• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Media Problem in America Has Become a Threat

sKiTzo

DP Veteran
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
535
Location
OC California
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Other
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception, or just how grand the scale of it. (I realized how grand its effectiveness when I learned the truth about Libya and Gaddafi, who in reality was on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from a "ruthless dictator". He transformed Libya into a nearly utopian society. It was all lies. The whole fkn thing)

The circus will continue if people don't realize that (when you really look at everything going on)the MSM is probably the biggest problem in America today that we should be dealing with right now. The role of the media (in the whole scheme of things) is vital to the power seekers who control it. With a legit media, it would be more difficult for the power mongers to inch their way to tyranny. It would also put an end to all of the ridiculous and blatant false flags.

Apparently however, it's not illegal to falsify the news. This according to a federal judge's decision when those 2 reporters sued FOX for firing them because they refused to lie about the cancer implications involving the Monsanto bovine growth hormone. The first amendment gives them that protection. That may be true, but the 1st amendment does have limitations - like those, for example, that make false advertising illegal.

Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.
 
Last edited:
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception,

By who?

Who exactly is pulling this grand scheme to defraud the entire world? What entity is running the show?
 
the media has proved totally biased for the liberals and that is exactly how they make their money.... this then has the number 1 thing of america TOTALLY A FRAUD !!

some says the media gives 10 times more to liberal politicians others say 100 times more
 
By who?

Who exactly is pulling this grand scheme to defraud the entire world? What entity is running the show?

FOLLOW the money of how the media and entertainment gets their money and how they addict the lower IQ's who they get to vote and raise taxes on the producers to then go back to the low IQ's where then they are fooled and the money spent for the media and entertainment industry
 
FOLLOW the money of how the media and entertainment gets their money and how they addict the lower IQ's who they get to vote and raise taxes on the producers to then go back to the low IQ's where then they are fooled and the money spent for the media and entertainment industry

You probably don't see the irony in your use of "lower IQ" and your own comment here do you? :lamo
 
By who?

Who exactly is pulling this grand scheme to defraud the entire world? What entity is running the show?

I think it's pretty obvious that it is the lizard people
 
You probably don't see the irony in your use of "lower IQ" and your own comment here do you? :lamo


IQ is different than copying like a parrot which is memory intellect.... the logic part of the IQ is the most valuable which can find truth from false.... good from bad and value from non value..... ONLY a high logic test for voters can stop the harm of a bias media and entertainment industry
 
yep EXACTLY........


Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.
 
IQ is different than copying like a parrot which is memory intellect.... the logic part of the IQ is the most valuable which can find truth from false.... good from bad and value from non value..... ONLY a high logic test for voters can stop the harm of a bias media and entertainment industry

Can we get some test questions from the high logic test for voters that you are proposing?
 
The media is helping the spotlight stay away from the issues, and instead focus on Trump's inexperience.

I'll bet if journalists from Mexico were streaming over and undercutting their wages and taking their jobs, the media would be at Defcon 1!
 
By who?

Who exactly is pulling this grand scheme to defraud the entire world? What entity is running the show?

Well, according to this article the "Big Six" in the USA. Various others in foreign countries.

Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the amount of media outlets have increased. That translates to fewer companies owning more media outlets, increasing the concentration of ownership.[8] In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by fifty companies; today, 90% is controlled by just six companies. Comcast; The Walt Disney Company; News Corporation; Time Warner; Viacom CBS Corporation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership

Comcast would be Brian L. Roberts, Chairman, President, and CEO of Comcast, is son of co-founder Ralph Roberts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast

The Walt Disney Company would be the Sid Bass family and the Disney Family. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walt_Disney_Company

New Company would be Rupert Murdoch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corporation

Time Warner would be Jeff Bewkes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Warner

Viacom would be Sumner Murray Redstone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone

CBS Corporation would ALSO be Sumner Murray Redstone along with Leslie Roy Moonves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBS_Corporation

Does that help?
 
Well, according to this article the "Big Six" in the USA. Various others in foreign countries.

Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the amount of media outlets have increased. That translates to fewer companies owning more media outlets, increasing the concentration of ownership.[8] In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by fifty companies; today, 90% is controlled by just six companies. Comcast; The Walt Disney Company; News Corporation; Time Warner; Viacom CBS Corporation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership

Comcast would be Brian L. Roberts, Chairman, President, and CEO of Comcast, is son of co-founder Ralph Roberts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast

The Walt Disney Company would be the Sid Bass family and the Disney Family. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walt_Disney_Company

New Company would be Rupert Murdoch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Corporation

Time Warner would be Jeff Bewkes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Warner

Viacom would be Sumner Murray Redstone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone

CBS Corporation would ALSO be Sumner Murray Redstone along with Leslie Roy Moonves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBS_Corporation

Does that help?

Helps a little. Thanks.

So if we get our "news" from BBC, Al Jazeera, and Reuters we're all good then?
 
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception, or just how grand the scale of it. (I realized how grand its effectiveness when I learned the truth about Libya and Gaddafi, who in reality was on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from a "ruthless dictator". He transformed Libya into a nearly utopian society. It was all lies. The whole fkn thing)

The circus will continue if people don't realize that (when you really look at everything going on)the MSM is probably the biggest problem in America today that we should be dealing with right now. The role of the media (in the whole scheme of things) is vital to the power seekers who control it. With a legit media, it would be more difficult for the power mongers to inch their way to tyranny. It would also put an end to all of the ridiculous and blatant false flags.

