• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Law (by Frederic Bastiat)

Canell

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
1,170
Location
EUSSR
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Howdy!

It seems to me that everyone doing and studying some politics should read this remarkable work - The Law (by Frederic Bastiat).

Unfortunately, the world has gone deeply in the "wrong" direction, the one that Bastiat would call "socialism" (what is socialism is another topic but he obviously means some state socialism like the one in the USSR. Just for your reference, I happen to believe in another definition of socialism, for example). Anyway, let me quote some of his thoughts for you and see how they fit in today's world, USA included.


Sounds familiar?
 
Last edited:
I like Bastiat and find that many things he said rind a little too true for my comfort.

I am wondering; are you applying this to current politics in general or a specific current event?
 
I like Bastiat and find that many things he said rind a little too true for my comfort.

I am wondering; are you applying this to current politics in general or a specific current event?

In general. Holly cow, look at the EU and the US - they become more and more "socialist" every day! Bastiat must be watching with sadness from his grave ( I hope he's not though).
 
He and a few other greats, as well. Adam Smith, for instance.

I agree that we are headed down a very dangerous path in both the US and EU. I still hold out some hope, but it will take time. We certainly won't gain much ground in the US right now. People are hating the extreme right and left and those are what's being offered, so we just keep swinging back and forth trying to get away from each one.
 
People are hating the extreme right and left and those are what's being offered, so we just keep swinging back and forth trying to get away from each one.

Yeah. I refer back to Bastiat (see OP):

Another effect of this tragic perversion of the law is that it gives an exaggerated importance to political passions and conflicts, and to politics in general...

:elephantf :donkeyfla
 
I must admit that prior to this thread, I never heard of the man. I like his take on law and morality, so I think I'll spend some time and see what he is all about.
 
I must admit that prior to this thread, I never heard of the man. I like his take on law and morality, so I think I'll spend some time and see what he is all about.

Check out Adam Smith while you're at it.
 
Canell...glad to see another fan of Bastiat on this forum. Personally, in my opinion Bastiat's greatest contribution to society was his development of the concept of opportunity cost. It's a real shame he didn't live longer.

If you get a chance you should check out my post...The Blind Men and the Scope of Government...and share your feedback on the value of allowing taxpayers to consider the opportunity costs of their tax allocation decisions.
 
I'm not sure how that applies specifically to socialism?
 

Like any black and white principal put to paper, in some cases Bastiet is correct and in some cases not. Real life is always full of caveats and simplistic arguments such of this never work well.
 

Bastiat is a pretty great writer, even for now.
"The Candlemaker's petition" is a great one too, kinda like "I,Pencil."

Under appreciated in the world of economic writers.
 
I'm not sure how that applies specifically to socialism?

He is taking the tax from one and spend on another being socialism perspective.
 
Like any black and white principal put to paper, in some cases Bastiet is correct and in some cases not. Real life is always full of caveats and simplistic arguments such of this never work well.

Of course, but his writings were meant to convey a point to the common individual for them to better understand the core principle.
Including all the specific caveats, exceptions, occurrences would not be "pretty" in literary terms.
 
Of course, but his writings were meant to convey a point to the common individual for them to better understand the core principle.
Including all the specific caveats, exceptions, occurrences would not be "pretty" in literary terms.

Then it suffers from the same problem as most philosophical treatises, it does not do its subject the same justice as raw data does.
 
Then it suffers from the same problem as most philosophical treatises, it does not do its subject the same justice as raw data does.

Raw data has it's own problems.
Sometimes painting a false picture of a given situation.

Nothing is without it's problems.
All his treatise's are about the philosophy of the early liberals.
 

OK, I'll try to find this in my language. It'll be easier for me.

I'm not sure how that applies specifically to socialism?

Now, there is socialism and there is socialism, and there is socialism. Unfortunately, the term has been so abused that it has become dangerous to use, as it shows. I think Bastiat refers to the type of socialism we had in the USSR (a dictatorship by a small group of very powerful men) and is spreading now like fire in the West (bailouts, handouts, buyouts, heavy debt, concentration of power, etc).

Like any black and white principal put to paper, in some cases Bastiet is correct and in some cases not. Real life is always full of caveats and simplistic arguments such of this never work well.

They work for me, like 2+2=4 and that's that.
 

I don't think Bastiat was referring to Soviet style socialism. The Law was published in 1850 (the same year of his untimely death), the Russian revolution that overthrew the Czars and created the Soviet Union was happened 67 years later, in 1917. Bastiat was not envisioning a Leninist Russia.

From his book, Economic Harmonies, The economists observe man, the laws of his nature and the social relations that derive from these laws. The socialists conjure up a society out of their imagination and then conceive of a human heart to fit this society. Bastiat was a classical liberal who believed that social order is the result of human action, not of human design.

Bastiat talks about this quality inherent in socialism in the The Law: The Socialists Wish to Play God.
The Law, by Frederic Bastiat

Bastiat also warns of the seductive lure of socialism in The Law.
 
He is taking the tax from one and spend on another being socialism perspective.

And yet, many of those who claim to be capitalists approved of this very same thing with TARP.
 
They work for me, like 2+2=4 and that's that.

Human behavior is nowhere near as deterministic or predictable as a simple equation.
 

Certainly he didn't. I think he had in mind the bitter "socialist" experience of the French revolution.

I am a socialist myself, whatever that may sound to you. In fact, I don't see any difference between "genuine" socialism (at least what the etymology of the word suggests) and democracy as they both mean to me "rule by the people". Sadly, historically socialism was twisted in "rule the people" ideology, better described by Gary Allen as:


Bastiat talks about this quality inherent in socialism in the The Law: The Socialists Wish to Play God.

Yes, if you want to impose socialism on other people, this is certainly true. If you want to invite them to your socialist "party", it isn't.
 
G. Edward Griffin on "legal plunder", capitalism ,socialism and so on.

 
G. Edward Griffin on "legal plunder", capitalism ,socialism and so on.
Thanks for sharing this. His distinction between collectivism and individualism is succinct and clarifying. Either the purpose of the state is to serve the people, or the purpose of the people is to serve the state.
 
The Law by Frederic Bastiat is my favorite book. I have been recommending it for years now. Obviously liberals that enjoy everything that he says is wrong won't agree, but I'm not expecting anything from them.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…