goligoth
Active member
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Messages
- 323
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- location
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Connecticutter said:I don't know exactly how the targeting will change, but my guess is that you'd see less money going in to campaign ads for Ohio and Florida, and more money going into campaign ads in New York, California, and Texas. Not that that's a bad thing.
You might be right....they would want to appeal to the most people a one time....they would go to the populacice centers, like new york or california, they would not want to spend much time in back-water ohio or wisconsin....oh well....it is a very very small loss if that is the worst thing to happen with a new system...
connecticutter said:They do this in many countries - France for example (not that we should emulate them ). It actually makes sense if you are looking for the candidate which would beat every other candidate in a two-way race.
No we can't emulate France....ever.....
In this new system, that I invented ,(sarcasm) you wouldn't have to worry about whether or not a candidate wins in one lonesome state, all of the votes would compile and even if it is down to the wire a winner would get chosen....