- Joined
- May 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,671
- Reaction score
- 535
- Location
- OC California
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
I don't think enough people are aware of the extent to which the media is used as a tool of deception, or just how grand the scale of it. (I realized how grand its effectiveness when I learned the truth about Libya and Gaddafi, who in reality was on the complete opposite end of the spectrum from a "ruthless dictator". He transformed Libya into a nearly utopian society. It was all lies. The whole fkn thing)
The circus will continue if people don't realize that (when you really look at everything going on)the MSM is probably the biggest problem in America today that we should be dealing with right now. The role of the media (in the whole scheme of things) is vital to the power seekers who control it. With a legit media, it would be more difficult for the power mongers to inch their way to tyranny. It would also put an end to all of the ridiculous and blatant false flags.
Apparently however, it's not illegal to falsify the news. This according to a federal judge's decision when those 2 reporters sued FOX for firing them because they refused to lie about the cancer implications involving the Monsanto bovine growth hormone. The first amendment gives them that protection. That may be true, but the 1st amendment does have limitations - like those, for example, that make false advertising illegal.
Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.
The circus will continue if people don't realize that (when you really look at everything going on)the MSM is probably the biggest problem in America today that we should be dealing with right now. The role of the media (in the whole scheme of things) is vital to the power seekers who control it. With a legit media, it would be more difficult for the power mongers to inch their way to tyranny. It would also put an end to all of the ridiculous and blatant false flags.
Apparently however, it's not illegal to falsify the news. This according to a federal judge's decision when those 2 reporters sued FOX for firing them because they refused to lie about the cancer implications involving the Monsanto bovine growth hormone. The first amendment gives them that protection. That may be true, but the 1st amendment does have limitations - like those, for example, that make false advertising illegal.
Fraud is illegal. If they are billing themselves as a news agency claiming to deliver real information about true events (which they definitely do)), then falsifying news is an act of fraud. Also, the 1st amendment goes out the window if damages are involved. There are damages involved. Their willful acts of deceiving the public is helping to destroy the country.
Last edited: