• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Left’s War on America Explained. Mashmont Gets to the Nub of It.

Sorry I stopped reading after america's top journalist rush limbaugh. For me that shot any credibility of what was to follow.

Rush Limbaugh america's top journalist, what a hoot.

Tell me the journalist today who surpasses Rush in any metric; salary, audience size, influence. Who's your pick? Freaking Frodo?
 
Anyhow, since Rush isn't the thesis of my OP, let me bolster my case by giving proof that the left is insincere about their stated causes:

1. Rape/molestation of women: Justin Fairfax, Virginia Secretary of state: two women credibly accused him of rape. Both are Democrats. Result? Democrat Party didn't ask him to resign. Still in office
Bill Clinton. sexual involvment with a subordinate. Silence from NOW. Stayed in office

2. The Environment. No bigger polluter than China. Silence from the leftist environmentalist nuts. Hollywood actors' private jets; Silence from the leftwing nuts

3. Immigration Reform; Democrats talked about wanting it forever. 0bummer caged children. Silence from the hypocritical left.

4. Racism: Militant blacks can say whatever they want. Even use the N word. Silence from the hypocritical left.

5. Slavery. Prevalent in Africa. Left silent about it.


You see, people, if the left were sincere about any one of these issues, they would be concerned no matter who is doing it. They are total hypocrites. This is the opposite with religious conservatives. We oppose abortion regardless of who is doing it, because we are sincere about the issue.
 
Sorry I stopped reading after america's top journalist rush limbaugh. For me that shot any credibility of what was to follow.

Rush Limbaugh america's top journalist, what a hoot.

He is not very well known here, I thought that he was a radio talk show host and not a journalist.
 
Lie number one.


What was really said and done was:



Welfare: As if being "food stamp president" weren't enough, Barack Obama's administration is partnering with the Mexican government to make sure Mexican nationals living in the U.S. don't miss out. Ay caramba!

Access to this page has been denied.

As you have seen Rush the pill lush is always lying because the fat bastard is a liar, period and Mashedmouth falls head over heels in gay love for the fat pill head...
 
He is not very well known here, I thought that he was a radio talk show host and not a journalist.

He is and he is nothing comparable to anyone with an ounce of respect or dedication to telling the truth....
 
Journalist n. one who gathers and or disseminates news. Elrushbo disseminates news. Ergo he is a journalist.
Even by your loose definition of journalism, Limbaugh is no journalist. He gathers information, pulls out any facts that he doesn’t like, mixes in a bunch far right wing propaganda and flat out lies, and spews it out to his horde of likeminded idiots.

Now, name another journalist who surpasses Rush in any metric: salary, audience size, influence, prescience. Rush OWNS all four. Nobody comes close.
Another false argument. Limbaugh panders to a specific minority demographic of right wing idiots. The vast majority of Americans listen to and/or watch other actual journalists.
 

Nope. He opines on the news items he chooses. I could tell you about an accident I saw, or I could tell you my opinion about it; they're not the same thing.
 

Leftism is a cult.
 

Haha thats hysterical
America’s top journalist Rush Limbaugh
 
Nope. He opines on the news items he chooses. I could tell you about an accident I saw, or I could tell you my opinion about it; they're not the same thing.

Tell me how this is different from any other journalist on any of the mainstream networks/
 
Even Rush doesn't call himself a journalist, so theres that I suppose.

Actually, Rush has called himself a journalist and a historian, and he is probably the best in the world at both.
 
Tell me how this is different from any other journalist on any of the mainstream networks/

That creates a bit of a dilemma then, doesn't it?

If he is no different than any of the other journalists, then what the hell is he complaining about them for when he is doing the same ****?

Or

He's not actually a journalist, as he has proclaimed many times, and the statement of him being a top journalist is just something stupid you made up/

Kinda one or the other.
 

I quit reading as soon as I saw "America's top journalist Rush Limbaugh".

Do you really expect anyone other than your fellow Trump cultists to take you seriously when you write such nonsense?

This is the real problem...you Repugs hate Democrats and liberals so much that you ignore much bigger problems, such as the corrupt racist traitor Donald J. Trump.
 
Even by your loose definition of journalism, Limbaugh is no journalist. He gathers information, pulls out any facts that he doesn’t like,
Which journalist DOESN'T edit the news? Which journalist is unbiased?

Another false argument. Limbaugh panders to a specific minority demographic of right wing idiots. The vast majority of Americans listen to and/or watch other actual journalists.

Which 'other' journalist doesn't pander to a specific minority demographic? Who are the actual journalists? How are they more actual journalists than Rush Limbaugh?
 
Actually, Rush has called himself a journalist and a historian, and he is probably the best in the world at both.

Wrong.

What he HAS said regarding that particular word is that he is doing the job that journalists won't or don't want to do. He has made it quite clear for years that he doesn't consider himself a journalist.

As for being a historian......that is laughable at best.
 

I should have said "How is Rush less of a journalist than any of the so-called journalists. He does what they do, only he's ten times better at it.
 

Do you listen to Rush every day? I do. I know for a fact he has said he is both a journalist and a historian and the most successful at both. He's 100% right. Notice neither you nor anybody else can point to a more successful journalist today by any measure than Rush Limbaugh. That's speaks volumes.
 
I should have said "How is Rush less of a journalist than any of the so-called journalists. He does what they do, only he's ten times better at it.

My question still stands, especially the first part, given your response.
 
My question still stands, especially the first part, given your response.

Does an intelligent person keep asking the same question after being given the answer?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…