• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The future of the media (1 Viewer)

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,321
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Check out http://mccd.udc.es/orihuela/epic/ for an interesting interpretation of what the media might be like by 2014. What are your thoughts? Will the traditional media wane as blogs become more popular? If so, is this a good or a bad thing? Would "personalized news" be convenient, or an invasion of privacy?


(This thread isn't really about bias in the media persay, but I didn't know where else to put it. This forum seemed like the best fit.)
 
Kandahar said:
Check out http://mccd.udc.es/orihuela/epic/ for an interesting interpretation of what the media might be like by 2014. What are your thoughts? Will the traditional media wane as blogs become more popular? If so, is this a good or a bad thing? Would "personalized news" be convenient, or an invasion of privacy?


(This thread isn't really about bias in the media persay, but I didn't know where else to put it. This forum seemed like the best fit.)

I think we are already living in the world they predicted, you can already find whatever news you want to read today, but is it harmful?

I don't know, but I do know I find it frustrating at times, as I always want the facts, but I don't really have the right to not be frustrated, so I continue to build web sites, and contribute to others.
 
The guy really likes Google lol.
Hmmm, it's quite an interesting concept though.
But the main point is how e-paper has to be cheaper then newspaper. I don't see that happening in any possible way unless there's some sudden regulation.
 
Saw a report somewhere today that AOL is contemplating making its service free to broadband customers. Their income would be derived solely from advertising. Will post a link if I can remember where I saw that...
 
jfuh said:
The guy really likes Google lol.
Hmmm, it's quite an interesting concept though.
But the main point is how e-paper has to be cheaper then newspaper. I don't see that happening in any possible way unless there's some sudden regulation.

It's already coming relatively close to matching the cost of regular paper (if you factor in the fact that you don't need to replace e-paper), and the price is still dropping. It'll take a few years, but not as long as people might think. Here's a cool article on it if you're interested: http://neasia.nikkeibp.com/neasia/003542
 
Last edited:
Kandahar said:
Check out http://mccd.udc.es/orihuela/epic/ for an interesting interpretation of what the media might be like by 2014. What are your thoughts? Will the traditional media wane as blogs become more popular? If so, is this a good or a bad thing? Would "personalized news" be convenient, or an invasion of privacy?


(This thread isn't really about bias in the media persay, but I didn't know where else to put it. This forum seemed like the best fit.)

Very interesting predictions. If you look at it, both the left and the right here despise the current media for different reasons.

I think in the future all news will be on demand, instant access. I can't even tell you the last time I watched or listened to a show in real time, except for the Super Bowl ( Go Steelers!) With DVR's, Tivo, Ipods, Blogs, Satelite Radio, etc. comercial media as we know it is dead.

The major news outlets are owned by 6 corportations, with the FCC on it's way to allow for more mergers. Indy Media is the future.

Googlezon: Love it!
 
If the republicans have their way and they manage to kill net neutrality, this will never happen. Many blogs are run by individual who aren't going to be able or willing to pay an ISP to give users decent access speed to their site, which will lead to fewer hits, and ultimately the death of the site. It'll be Fox News and Limbaugh from here on out unless voters do something about it.
 
Icarus said:
If the republicans have their way and they manage to kill net neutrality, this will never happen. Many blogs are run by individual who aren't going to be able or willing to pay an ISP to give users decent access speed to their site, which will lead to fewer hits, and ultimately the death of the site. It'll be Fox News and Limbaugh from here on out unless voters do something about it.

LOL............I got nothing...................LOL!:rofl
 
In your silence, since you "got nothing", you might wanna look at the voting record for this issue and ask yourself why exactly republicans are so eager to make it more difficult to reach sites that don't pay fees (in addition to their bandwidth bills, which more than cover an ISPs costs of doing business and gives them a nice, fat profit by the way), or if you have as of yet not managed to grasp what net neutrality is, look up that, and get back to us. Or you can post cute emoticons in place of an actual point, either one.
 
Icarus said:
In your silence, since you "got nothing", you might wanna look at the voting record for this issue and ask yourself why exactly republicans are so eager to make it more difficult to reach sites that don't pay fees (in addition to their bandwidth bills, which more than cover an ISPs costs of doing business and gives them a nice, fat profit by the way), or if you have as of yet not managed to grasp what net neutrality is, look up that, and get back to us. Or you can post cute emoticons in place of an actual point, either one.

It's bigger then you son, it's capitalism, pay. or get out of the way. I think you lazy no goods, have had your free ride long enough, it's time to get a job(not directing this at anyone here) I think you should have to pay to play, if not, there are plenty of freebees all over the net, I can't seem to shed a tear!:doh
 
Wow, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid that post was. It was as though you were attempting to use words to commit a hate crime on intelligence. Pay or get out of the way? I'm already paying, and so are ALL e-businesses! That's what bandwidth bills are, you are paying for everything they offer, absolutely everything, there is no free ride here. What the GOP is proposing (at the behest of the corporation that have had the corrupt party in their pocket for a long, long time) is that sites be required to pay huge fees to regional monopolies in order to keep the speed they have right now, and those who don't pay (sites like Wikipedia, every independent blog on the face of the earth, internet business upstarts that could have been the next amazon or google if only they had the bandwidth to be attractive to consumers) will have their speed crippled or, more than likely, will have their sites blocked entirely. The GOP wants a slower, more expensive internet service that is more difficult to use both for business and at home, they want to kill the independent "future of the media" that has been exposing the crap lines they feed to people day in and day out, they want to bring an end to the information age and basically put America into a position where it simply can't compete with many other nations both economically (a UK based website that pays no such fees will offer cheaper service and make more profit, for instance) and technologically (as the increased price of broadband adoption will slow the rate at which American's get high speed internet access, just a few short years after the government was pushing for a fiber optic line to every door). It's sad that you can't get over your party long enough to see that they're bending the average American over here, and that they have the best interests of telecom company's and not the citizens that put them into office here.

To put it simply, you pay your ISP a charge for bandwidth, for the fastest download/upload speed that your speed tiers servers can support, regardless of content. That is what you are paying for. If the Telecoms and their republican lackey's have their way, you will be paying for that service, and then paying an additional fee to ensure that you get the service that you just paid for. It'd be like going to walmart, buying a shirt, and then having the cashier hold your product hostage and tell you that she's decided she deserves and extra ten bucks before you can get what you just paid for, the whole thing is just absolutely ridiculous. Only the most fanatically blind conservative fool could muster any support for something like this. The future of the media? Fox News. Outright propaganda, lies, spin, nothing new, because a bunch of idiots who got elected based on their dislike of boys kissing were allowed to blatantly harm the people they are supposed to represent on the orders of their corporation campaign funder of choice. There's your "future of the media", same crap as we have right now, but without the independent voices on the internet.
 
My prediction is that in the year 2014, we’ll have machines that insert information directly into our brains. There won’t be any need to think about stuff, because these machines will be smart enough to do that for us. They’ll package everything so cogently that we can just repeat whatever they say, because if you tried to think up something like that in your own words, it’d come out so garbled and inarticulate that you’d end up just making a fool of yourself. No, everything in the world would be perfect and run harmoniously because we could all agree on the useful stuff that’s directly inserted into our brains, and everything else would be so inconsequential as to not matter at all.

*wistful sigh* Oh, I can’t wait for the wonders that the future has in store for us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom