What is that? Democrats may think the brand is all about diversity, inclusion and fairness. But for millions of Americans, the brand is also about contempt — intellectual contempt of the kind Nimzowitsch exuded for his opponent ["to this idiot I have to lose?"] moral contempt of the sort Hillary Clinton felt for Trump (never more evident than last year when Hillary Clinton wondered, “Why aren’t I fifty points ahead?”).
That seems to have been what happened in the Sixth District the moment Democrats decided to turn the race into a referendum on Trump. “Republicans saw Ossoff’s campaign omnipresence as a political siege and call for resistance,” notes Billy Michael Honor, a Presbyterian minister and resident of the district and self-described progressive, in an astute column at The Huffington Post. “The end result being the Republican base outperforming an energized Democratic Party voter turnout campaign.”
Whatever their misgivings about Trump, those Republicans weren’t about to give Nancy Pelosi the satisfaction of a national victory. Contemporary liberalism now expresses itself chiefly in the language of self-affirmation and moral censure: of being the party of the higher-minded; of affixing the suffix “phobe” to millions of people who don’t appreciate being described as bigots.
It’s intolerable....
In the New York Times, of all places:
In the Georgia 6th District Democrats did not lose because of lack of turnout or lack of money or lack of energy or lack of pandering. They lost because of their brand.
And Democrats are not going to be able to change this dynamic, because their contempt for their political opponents is integral to their own self image, their own sense of self worth and superiority. Asking them to drop this is like asking them to saw off their legs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...-ossoff-politics-of-contempt.html?nytmobile=0
Lulz. "Contempt for their political opponents"?
You mean like how Ossoff's opponent ran ads claiming he supported shooting Republicans?
Or like how Eric Trump doesn't even consider Democrats human?
Like that?
In the New York Times, of all places:
In the Georgia 6th District Democrats did not lose because of lack of turnout or lack of money or lack of energy or lack of pandering. They lost because of their brand.
And Democrats are not going to be able to change this dynamic, because their contempt for their political opponents is integral to their own self image, their own sense of self worth and superiority. Asking them to drop this is like asking them to saw off their legs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...-ossoff-politics-of-contempt.html?nytmobile=0
no, that's different.
In the New York Times, of all places:
In the Georgia 6th District Democrats did not lose because of lack of turnout or lack of money or lack of energy or lack of pandering. They lost because of their brand.
And Democrats are not going to be able to change this dynamic, because their contempt for their political opponents is integral to their own self image, their own sense of self worth and superiority. Asking them to drop this is like asking them to saw off their legs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...-ossoff-politics-of-contempt.html?nytmobile=0
In the New York Times, of all places:
In the Georgia 6th District Democrats did not lose because of lack of turnout or lack of money or lack of energy or lack of pandering. They lost because of their brand.
And Democrats are not going to be able to change this dynamic, because their contempt for their political opponents is integral to their own self image, their own sense of self worth and superiority. Asking them to drop this is like asking them to saw off their legs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...-ossoff-politics-of-contempt.html?nytmobile=0
Lulz. "Contempt for their political opponents"?
You mean like how Ossoff's opponent ran ads claiming he supported shooting Republicans?
Or like how Eric Trump doesn't even consider Democrats human?
Like that?
More like mischaracterizing people and putting words in their mouths and intentions that they didn't say or mean and plucking one word or phrase out of a whole thought and context and holding it up as the total of what the person expressed.
Ah. Perhaps he meant like this?
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House | HuffPost
The pastor makes a significant point. Those of us who voted for or support President Trump not because he is not a flawed person, because he is, but because he has an agenda we can support. We believe he genuinely wants to accomplish that agenda. And the way to win our hearts and minds is via a better agenda and not by telling us that we are horrible people. Hillary's now famous 'deplorable speech' sums up how Democrats campaign these days: "You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?" Clinton said. "The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."
That was a flat out lie, both about Trump supporters in general and about Trump himself. And intellectually honest people know it.
I think the whole politics of personal destruction mantra is finally at long last starting to turn good people off no matter what their political leanings, most especially when that is all they have. The Democrats are losing because all they have to offer is ugly or hateful comments about people with no agenda, vision, solutions, hope to back it up.
Yes the Republicans also deal in negativity on the campaign and take advantage where they see it. But at least some of them, including President Trump who isn't really a Republican but is stuck with that brand, also offers a vision, a hope, concrete ideas about what needs to be done.
Ah. Perhaps he meant like this?
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House | HuffPost
He didn't call for killing Hillary. After he recited what he considered illegal acts of Hillary re Benghazi and her e-mails he quipped that she should be put on the firing line and shot for treason. Not that much different from anybody quipping "he should be hung" for doing that.
You'll find that one line amidst a lengthy interview in which he had a LOT to say about many different things. You'll find his comments on Hillary beginning at about 8 minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7k0hka548w
The Secret Service investigated and found no threat there. I wonder if they investigate all the Democrats calling for violence including the death of President Trump?
More like mischaracterizing people and putting words in their mouths and intentions that they didn't say or mean and plucking one word or phrase out of a whole thought and context and holding it up as the total of what the person expressed.
30 percent of the people who voted for Trump are Trump supporters and actually believe in sentence in bold....The other 70 percent didn't vote for Trump, they voted against Hilliary....
They said exactly those things. Nothing was taken out of context.
Your rationalizations are really getting threadbare.
So, IOW, he called for killing Hillary. You could have saved yourself the trouble of writing so much in a laughable rationalization.
Ah. Perhaps he meant like this?
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House
Trump Adviser Who Called For Killing Hillary Clinton Gets Front-Row Seat At White House | HuffPost
I'm sure you believe that. Which is why Democrats will continue (I hope) to lose.
Do you really think you score points when you push something so intellectually dishonest?
our two party system has been utter in-group / out-group hyperpartisan hatred for decades. where this issue is concerned, neither side has enough moral high ground to build a ****house on.
No, he was calling for Hillary's lawful execution.
I agree that Hillary should have been prosecuted, but I'm against capital punishment in general.
He called for the killing of Hillary. Full stop. Do not pass go. It's on the record.
Do you think you're winning any arguments with such brazen intellectual cowardice?
Well keep it up my friend. The Democrats are losing ground day by day with this kind of intellectual dishonesty that the intellectually honest on both sides are rejecting. And the way I see it, that is a good thing. Have a pleasant day.
:lamoIn the New York Times, of all places:
In the Georgia 6th District Democrats did not lose because of lack of turnout or lack of money or lack of energy or lack of pandering. They lost because of their brand.
And Democrats are not going to be able to change this dynamic, because their contempt for their political opponents is integral to their own self image, their own sense of self worth and superiority. Asking them to drop this is like asking them to saw off their legs.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/22/...-ossoff-politics-of-contempt.html?nytmobile=0
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?