• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The London bombers were set up:(

God you are an ignorant fool..
 
"Seven months before the invasion of Iraq, the head of British foreign intelligence reported to Prime Minister Tony Blair that President Bush wanted to topple Saddam Hussein by military action and warned that in Washington intelligence was "being fixed around the policy," according to notes of a July 23, 2002, meeting with Blair at No. 10 Downing Street."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201857.html
 
Christopher Brooks said:
How many qualified sources do you think makes a case ghost.
Click to expand...

You have not made any case. Insted you have just made allot of people mad. I think that if you wish to bring this case back in afew days you should. But please, and i do mean please. Study your facts, do not make assumtions on the media. The media is there only to start trouble. They no longer protect anything. And as far as Im concerned you are a coward who hides behind facts by other people. Not your own opinion. Sure it is fine to see what is going on. But to formulate your own ideas is much better.
 
ghost, the reason "people" get "mad" is because I expose the
truth in the referenced articles which bring forth a large range of
qualified, referenced opinion.

This is called research. It dispels ignorance and a narrow mind.
 
No. This is called flood the red necks with as many links as possible and play it off as fact.

More than half of your links are from bias sites that associate themselves as socialists or devoted anti-war propagandists. Others are opinionated sites which are laughable and the rest are news stories that have come and gone like thousands of others.

Nothing was fact. It was all opinion, and rumors. You’ve failed.
 
Now back to the topic of this thread.

Could this Jewish musician know what he is talking about?


Gilad Atzmon's Complete Message
London is under attack once again. Though on the surface it doesn't look like a catastrophic event the message is clear: we are very vulnerable. And yet, we seem to be very slow to learn our lesson. Although there are some indications that the majority of British public is seriously associating Blair's policies with the deterioration of their day-to-day security situation, until now, no substantial political call to oust Blair has been made.

Blair is still running this country and as it is apparent, we are aiming towards a colossal disaster. Some hours ago an Asian man was shot five times down in the Tube by "plainclothes police officers". We are moving rapidly towards a fragmented and segregated society in which Asian looking people seem to be under constant threat. In every speech Blair preaches at us to stop the evil ideology. Let me be clear about it, putting bombs in the tube is no doubt evil, but what is the ideology behind it? We are yet to learn who stands behind the different London bombings. Thus, we can't associate the different events with any ideology. If to be honest, the only clear and unmistakeable evil ideology I can think of is the one practiced by Mr. Blair himself. Wasn't it Blair who voluntarily joined forces with Mr. Bush, starting a war without UN approval? It is Blair and Bush the ones who turning our planet into a ticking bomb.

Things are getting complicated here in the UK. The British public is very confused. So far, the outcome of the investigation of the previous attack makes it undoubtedly clear that the four young Muslims suspected to be the perpetrators were anything but suicide bombers. According to the Sunday papers, on the day of the attack the suspected kamikazes put valid parking tickets on their car's window screens. They then bought a return ticket form Luton to London.

Down in the tube, they bought return tickets again. It doesn't take a genius to realise that suicide bombers do not look to save money on their "way back." The police argues that they carried their explosives in rucksacks. This is very unusual indeed. In Palestine and Iraq kamikazes strap their explosives to their bodies. Anyhow, the police are talking about the bombers carrying just five kilograms of explosives each. Again it doesn't make much sense. People who want to kill do not save on explosives. They simply take as much as they can. The only explanation I can think of is that the young fellows more than likely didn't have a clue. They didn't know what they were carrying in their bags. They didn't know what they were up to.

The four young fellows were not kamikazes. They were either decoys or more likely victims of a third murderous party with a clear vicious agenda. As it seems, they were blindly pooled into an act without really realising what they were involved in. Beyond doubt, none of them was the leader of the attack. A leader could carry far more explosives just to cause more carnage. Another fact to bear in mind is that the suspected terrorists didn't leave any message behind. As we know, in Palestine kamikazes leave some sort of a farewell statement: a video, a letter, or even some lines of religious texts. Those using the tactic of the suicide bomb think of themselves in terms of martyrdom. So far, nothing as such has been found in the UK.

The conclusion we can draw is clear. The real perpetrators of the underground bombing are still free, they are out there and they may attack again, but then who could they be?

It is very difficult to determine. Blair is trying to tell us that they must be Muslim fundamentalists, but in fact they can as well be just Arab nationalists. Thinking about it, isn't it fathomable that they could be far right British nationalists? The BNP was the first to say "didn't we warn you all about those Muslims?" But it goes further, as many informal commentators mentioned, we shouldn't exclude the possibility that some foreign intelligence services may be involved. Both Mossad and CIA are reasonable candidates. In the course of the years, Mossad made itself some serious reputation for its "false flag" operations. Why would the Mossad be interested in such a kill? Just because Zionism benefits from the emergence of the alleged "cultural clash" between the so-called "Judeo Christian" world and the Muslim one. The CIA, another "false flag" operator could be easily linked to the events of the bombing. Such an attacks would fuel the "War Against Terror" with some new destructive zeal.

Seemingly, the list of potential perpetrators is open, clearly we know very little, but as a matter of fact we know nothing. We are just guessing here. Moreover, it is likely that we will never know the truth. However, one thing is clear. We all suspect the official government account. We do not trust our elected politicians. We know that Blair lied to us before and during the war, we know that all the official commissions of enquiries were nothing more than to provide a service of whitewashing. Clearly, we become more and more cynical about this concept of liberal democracy.

However, people here do understand that it is Blair's policy that makes them so vulnerable. Blair is telling us that we have to fight the evil ideology. He pleads for us not to surrender to terror. He is right, we should never surrender to Anglo-American state terrorism. We must stop the current wave of Western colonialism. We must oust Blair and the sooner the better. Can we do it? Not really, it is down to the Labour Party to kick out their warmonger leader.
 
Tetracide said:
No. This is called flood the red necks with as many links as possible and play it off as fact.

More than half of your links are from bias sites that associate themselves as socialists or devoted anti-war propagandists. Others are opinionated sites which are laughable and the rest are news stories that have come and gone like thousands of others.

Nothing was fact. It was all opinion, and rumors. You’ve failed.
Click to expand...

Tetracide, I am happy to rest my case.
I guess you are just better informed
than me and all the qualified, referenced
opinion I presented.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom