The Left’s Knee-Jerk Compulsion Toward’s Treason (1 Viewer)

[aquapub]

The New York Times and Los Angeles Times have blown the cover of another successful anti-terror operation despite being asked by the federal government, again, not to do so in the interest of national security. Using the same constitutionally illiterate hysteria about privacy that they used in their last triumph over national security, they have decided foreign terror suspects now also have a right to privacy when it comes to the funds they use to conduct their attacks.

There is no legally acknowledged expectation of privacy when you send money to a bank and have it deposited into another person’s account-especially when that person is linked to Al Queda.

But the patriotic Left never lets the Constitution, legal precedent, or the facts get in the way of their love affair with militant Islam.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/23/AR2006062300167.html

 

[aquapub]

Peter King (R) NY, said that this act of sabatoge against a perfectly legal anti-terror operation needs to be prosecuted criminally.

He described this action by the NYT as them "putting their arrogant, elitist, left-wing agenda ahead of national security."

Inexcusable.

 

[Kandahar]

I like cheese.

 

[TheNextEra]

I see everyone is jumping on the NYT for printing the story, however, I see most people have missed the point entirely.

The NYT didn't just find this out on their own, there had to be a leak. Why no mention of the leak?

 

[TheNextEra]

But the patriotic Left never lets the Constitution, legal precedent, or the facts get in the way of their love affair with militant Islam.

Oh please, more partisan BS from the neocons. I suppose you heard that from Ann or Rush again.

 

[aquapub]

Oh please, more partisan BS from the neocons. I suppose you heard that from Ann or Rush again.

From the ACLU's refusal to get involved when a California school made 5th graders recite the pillars of Islam and wear Muslim garb to the constitutionally illiterate, hysterical pity-party the Left has thrown for the terror suspects being treated exactly the way POWs are supposed to be treated....

I can write a book with all the examples I have to back up that portrayal. Baselessly smearing me gets you nowhere. :mrgreen:

 

[aquapub]

I see everyone is jumping on the NYT for printing the story, however, I see most people have missed the point entirely.

The NYT didn't just find this out on their own, there had to be a leak. Why no mention of the leak?

Hypocrisy.

The Left's concern for national security leaks is incredibly selective. Where were you people when the existence of foreign interrogation centers was leaked?

I'll tell you where the Left was (I know because I was watching very closely), they were handing out Pulitzers and calling it a "service to democracy."

Oh wait, now acting concerned about national security leaks can divert attention away from the most slanted liberal paper in America committing treason, so naturally, the Left is going to be up in arms about leaks. :roll: