- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Messages
- 18,798
- Reaction score
- 11,533
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
This is still bothering me. "First light" of any telescope is when it's set up and pointed at a stellar object. In the case of the Webb, "setting up" is a very protracted process BUT it comes after first light: they're using the LMC (a small nearby galaxy) uh, HD 84406, a common star ... to calibrate the mirrors.
(There's another puzzle: why would they choose a star with high proper motion, instead of a distant galaxy? The more you know, I guess)
I think NASA have underestimated the public interest in watching a fuzzy blob gradually resolve into a super-sharp picture of a galaxy. Maybe it would be too slow to hold some people's interest, but I'd love to check in from time to time on the fuzzy blob!
(There's another puzzle: why would they choose a star with high proper motion, instead of a distant galaxy? The more you know, I guess)
I think NASA have underestimated the public interest in watching a fuzzy blob gradually resolve into a super-sharp picture of a galaxy. Maybe it would be too slow to hold some people's interest, but I'd love to check in from time to time on the fuzzy blob!
Last edited: