• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Media’s Shameful Hunter Biden Abdication

Status
Not open for further replies.
That was intentional. It shows that the story in the OP most definitely has not been "spiked" by the mainstream media. I added one that predates the election to show that the politically motivated Hunter Biden email narrative also was not spiked before the election. The media is protecting no one and nothing but their bottom line. Actual scandals will always get more media attention than nonexistent scandals manufactured by a party for political gain.


The Repair Shop owner repeatedly tried to return the computer to Hunter AND TO GET PAID FOR THE REPAIRS PERFORMED, but was not successful on either count.

In Mid September, 2020, he tried to turn the computer over to the FBI but was told to go away.

The material in this is incendiary and was spiked to prevent it from being made public.

Notable about the lack of coverage from the major media sources of the legacy media is that their coverage is primarily to explain why they did not cover it.

NBC noted that covering this would have impacted the political campaign. Omigod! Ya think?
 
Even if Hunter Biden's emails ultimately turn out to be a non-issue, what is unquestionably an issue and worthy of discussion is much of the media's abject bias in its attempts to make it a non-story from the very beginning. This, quite simply, is not what a free press is meant to do, and the National Review is spot on with this editorial.


LOL
 
This is the part they don't understand, or are unwilling to acknowledge. If the tables were turned, they would be screaming about nazi dictators.

But I'm beginning to believe they will support nazi dictators as long as they themselves remain the favored political class.

Beginning to believe?
 
The Repair Shop owner repeatedly tried to return the computer to Hunter AND TO GET PAID FOR THE REPAIRS PERFORMED, but was not successful on either count.

In Mid September, 2020, he tried to turn the computer over to the FBI but was told to go away.

The material in this is incendiary and was spiked to prevent it from being made public.

Notable about the lack of coverage from the major media sources of the legacy media is that their coverage is primarily to explain why they did not cover it.

NBC noted that covering this would have impacted the political campaign. Omigod! Ya think?

I have already proven this is false. See my above post with sources. The story was never spiked. There was never any lack of media coverage. You only think there wasn't enough media coverage, because you wanted this to be a bigger story than it was in order to harm Joe Biden's election chances. Having embarrassing pictures of yourself on a laptop is not incendiary, it is normal American behavior.
 
Even if Hunter Biden's emails ultimately turn out to be a non-issue, what is unquestionably an issue and worthy of discussion is much of the media's abject bias in its attempts to make it a non-story from the very beginning. This, quite simply, is not what a free press is meant to do, and the National Review is spot on with this editorial.


Why should the media pretend its an issue when its not an issue?
 
Until there is some official information like a charge or case closed, beats the hell out of me what there is to report short of speculation and rumour.
 
Why should the media pretend its an issue when its not an issue?
The strong likelihood that the now President of the United States sold influence while Vice President of the United States not an issue? Posts don’t get more obtuse than that.
 
Even if Hunter Biden's emails ultimately turn out to be a non-issue, what is unquestionably an issue and worthy of discussion is much of the media's abject bias in its attempts to make it a non-story from the very beginning. This, quite simply, is not what a free press is meant to do, and the National Review is spot on with this editorial.


The controversy should not even be relatable to the topic of the events that occurred.

The fact that the story was spiked by news reporting outlets is the issue and the issue exists because of the bias displayed the propagandistic butt holes in our media.
 
I have already proven this is false. See my above post with sources. The story was never spiked. There was never any lack of media coverage. You only think there wasn't enough media coverage, because you wanted this to be a bigger story than it was in order to harm Joe Biden's election chances. Having embarrassing pictures of yourself on a laptop is not incendiary, it is normal American behavior.

Trump's son has a meeting that was poorly considered and ended because it was a swindle executed upon him by agents of the Democrat Party.

This was covered and covered and covered again.

Can you imagine what would have happened if there ware pictures of him in various stages of undress, unconscious with a crack pipe hanging out of this mouth?

You can delude yourself that the coverage of the two parties is equitable, but any sane person understands that the deck is stacked and the game is rigged.

There apparently is no Wiki article on the hunter Lap Top yet. Perhaps the pictures were deemed to be too obscene to publish.

 
This is the part they don't understand, or are unwilling to acknowledge. If the tables were turned, they would be screaming about nazi dictators.

But I'm beginning to believe they will support nazi dictators as long as they themselves remain the favored political class.
But they will never realize they're supporting Nazi, Communist or Fascist dictators. Just as in the past they really do believe that lies, censorship and overall propaganda is for the public good over the long term, but never examine the possible long term consequences of their ideas too closely. The outcome is always the same but each time these ideologists seeking out a new 'system' believe confidently that this time it will be different.

They feel people can be easily managed for their own good and they're just the people to carry out this management, if only they're just listen.
 
But they will never realize they're supporting Nazi, Communist or Fascist dictators. Just as in the past they really do believe that lies, censorship and overall propaganda is for the public good over the long term, but never examine the possible long term consequences of their ideas too closely. The outcome is always the same but each time these ideologists seeking out a new 'system' believe confidently that this time it will be different.

They feel people can be easily managed for their own good and they're just the people to carry out this management, if only they're just listen.

