First you are not capable to define your own position in a coherent way, and now you surrender your position because you are not capable of defending your self.
My guess now is that you are just stuck in movie land, which means you were expecting Darth Vader to be referred to as some kind of metaphor or that Luke Skywalker is a real person.
Your words demonstrate immaturity.
=======================================
You and I have been over this before that there is lots of real evidence that God exist:
1) Scientific proof as like the "Big Bang" is proof of a Creation Day.
2) Evolution is proof of the ongoing Intelligent Design.
3) The reality of spirits and Ghost and Demons is a proof of a real spirit life and spirit world.
4) Plus the fantastic revelations given in the Bible is proof too, see US & B in Prophesy.
and unfortunately your words represent nothing short of idiocy.sorry to be so blunt, but you make absolutely no senseFirst you are not capable to define your own position in a coherent way, and now you surrender your position because you are not capable of defending your self.
My guess now is that you are just stuck in movie land, which means you were expecting Darth Vader to be referred to as some kind of metaphor or that Luke Skywalker is a real person.
Your words demonstrate immaturity.
=======================================
.
Obviously you have no idea of what "faith" really means.No, that is pure faith on your part. Why is the Big Bang proof of god? Who created your god?
Also I did not say that the "Big Bang" was a proof of God, as it is a proof of the Creation Day, and that Creation Day is the self-evident proof of God.
While I have not knowledge of your "PLUTO" there is a distuted planet, and a character, however Basically we are on the same page.Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it is just changing form. (Thermodynamics) Then why is there energy? The Constructal Law makes it much more meaningful. Our Universe consists of various flow systems, and systems will align its structure to further facilitate the system's flow. That is why there is common structure in nature. Why trees are shaped like lungs, our arteries compared to our neurons, and electricity to branches. The structure is the same because the system changed structure to increase the efficiency of that system. But what about the flow system of energy itself? Put simply, successful mutations resulted in outcomes that were more efficient at transporting energy. So if the evolution of the inanimate system are under the right conditions, energy will be fully expressed thru life. The species that are higher on the food chain are able to move more energy per unit of energy compared to the species below them on the food chain.
Pluto had a philosophy that there was a life force in all things. But when humanity was able to cut thru a rock and see there are no breathing parts, De Cartes was created to fulfill the void. Basically the universe consists of various processes that we can learn about. This results for no rsetraint at using Earth's resources for profit because it is non-living.
The Gaia Hypothesis states that The Earth is a perfect super-organism, and that the inanimate have a symbiotic relationship with the animate. What the Constructal Law is showing that it is from the inanimate that created life thru the flow system of energy itself.
I'm self-educated. I read non-fiction as much as I can, and I read on topics that I am interested about. All of these ideas can be found in books seperately, however understanding how they inter-twine is another feat. What I just shared, is a brief synopsis of what reality is in front of me based upon the relationships of those ideas outlined above. That part is my doing, the rest is just reading those works.
While I have not knowledge of your "PLUTO" there is a distuted planet, and a character, however Basically we are on the same page.
That is a logical and sensible deduction, and best of all is that it is so realistic.To me, the parallel existence is where the afterlife could exist, and in my opinion does.[
First you are not capable to define your own position in a coherent way, and now you surrender your position because you are not capable of defending your self.
My guess now is that you are just stuck in movie land, which means you were expecting Darth Vader to be referred to as some kind of metaphor or that Luke Skywalker is a real person.
Your words demonstrate immaturity.
=======================================
You and I have been over this before that there is lots of real evidence that God exist:
1) Scientific proof as like the "Big Bang" is proof of a Creation Day.
Please provide any evidence that 'spirits and ghosts and demons' are more than peoples imagination.3) The reality of spirits and Ghost and Demons is a proof of a real spirit life and spirit world.
4) Plus the fantastic revelations given in the Bible is proof too, see US & B in Prophesy.
That can only be done by honesty, and there is no way to get around that criteria.Please provide any evidence that 'spirits and ghosts and demons' are more than peoples imagination.
I can show to my self that those claims are true and correct, but for you or for anyone else then you must do your own seeing and knowing for your self.Can you show that these claims for prophecy are actually real, rather than vague references, retrofitting after the fact, shoe honing, or self fulfilling prophecies?
That can only be done by honesty, and there is no way to get around that criteria.
As in I am being honest, and it is up to your self to be honest about that too.
No other evidence is needed or required.
If you wish to deny the reality of such things then that is not up to me to counter.
I can show to my self that those claims are true and correct, but for you or for anyone else then you must do your own seeing and knowing for your self.
No one can do that for you.
In my view then I am really pleased and proud of my response given there.Nice dodge, and also complete nonsense.
In my view then I am really pleased and proud of my response given there.
It went directly to the heart of the matter and it established the real boundary for the truth.
That can only be done by honesty, and there is no way to get around that criteria.
As in I am being honest, and it is up to your self to be honest about that too.
No other evidence is needed or required.
If you wish to deny the reality of such things then that is not up to me to counter.
I can show to my self that those claims are true and correct, but for you or for anyone else then you must do your own seeing and knowing for your self.
No one can do that for you.
It was you your self who put God into the very first and opening posting as a part of the thread subject, and God has remained the topic ever after.P.S. Get off the God thing-if it was done by God so be it but that three letter word has no place here or anywhere in science.
It was you your self who put God into the very first and opening posting as a part of the thread subject, and God has remained the topic ever after.
Sir, * I appologized to you because I realized we were on different planes and, could not come together, I was quite content to leave it as two people with different opinions, However, It appears that you need to get nasty about it, so, OK, IN RESPONSEFirst you are not capable to define your own position in a coherent way, and now you surrender your position because you are not capable of defending your self.
My guess now is that you are just stuck in movie land, which means you were expecting Darth Vader to be referred to as some kind of metaphor or that Luke Skywalker is a real person.
Your words demonstrate immaturity.l
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?