- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Your assertions are quite vapid, yes.
You can't refute anything I say, so where's that leave your vapid opinion then.
Your assertions are quite vapid, yes.
You can't refute anything I say, so where's that leave your vapid opinion then.
I think that guy got wasted in this movie
warning-massive machine gun violence!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNM7PmOkBxE
Possibly the dreamiest pic on DB.
:2party:
Cool, kinda. That guy in the pic really is me.
you could get some work if they make a sequel or a remake!
Hmmm any guess jet who was in their cross hairs?"Schemes to disarm you", is an outright lie. "Gun control Trickery" is just BS aimed at the ignorant.
Hehehe...great comeback. Your version of the old grade school, "I know you are but what am I".
Hmmm any guess jet who was in their cross hairs?
She's one person: do you still have your right to keep and bear?
Yes you do.
Your hyperbole shows how gullible you are.
Not my fault you can't debate well dude.
Read some books.
Better luck next time.
I have been saying this for years. and here is some more proof
Connecticut Rep. Esty Encourages Gun Control Trickery - LPP
According to the Connecticut Post, while speaking to an audience at a recent Pride Fund event Esty said they should never use the term “gun control” but always use the term “gun safety.” Talking about gun control immediately alienates approximately 15 percent of male voters.
PJ Media reported that Esty offered the advice to people who were advocating for tougher gun laws. They simply want to create the impression they’re talking about something else, but when it comes to genuine gun safety, there is only one side that teaches that, and it’s not the gun control crowd.
so when you hear crap like "gun safety" or "common sense" or "reasonable" gun laws you know its going to be more schemes to disarm you and rape your second amendment rights
I could name many many more. Pretending that there are not people out there that want guns banned is nothing but dishonest Jet. But then that's what I've come to expect.
Sure there are people out there that want guns banned, but they have no juice. They can says whatever they want; guns are not being "banned" in the context that you're trying to work into this.
Sure there are people out there that want guns banned, but they have no juice. They can says whatever they want; guns are not being "banned" in the context that you're trying to work into this.
Hehehe....if that helps your self esteem, good for you Jet. Own it.
And yet they are trying. And trying to do so in dishonest ways such as changing terminology of the words they use in order to try and influence more people.
Bret he owns lots of books comic books I bet. I realize the context owns is used in.Hehehe....if that helps your self esteem, good for you Jet. Own it.
Familiar with all of their code words.Same ideas probably have influenced the name of the movement being "Pro-Choice" instead of "Baby Killers".
There goal is obvious, the end game is a flat out ban, crawled towards in incremental degrees under these guises as americans will not embrace an overnight all out ban.
I call on reasonable people to see this, great post Turtledude!:applaud
Cant have mine! View attachment 67219089
https://www.schatzanderson.com/information-and-resources/20-common-felony-crimes-u-s/Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you tell us you were a felon?
(chuckle)
Dude; how about you just admit that you're wrong. I provide proof that my argument not just about the second, but the proper policy of gun control is not only accurate, but intended as good public policy against abuses. Moreover the history of gun control in the US, which I've also posted several times further indicates how out of touch with reality your argument is: you may not like that reality, and it may fly in the face of your own personal interpretation of the second amendment, but it is a set of policies that has over and over again passed constitutional muster; wherein it had been challenged, so your blustering is just sour grapes.
Now Turtledude for his part, as in the OP of this thread, consistently obfuscates the second amendment and court rulings that show absolutely that HIS interpretations are grossly incorrect but also fly in the face of his political prejudices and his only defense is ad-hom and personal attack coupled with charges of some sort unpatriotic underpinnings, and all because he too is an ineffective arguer.
Turtledude's business is guns - okay... That's where he's coming from. Therefore anything that encroaches on his abilities to do business in these threads is considered anti-gun, anti-American lying and cheating when the very record on the subject shows just how wrong he really is, and therefore his minions here are equally wrong.
When you follow his rhetoric like you do, you set yourself up for failure immediately.
So, better luck next time.
Another ironic post for a gun owner, or do you deny being a gun owner?
No need to explain yourself Jet. You go ahead and believe what you want to believe. It's your own little world you live in so you go ahead and be king if that helps in some way.
(chuckle)
Dude; how about you just admit that you're wrong. I provide proof that my argument not just about the second, but the proper policy of gun control is not only accurate, but intended as good public policy against abuses. Moreover the history of gun control in the US, which I've also posted several times further indicates how out of touch with reality your argument is: you may not like that reality, and it may fly in the face of your own personal interpretation of the second amendment, but it is a set of policies that has over and over again passed constitutional muster; wherein it had been challenged, so your blustering is just sour grapes.
Now Turtledude for his part, as in the OP of this thread, consistently obfuscates the second amendment and court rulings that show absolutely that HIS interpretations are grossly incorrect but also fly in the face of his political prejudices and his only defense is ad-hom and personal attack coupled with charges of some sort unpatriotic underpinnings, and all because he too is an ineffective arguer.
Turtledude's business is guns - okay... That's where he's coming from. Therefore anything that encroaches on his abilities to do business in these threads is considered anti-gun, anti-American lying and cheating when the very record on the subject shows just how wrong he really is, and therefore his minions here are equally wrong.
When you follow his rhetoric like you do, you set yourself up for failure immediately.
So, better luck next time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?