At best it is a misleading take on this.
“If you elect the wrong person, they can fix that shit” (quote from the clip) is not entirely accurate. While it is plausible for the EC to ignore the voter in a given state it is not very likely to happen and there could be repercussions for those that ignore their pledge, which is based on the vote from a given state. Your individual vote is not a practice vote or whatever else. “After we do our pretend voting” is also misleading, that is counted and is in several cases disputed (hence all the nonsense with the Cyber Ninjas going into AZ and coming up with a new outcome entirely to the demands of those that funded them.)
The EC comes up every vote for President to illustrate the pros and cons, and ultimately the whole thing devolves.
But there are a few truths worth noting. Just the existence of the EC does not make us a Republic, the framers specifically went with the EC to deal with conditions they thought would be influencers the further they went. Namely larger states rendering lesser populated states as not very important, and while the framers considered “uninformed voters” the concept originally assumed more often than not the EC would result in a tie forcing the House to solve the matter.
Our issues with the EC today is it virtually eliminates any possibility of a third party, and the further we go we run into conditions where the EC ends up out of alignment with the popular vote just because of states like California, Texas, Florida, New York and Pennsylvania (in that order.) Now that we have had this happen enough in the modern era it becomes a bit of a quagmire to say that particular President represents the will of the people.
I guess we could talk about tyranny of the majority / tyranny of the minority but overall the biggest issue I see is the impossibility of a strong force winning over Republicans and Democrats at the same time, entirely against the wishes of the framers we ended up with a duopoly.
And it continues to polarize in turn plague and rip the nation apart in a haze of political extremism and foolishness.
I would argue that the majority of this nation, who refuses to claim Democrat or Republican membership, is never really represented.