Apparently however, it's not illegal to falsify the news. This according to a federal judge's decision when those 2 reporters sued FOX for firing them because they refused to lie about the cancer implications involving the Monsanto bovine growth hormone. The first amendment gives them that protection. That may be true, but the 1st amendment does have limitations - like those, for example, that make false advertising illegal.

Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.

Yeah......Gaddafi really was a ruthless dictator, so right off the bat your premise is falling apart......

And Libya was nowhere near an utopian society under him.
 
Can we get some test questions from the high logic test for voters that you are proposing?

It would be similar to the SAT math test.... but with out language and reading and memory intellect...... the ones who PREDICTS the best would be the high logics.... these are also natural prophets because of the high logic ability... this ability spots the ONE certain clue that proves something that is good or bad.. true or false .. value or non value..
 
Helps a little. Thanks.

So if we get our "news" from BBC, Al Jazeera, and Reuters we're all good then?

is reuters owned by a FOR PROFIT company??? if it is .. it is crooked for liberalism because that is how they get THEIR money

the media and the entertainment industry gets their money from the same system.... LIBERALISM..... this is a system that taxes the producers and brings the money to the addicted and brainwashed low IQ's and then the media and entertainment industry fools them and grabs that same money

and in long term the nation FALLS
 
is reuters owned by a FOR PROFIT company??? if it is .. it is crooked for liberalism because that is how they get THEIR money

the media and the entertainment industry gets their money from the same system.... LIBERALISM..... this is a system that taxes the producers and brings the money to the addicted and brainwashed low IQ's and then the media and entertainment industry fools them and grabs that same money

You still don't see the irony in your posts, and you using the "low IQ's" phrase do you?
 
You still don't see the irony in your posts, and you using the "low IQ's" phrase do you?

do you still not see the difference in copying like a parrot compared to understanding and inventing and predicting?? you still don't see the DIFFERENCE?

with a crooked media one can predict some things


PSST PSST PSST.. who RUNS OFF with a crooked media and a crooked govt?
 
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception, or just how grand the scale of it. (I realized how grand its effectiveness when I learned the truth about Libya and Gaddafi, who in reality was on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from a "ruthless dictator". He transformed Libya into a nearly utopian society. It was all lies. The whole fkn thing)

There's your problem: it wasn't 'nearly Utopian' in even the most cosmetic sense. Whether or not one agreed with getting rid of him, he committed wholesale abuses of human rights.

Factbox: Gaddafi rule marked by abuses, rights groups say | Reuters
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...nue-in-libya/2012/03/02/gIQApglynR_story.html
 
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception, or just how grand the scale of it. (I realized how grand its effectiveness when I learned the truth about Libya and Gaddafi, who in reality was on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from a "ruthless dictator". He transformed Libya into a nearly utopian society. It was all lies. The whole fkn thing)

The circus will continue if people don't realize that (when you really look at everything going on)the MSM is probably the biggest problem in America today that we should be dealing with right now. The role of the media (in the whole scheme of things) is vital to the power seekers who control it. With a legit media, it would be more difficult for the power mongers to inch their way to tyranny. It would also put an end to all of the ridiculous and blatant false flags.

Apparently however, it's not illegal to falsify the news. This according to a federal judge's decision when those 2 reporters sued FOX for firing them because they refused to lie about the cancer implications involving the Monsanto bovine growth hormone. The first amendment gives them that protection. That may be true, but the 1st amendment does have limitations - like those, for example, that make false advertising illegal.

Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.

Fox NEWS didnt fire them. I assume thats what youre implying. A local 21th century fox affiliate fired them (different company). And the news station never argued that they lied and had a constitutional right to do so. That was the accusers claim. The judge ruled that the accusers could not be protected under whistleblower status because they were not blowing the whistle on any violation of law, rule or regulation.

The entire dispute is based on an editorial difference of opinion and insubordinate employees.

Facebook post claims Fox 'admits they lie,' have right to 'distort news' | PunditFact
NEW WORLD COMMUNICATIONS OF TAMPA INC WTVT TV v. AKRE | FindLaw
 
I blame teh jooze
 
I think it's pretty obvious that it is the lizard people

Also obvious is that you don't seem to get how serious of a problem this is and how it's a threat to all of us. We are under FULL censorship and nobody realizes it. Covert censorship. Think about it for a minute - from the MSM you only get propaganda that the oligarchs are pushing and that's IT. You're not getting the truth about anything except maybe local stories. They put Hillary on a pedestal telling us how she's "winning" so much when in reality that couldn't be further from the truth. She and her DNC cronies stole the nomination in what could be considered the most blatantly executed election fraud in U.S. history.

Do you think the MSM didn't know about the cheating and that's why they failed to cover it? No, they didn't cover it because the MSM isn't here to inform you of the news. They exist solely to feed you propaganda that serves to create a desired climate. I just saw Putin (on alternative news, of course) in a news conference with all the foreign MSM saying we are on the brink of nuclear war and why aren't they telling the American people? Because we're censored. They tell us what they want to whether it be lies or whatever support of the latest false flag.
 
Yeah......Gaddafi really was a ruthless dictator, so right off the bat your premise is falling apart......

And Libya was nowhere near an utopian society under him.

...and you know this how...by listening to what the MSM told you? Am I correct? Because you won't find any evidence other than that. The truth is the exact opposite. That is what you'll find if you look into it.
 
Back
Top Bottom