SixStringHero said:
Putting people on IGNORE because you don't like what they have to say is weak.
Why debate at all?
[clicks on "view post"]
hmmm.
I disagree with you, sixstringhero. what happened here? there was a mention of hypocrisy, and it was pointed out that someone (nameless) of a liberal persuasion (we suppose) compared Obama with JFK. but guess what? a Conservative has compared Obama and JFK too! and guess what else? he did it on, *gasp*, the Fox Opinion Channel.
so where is the hypocrisy? (I don't expect you to answer this question, but by all means, please try, if you're game).
and guess what else, sixstringhero? the debate is over. what is NavyPride's point anyway? that MSNBC is a Liberal network because someone made the comparison? well, a Conservative network did the same thing. is the point that people shouldn't have their own opinions? is the point that people shouldn't state opinions on a cable channel?
but then, did you notice what happened, sixstring? didjya? It appears that you didn't. so I'll fill you in. NavyPride responded to me, saying that Obama is no JFK. well, maybe I even agree with NavyPride. but was that ever the point? and how does one debate comparisons that are mere opinions stated with no backing evidence? and what is the point of said comparisons anyway? I applaud NavyPride's right to say them. but I don't have to read them. and even after I did, I noticed (again) that there was nothing to debate.
here's the thing, sixstringhero, no matter how you slice it, NavyPride has made no rational point. NavyPride has made no sense.
oh, oh, oh, and guess what else, sixstringhero? NavyPride does this all day long every day. but I wouldn't have said that at all just now, if you hadn't attacked me. I'm merely responding to your charges. so, sixstringhero, what does your post have to do with the topic, anyway? I was just politely letting NavyPride know that I wasn't going to respond to his post.
so, here's the crux, sixstringhero, while you're busy reading nonsense, I won't be. and furthermore, sixstringhero, here's what's REALLY weak: not trying hard to explain one's position. not making an effort to perceive things for what they are. being so partisan that you can't think straight. those things are weak. if you think I'm weak because I don't want to read goofball nonsense, then great. great, for you. go on, read it all. I won't label you for doing so.
oh, oh, and also, sixstringhero, I do debate. almost every day. how about a private debate between you and me? the topic can be your choice. I'd even welcome a guitar-related-topic debate. or, are you, ahem, "weak?"