• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The liberal assult on America, Obama and Clinton

blaxshep

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 22, 2012
Messages
16,875
Reaction score
7,666
Location
St. Petersburg
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are exploiting the killing of five police officers in Dallas to push a range of assaults on the U.S. Constitution, including a decades-old plot to federalize America's local police departments without any semblance of constitutional authority. In between subtly demonizing law-enforcement officers as racists and touting the controversial Black Lives Matter movement, the two Democrat Party standard-bearers also seized on the Dallas police shootings to promote further infringements on the constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. Critics, though, including among America's police forces, blasted the Obama administration and its allies for fueling a “war” on law enforcement.

The establishment plan to federalize and militarize America's state and local police forces has been underway for decades. In recent years, though, the Obama administration has pushed the agenda further and faster than ever. Among other schemes, the White House has used “executive actions,” as well as bribe money provided by Congress and threats of lawsuits, to impose a wide range of unconstitutional federal “guidelines” and controls on law enforcement. Some critics referred to the schemes as “Common Core for police,” a reference to the administration's abuse of federal bribes to impose dumbed-down national “standards” on America's local school systems. The United Nations has even called on American police to obey what UN boss Ban Ki-moon called “international standards.”

Under the U.S. Constitution, though, police powers were not delegated to the federal government. That means those powers are reserved to the states, communities, or the people, as made explicit in the 10th Amendment. As such, American law-enforcement functions have generally been the responsibility of state, county, and local government, hence the close to 18,000 state and local law-enforcement agencies across America. Under the American federalist system of self-government, those police forces have traditionally been funded and controlled by the local communities they are supposed to protect and serve, making them accountable to the elected leaders of those communities rather than Obama. This system has served as a powerful check against centralized power, making any bid for full-blown national tyranny extremely difficult to impose.

The UN, meanwhile, known to critics as the “dictators club,” has made a similar push to centralize American law enforcement. From constantly demonizing local American police forces as trigger-happy racists to urging the federal government to trample on the Constitution and usurp control over law enforcement, the UN has become increasingly bold in recent years. After the killing of Dallas officers, the UN released a press release blasting an alleged “high level of structural and institutional racism” among American peace officers. The bizarre screed also called on the U.S. government to promote “Black lives matter,” a term associated with a UN-linked racist movement that even leading black American police chiefs have blasted as a “radical hate group.”

Obama and Hillary Exploit Murdered Cops to Federalize Police
 
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are exploiting the killing of five police officers in Dallas to push a range of assaults on the U.S. Constitution, including a decades-old plot to federalize America's local police departments without any semblance of constitutional authority. In between subtly demonizing law-enforcement officers as racists and touting the controversial Black Lives Matter movement, the two Democrat Party standard-bearers also seized on the Dallas police shootings to promote further infringements on the constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms. Critics, though, including among America's police forces, blasted the Obama administration and its allies for fueling a “war” on law enforcement.

The establishment plan to federalize and militarize America's state and local police forces has been underway for decades. In recent years, though, the Obama administration has pushed the agenda further and faster than ever. Among other schemes, the White House has used “executive actions,” as well as bribe money provided by Congress and threats of lawsuits, to impose a wide range of unconstitutional federal “guidelines” and controls on law enforcement. Some critics referred to the schemes as “Common Core for police,” a reference to the administration's abuse of federal bribes to impose dumbed-down national “standards” on America's local school systems. The United Nations has even called on American police to obey what UN boss Ban Ki-moon called “international standards.”

Under the U.S. Constitution, though, police powers were not delegated to the federal government. That means those powers are reserved to the states, communities, or the people, as made explicit in the 10th Amendment. As such, American law-enforcement functions have generally been the responsibility of state, county, and local government, hence the close to 18,000 state and local law-enforcement agencies across America. Under the American federalist system of self-government, those police forces have traditionally been funded and controlled by the local communities they are supposed to protect and serve, making them accountable to the elected leaders of those communities rather than Obama. This system has served as a powerful check against centralized power, making any bid for full-blown national tyranny extremely difficult to impose.

The UN, meanwhile, known to critics as the “dictators club,” has made a similar push to centralize American law enforcement. From constantly demonizing local American police forces as trigger-happy racists to urging the federal government to trample on the Constitution and usurp control over law enforcement, the UN has become increasingly bold in recent years. After the killing of Dallas officers, the UN released a press release blasting an alleged “high level of structural and institutional racism” among American peace officers. The bizarre screed also called on the U.S. government to promote “Black lives matter,” a term associated with a UN-linked racist movement that even leading black American police chiefs have blasted as a “radical hate group.”

Obama and Hillary Exploit Murdered Cops to Federalize Police

It's time to give up. As bad as she is, Trump is no alternative.
 
Establishment militarization of the police!

But BLM is the problem for criticizing cops.
 
Establishment militarization of the police!

But BLM is the problem for criticizing cops.

Two different issues. BLM are Thug advocates. The militarization of the police is a liberal agenda.

The only thing common is the liberals are using the racial hatred they fostered to justify their agenda.
 
Two different issues. BLM are Thug advocates. The militarization of the police is a liberal agenda.

The only thing common is the liberals are using the racial hatred they fostered to justify their agenda.


Hahahahahah.

Oh god this post is wrong in so many ways.
 
Please explain.

Liberals are the ones protesting militarized police, not advocating it.

And the issues are definitely not separate.
 
Hahahahahah.

Oh god this post is wrong in so many ways.

Well lets see, Obama says whites are inherently racist, fostering the hatred, Hillary supports BLM who's radicals kill police with guns.

Of course when there are mass murders now we need gun control and since there is systemic racism within local and state police means we need federalization of the police.

Its pretty obvious.
 
Well lets see, Obama says whites are inherently racist, fostering the hatred, Hillary supports BLM who's radicals kill police with guns.

Of course when there are mass murders now we need gun control and since there is systemic racism within local and state police means we need federalization of the police.

Its pretty obvious.

Obama says whites are inherently racist.

Man, why haven't you linked that video a hundred times? That's gold!
 
Liberals are the ones protesting militarized police, not advocating it.

I've never seen a 2nd amendment hating Liberal that wanted the police to be without guns.
 
Establishment militarization of the police!

But BLM is the problem for criticizing cops.

The 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (signed by Bill Clinton) provided additional funding for local police agencies, imposed stronger sentences for gun, gang and drug crime, strengthened the ability to address crimes against women and opened more prisons. It can be argued, quite effectively, that these moves are the primary reason for the decline in crime overall and violent crime in particular during the last 20 years. Yet the same people who hailed this law as a great success 20 years ago are now opposing nearly every facet of it. The only part of that bill they aren't opposing happens to be the only part that didn't work and that is the assault weapons ban.
 
Liberals are the ones protesting militarized police, not advocating it.

And the issues are definitely not separate.

Black Lives Matter are the ones protesting miltarized police. Liberals are now showing solidarity with the thugs. All built on "Hands Up, Don't shoot" lies. Civilized people can not respect obvious distortion.
 
I've never seen a 2nd amendment hating Liberal that wanted the police to be without guns.

Theres that absolute extrapolation thing.

"Has guns" and "militarized." Same thing to you, I guess.
 
Back
Top Bottom