Socialism, Communism and Naziism all require that an all-powerful Central Authority be in place to quash opposition as it occurs.

They have found that Emergency Powers for a health Crisis works okay so suddenly Gun Control and Racism are Health Crises.

You thought the last lock downs were repressive? Stay tuned. You ain't seen nothing yet.

The next masks will go over our eyes. Our mouths are reserved for the gags.
 
Even if Hunter Biden's emails ultimately turn out to be a non-issue, what is unquestionably an issue and worthy of discussion is much of the media's abject bias in its attempts to make it a non-story from the very beginning. This, quite simply, is not what a free press is meant to do, and the National Review is spot on with this editorial.


They are a non issue.
 
Trump's son has a meeting that was poorly considered and ended because it was a swindle executed upon him by agents of the Democrat Party.

This was covered and covered and covered again.

Can you imagine what would have happened if there ware pictures of him in various stages of undress, unconscious with a crack pipe hanging out of this mouth?

You can delude yourself that the coverage of the two parties is equitable, but any sane person understands that the deck is stacked and the game is rigged.

There apparently is no Wiki article on the hunter Lap Top yet. Perhaps the pictures were deemed to be too obscene to publish.


You are comparing apples and oranges. The Trump tower meeting with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin connections actually happened. Combined with Trump's obsequiousness towards Vladimir Putin and Russia's interference in Trump's favor in the 2016 and 2020 elections, that's a big story. Plus, Biden does not appear to be irrationally afraid of Putin, therefore even if Hunter Biden had been the one who met with a Russian lawyer, it would have been less of a story than when Trump's son and members of his inner circle did. Biden is not suspected of coordinating with Russia to steal an election, nor is he suspected of being vulnerable to blackmail when it comes to his dealings with Russia. Trump is.
 
Last edited:
I have already proven this is false. See my above post with sources. The story was never spiked.

No, it was towed out to sea and buried with the USS Johnston
 
Debunked.
My ass. No one in the MSM touched this story for more than a millisecond. Now they are trying to rehabilitate him, like his drug addiction, whores, fathering illegitimate kids, Burisma, China ... never happened . It's shameful, shameful shameful.
 
I don't have time to catch up with recent comments right now but l will later today. But, my gosh, the recent news and pictures from that Hunter laptop are mind blowing!
 
Conversation in Fox boardroom...."what are we going to do about Gaetz"..........."I know Hunter Biden"
 
They are a non issue.

If that is true, then why was the story spiked?

Why did Twitter and Facebook conspire to kill the story and assure that no mention of it leaked out?

 
You are comparing apples and oranges. The Trump tower meeting with a Russian lawyer with Kremlin connections actually happened. Combined with Trump's obsequiousness towards Vladimir Putin and Russia's interference in Trump's favor in the 2016 and 2020 elections, that's a big story. Plus, Biden does not appear to be irrationally afraid of Putin, therefore even if Hunter Biden had been the one who met with a Russian lawyer, it would have been less of a story than when Trump's son and members of his inner circle did. Biden is not suspected of coordinating with Russia to steal an election, nor is he suspected of being vulnerable to blackmail when it comes to his dealings with Russia. Trump is.

You seem to not understand who's afraid of whom.

Putin froze construction of the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline running from Russia to Germany due to Trump's strong opposition to it. Putin feared Trump. Not the other way around.

The guy that was hiding under his bed wetting his pants (right next to Obama doing the same every time Putin's name was mentioned between 2008 and 2016) is Biden. That policy "position" has, apparently, been re-assumed.

Trump loses the election and the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline is re-started by Putin as Putin assumes that Biden will again hide under his bed and wet his pants every time he thinks of Putin.

This project was halted due to the accumulated respect and fear by the Euros and the Russians of the US under Trump leadership. With Biden in charge? Who cares.

Biden stops construction of the Keystone XL pipeline and allows the resumption of the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline. What's wrong with this picture?

 
If that is true, then why was the story spiked?

Why did Twitter and Facebook conspire to kill the story and assure that no mention of it leaked out?


No one "spiked" the story or "kill" it. The headline of the article you linked contains the very reason those and other media platforms behaved as they did with the Hunter Biden "New York Post's disputed" story.

There you have it.
 
You seem to not understand who's afraid of whom.

Putin froze construction of the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline running from Russia to Germany due to Trump's strong opposition to it. Putin feared Trump. Not the other way around.

The guy that was hiding under his bed wetting his pants (right next to Obama doing the same every time Putin's name was mentioned between 2008 and 2016) is Biden. That policy "position" has, apparently, been re-assumed.

Trump loses the election and the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline is re-started by Putin as Putin assumes that Biden will again hide under his bed and wet his pants every time he thinks of Putin.

This project was halted due to the accumulated respect and fear by the Euros and the Russians of the US under Trump leadership. With Biden in charge? Who cares.

Biden stops construction of the Keystone XL pipeline and allows the resumption of the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline. What's wrong with this picture?


So... Putin interfered in the election to help Trump in 2016 AND 2020 because Putin was afraid of him and wanted Biden to win? Does that scan to you?

https://apnews.com/article/joe-bide...putin-russia-fa31892c65992083a43ff44b1216af32
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom