To the question of whether or not the American people approve of Trump's behavior, yes, it is.
Your position here is like arguing that Obama was a great president because look at how many people voted for him.
They show that Trump is unpopular, that is correct. You made the argument that one poll showed that on one day he was less unpopular than Obama was right after cramming Obamacare through in the face of massive opposition..... which in no way makes Trump popular.
Who's defending Obama?
Obviously.
You declared them to be unpatriotic because - like the rest of America - many of them do not approve of Trump's job performance.
So.... yeah. You did. All it took was for them to become semi-evenly-divided on the question for you to attack the Troops. As being unpatriotic. Congrats on the depths of your personality cult.
Putin has been making advances in Ukraine and threatening Eastern Europe, while POTUS tweets about how much he doesn't like media people. You could even look it up
.
Not really. He's doing pretty well for China, not least at our expense.
And our response was.... to shoot ourselves in the foot by making it more expensive for people like American manufacturers to operate. Huzzah.
I did see that - arrest of the CFO, no less. Congrats to the FBI and Treasury on a fantastic job, if they can pull that off.
Nope.
Yeah yeah yeah
Pollsters sure weren't on the correct side of the barn in the 2016 election result ... they've improved since then on the same topic, eh? Become more evenhanded in the intervening two years, have they?
:lamo
Hmmmm, think maybe some of our more addled folks here are clearly being taken clear advantage of by media?
Pitiful analogy, made no claim of anything of the sort. Try to be at least a little more honest, maybe? Ever hear of intellectual honesty? If so, if you believe it is important, please strive towards application.
Polls often show, as clearly proven in the lead up to that 2016 election concerning the very same man, what the pollsters want them to show. But wise folks believe them? Nah, wrong...we really really don't.
You. You are very much defending slenderman and his type of politicos, his policies, in myriad ways. Speaking well, articulate in attaining that intellectual high bar, which makes them okay since they appear to be so so sage...apparently sagely getting us into bad trade deals, wars in far distant foreign lands, squandering our wealth and letting our big business big government partnerships rule.
No thanks.
Just speaking the truth when asked. Means little... besides, I tend to hang with those who are nearby... and in Panama I am unaware of too many active duty personnel in country, yano?
And, if you are or are not in the military, you might be aware of the social engineering attempts, the purging of good command folk in the slenderman years? So, yes, I plausibly question some, perhaps many of the folks that replaced the good and the strong with potentially those more conciliatory towards the socialists, social engineers and misguided justice warriors.
DON'T EVER cut my phrasing off mid-sentence like that then LIE about what exactly I said.
Do it again we won't further engage... which is fine by me as I can hardly countenance so much petty, juvenile style complaining about the silly, non-important, delicate niceties rather than strong action, getting to the important, so often ignored and neglected, with issues accomplished...
Yet it is well noted that someone ***cough*** [you] cut off the entire segment of mine about EXACTLY what the President promised and what, in less than two years with an overly massive, bloated government, he has undeniably already accomplished.
Obviously, quite amazing feats...or you would not have CUT them ALL out. Ignoring reality doesn't make it go away. Should have included all the accomplishments and responded. Lack of intellectual honesty, failure, capitulation to petty complaints, putting form over substance?
What's the policy prescription of the old high bar intellectual crowd... nuke Russia over it?
Familiar with the situational nuances in the region, correct? You know, being up on things, past promises made regarding NATO, expansion and Russia. Maybe Russia, big bad Russia has some legitimacy in expressing dissatisfaction, some general some specific, in their area of the world. Whether Russia has any further rights, the extent of which is permissible, legal, understandable or debateable needs be discussed openly on the world stage.
I know you won't, but trust me, Trump's got this, he and team will work it out, massage to punch, whatever is necessary ...he is not handcuffed by pantywaists from doing exactly what's necessary.
Yano?
Didn't think so... oh my god Trump is going to dooOOooooom us all! Oh, nevermind. :doh