• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The far left, the intolerant left, the intimidating left, and Pelosi.

Yeah...



You wanna restate your position one more ****ing time? :lol:







It's like fish in a barrel.

most any idiot would recognize that as a posted comment from a news source, not you though.
 
When were GOP elites pushed out? It's been a lot of the same people still in there, and the one's Trump appoints are all rather elite parts of the swamp. You can't tell me a coal tycoon for the EPA, isn't Elitism, and corruption of that group.

There were 16 GOP Elites kicked to the curb in 2016. There have been others in the two years since then.

This https://www.debatepolitics.com/gene...and-pelosi-post1069320195.html#post1069320195 applies to your post, too.
 
most any idiot would recognize that as a posted comment from a news source, not you though.

Would they? I quoted you directly. A quote where you claim to have quoted someone else using no formatting like quotes or a quote box, or an attribution. How would "most any idiot" recognize that as a quote? :lol:
 
Not going to read that. Just answer my question: The House always votes for a Speaker. What is authoritarian in this?

THE SIMPLE FACT THAT OTHER DEMS ARE SCARED TO RUN AND SUPPORTERS OF Pelosi ARE THREATENING DEMS TO VOTE FOR HER,
 
Would they? I quoted you directly. A quote where you claim to have quoted someone else using no formatting like quotes or a quote box, or an attribution. How would "most any idiot" recognize that as a quote? :lol:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/th...ists-threaten-backlash-to-dems-who-oppose-her

As Nancy Pelosi faces a grueling fight with her own members to regain the speaker’s gavel in January, pro-Pelosi left-wing activist groups are warning of a "backlash" against House Democrats who oppose her.

AN EXCERPT FROM THE ARTICLE 2 POSTS ABOVE YOURS.

BUT THEN YOU DO NOT READ SO I APOLOGIZE.
 
There were 16 GOP Elites kicked to the curb in 2016. There have been others in the two years since then.

This https://www.debatepolitics.com/gene...and-pelosi-post1069320195.html#post1069320195 applies to your post, too.

If anyone thinks any elites are being kicked to the curb on any side, they are only kidding themselves. You can't out the old ones, bring new ones in, and call it draining the swamp. Some of Trumps appointees were elites, that would hinder what he appointed them to. Even the Democrats couldn't handle a non elite approach. They had someone with non elite ideals, and the head of the DNC decided to work against their own member. Despite what his fanbase thinks, you went from politicians serving the elite, to cutting out the middle man, and just giving it straight to the elite.
 
THE SIMPLE FACT THAT OTHER DEMS ARE SCARED TO RUN AND SUPPORTERS OF Pelosi ARE THREATENING DEMS TO VOTE FOR HER,


Okay. That has nothing to do with authoritarianism.
 
If anyone thinks any elites are being kicked to the curb on any side, they are only kidding themselves. You can't out the old ones, bring new ones in, and call it draining the swamp. Some of Trumps appointees were elites, that would hinder what he appointed them to. Even the Democrats couldn't handle a non elite approach. They had someone with non elite ideals, and the head of the DNC decided to work against their own member. Despite what his fanbase thinks, you went from politicians serving the elite, to cutting out the middle man, and just giving it straight to the elite.

Flake will be happy to hear this.

That Dem barista babe might disagree with you, though.
 
it seems that the left is more authoritarian but that escapes you.

more or less like a 50 year old with a 16 year old girlfriend does not get upset when a 19 year old dates a 12 year old.
WTF? That post should be saved for posterity.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
 
anacleto-gif-8.gif

Dang! You really nailed the response.
 
it seems that the left is more authoritarian but that escapes you.

more or less like a 50 year old with a 16 year old girlfriend does not get upset when a 19 year old dates a 12 year old.

I had heard about stuff like this before. What state do you live in?
 
The House votes for Speaker.
Nothing you've said refutes this.

avoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
 
in a process similar to that of the Soviet Union, nothing you have said refutes that.

Nothing you are saying makes any sense. Do you even know how the US House of Representatives chooses a Speaker? Do you even know what the Speaker of the House is?!
 
The House votes for Speaker.
Nothing you've said refutes this.

Soviet democracy (sometimes council democracy) is a political system in which the rule of the population by directly elected soviets (Russian for "council") is exercised. The councils are directly responsible to their electors and are bound by their instructions. Such an imperative mandate is in contrast to a free mandate, in which the elected delegates are only responsible to their conscience. Delegates may accordingly be dismissed from their post at any time or be voted out (recall).
In a Soviet democracy, voters are organized in basic units, for example the workers of a company, the in…
 
Nothing you are saying makes any sense. Do you even know how the US House of Representatives chooses a Speaker? Do you even know what the Speaker of the House is?!

first the caucus votes, then the house votes. do you know how the soviets selected officials.
 
Soviet democracy (sometimes council democracy) is a political system in which the rule of the population by directly elected soviets (Russian for "council") is exercised. The councils are directly responsible to their electors and are bound by their instructions. Such an imperative mandate is in contrast to a free mandate, in which the elected delegates are only responsible to their conscience. Delegates may accordingly be dismissed from their post at any time or be voted out (recall).
In a Soviet democracy, voters are organized in basic units, for example the workers of a company, the in…


You have no idea what the House of Representatives is. Are you a russian troll?
 
Back
Top Bottom