• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The law of self defense and Kyle Rittenhouse.

Hughinn

Banned
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
2,066
Reaction score
1,164
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
This podcast, puts that case in a real clear perspective.

The first 28 minutes should be listened to and contemplated by our resident leftists in particular.


The law in America is designed to protect the individual. Not empowering the establishment.

Of you think the jury got the verdict wrong, then you don't understand western jurisprudence and American law.
 
This podcast, puts that case in a real clear perspective.

The first 28 minutes should be listened to and contemplated by our resident leftists in particular.


The law in America is designed to protect the individual. Not empowering the establishment.

I have no issue with the Rittenhouse verdict but Citizens United is contradictory to your statement.

Of you think the jury got the verdict wrong, then you don't understand western jurisprudence and American law.
 
You didn't listen to the podcast. Not enough time.

Good bye
Of course not. I am sitting in a parking lot waiting for the wife to get out of Ulta and my reception is sucking.

Not being snarky at all but was citizens united mentioned in the podcast?
 
Of course not. I am sitting in a parking lot waiting for the wife to get out of Ulta and my reception is sucking.

Not being snarky at all but was citizens united mentioned in the podcast?

Sounds like you should listen to the podcast.
Then, by all means, go ahead and comment.
 
The first 28 minutes should be listened to and contemplated by our resident leftists in particular.
I’m literally a socialist and I agree with the verdict.

How are we still talking about this issue?
 
This podcast, puts that case in a real clear perspective.

The first 28 minutes should be listened to and contemplated by our resident leftists in particular.


The law in America is designed to protect the individual. Not empowering the establishment.

Of you think the jury got the verdict wrong, then you don't understand western jurisprudence and American law.
I doubt anyone thinks the jury was wrong. The judge was a tad biased perhaps. Civil court will tell another story.
 
Another Rittenhouse thread, who saw that coming?
 
I’m literally a socialist and I agree with the verdict.

How are we still talking about this issue?

Because the fact that he was on trial at all is a reflection of inherent and blatant bias by our federal institutions.
 
Because the fact that he was on trial at all is a reflection of inherent and blatant bias by our federal institutions.
Bias against what, the killing of citizens by another citizen? Please explain and show proof of the bias, without referencing your own opinions. ;)

Btw, I thought it was the state that prosecuted Rittenhouse, how do the federal institutions fit in?
 
Sounds like you should listen to the podcast.
Then, by all means, go ahead and comment.

He actually thinks he can hand out homework assignments on a debate site...

:ROFLMAO:
 
Because the fact that he was on trial at all is a reflection of inherent and blatant bias by our federal institutions.
It's my understanding that when you kill someone it's pretty responsible to bring charges up.

Do you have any evidence that it isn't normal to charge someone in a circumstance like this?
 
Because the fact that he was on trial at all is a reflection of inherent and blatant bias by our federal institutions.
I wasn’t aware the Rittenhouse trial was in Federal court…..oh, that’s right there were cameras, so it wasn’t!


I thought Geico retired the ‘Caveman” ads??
 
It's my understanding that when you kill someone it's pretty responsible to bring charges up.

Do you have any evidence that it isn't normal to charge someone in a circumstance like this?


The whole thing was on video.

It was clearly self defense. It is not typical to prosecute a case of self defense.

It was done to propagate the lie that it was a racially motivated murder to spread hatred and chaos.

The media amd the democrat party lied about the facts of the case, just like they lied about the Jakob Blake shooting. Just like the lies they tell every day.
 
I wasn’t aware the Rittenhouse trial was in Federal court…..oh, that’s right there were cameras, so it wasn’t!


I thought Geico retired the ‘Caveman” ads??


Rittenhouse was prosecuted by the lying mainstream media and the democrat party. Just like they lied about the Jakob Blake shooting, they lied about Kyle Rittenhouse and the circumstances behind his case.

The democrat party promoted, funded and helped organize the violence that led to the Rittenhouse shooting. And they did it totally intentionally
 
Rittenhouse was prosecuted by the lying mainstream media and the democrat party. Just like they lied about the Jakob Blake shooting, they lied about Kyle Rittenhouse and the circumstances behind his case.

The democrat party promoted, funded and helped organize the violence that led to the Rittenhouse shooting. And they did it totally intentionally
What does that crapola have to do with the Federal government ?
 
What does that crapola have to do with the Federal government ?
The mainstream media is who convicted Kyle Rittenhouse.

That is to say, the propaganda networks of the federal government and democrat party.

The mainstream media, the democrat party, and the entrenched burocracy are all one in the same.
 
The whole thing was on video.

It was clearly self defense. It is not typical to prosecute a case of self defense.

It was done to propagate the lie that it was a racially motivated murder to spread hatred and chaos.

The media amd the democrat party lied about the facts of the case, just like they lied about the Jakob Blake shooting. Just like the lies they tell every day.

I feel like it, Rittenhouse case, was also a swipe at gun control laws
 
The mainstream media is who convicted Kyle Rittenhouse.

That is to say, the propaganda networks of the federal government and democrat party.

The mainstream media, the democrat party, and the entrenched burocracy are all one in the same.

I feel like it, Rittenhouse case, was also a swipe at gun control laws


All of reality conspires to victimize the poor poor Trumpists.
 
All of reality conspires to victimize the poor poor Trumpists.

Obviously, the mainstream media and democrat party propaganda doesn't report reality.

Otherwise Kyle Rittenhouse would be in jail, and nick sandmanm wouldn't be a millionaire, Jakob Blake wouldn't be a criminal sex offender , and Michelle obama would really be "oppressed"
 
imo Rittenhouse got the verdict expected......I dont have a problem with that.......what I have a problem with is the mentality of a 17 year old kid going to a volatile civil unrest demonstration carrying a military firearm and extra ammo......where the hell did he get this idea that he could just walk down the street in those circumstances and not be noticed (which of course was what he wanted without the killing) and potentially be accosted......how did a 17 year old kid get the idea that 'playing cowboy' with real guns and a real situation of danger could not or would not result in death......our nation is numb to violence and death by violence.....this numbness has passed on to our children.....we have no sense of remorse or consequence......good and bad have lost their meaning.....it's all a movie or a video game.....
 
Back
Top Bottom