot up to 24% and among white boys to 14%. Both figures have remained roughly the same ever since. But I am convinced that, when it becomes effective, the $1.60 minimum wage will increase unemployment among Negro boys to 30% or more.
Many well-meaning people favor legal minimum-wage rates in the mistaken belief that they help the poor. These people confuse wage rates with wage income. It has always been a mystery to me to understand why a youngster is better off unemployed at $1.60 an hour than employed at $1.25. The rise in the legal minimum-wage rate is a monument to the power of superficial thinking.
Remember, the biggest support for minimum wage laws come from the so-called "party of science", and of course, special interest groups. Jeff Bezos is a big supporter of a $15 minimum wage law. Gee, I wonder why.
And for those conservatives out there who dream of a "limited government", observe that the idiotic government can't even get something extremely simply like this right. If politicians are too stupid/evil to understand the effects of a price floor on wages, how do you expect them to accomplish something several orders of magnitude more difficult, like crafting just and efficient legal rules?