• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Dems' Agenda (1 Viewer)

Binary_Digit

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2005
Messages
10,219
Reaction score
11,604
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20061024/ts_usnews/thedemsagenda

The highlights include legislation initiatives that would increase the minimum wage, negotiate lower prices for Medicare prescription drugs, implement all the 9/11 commission recommendations, end tax breaks for oil companies, and increase federal funding for human embryonic stem cell research. "The hardest part, frankly, is limiting the priorities," says Pelosi

Their ability to push through major legislation will be limited because their majority will probably be slim, and President Bush could wield the veto pen. But many Democrats intend to push an aggressive oversight agenda that would investigate the Bush administration's conduct on everything from the war in Iraq to Hurricane Katrina and homeland security. There would be no shortage of fireworks on Capitol Hill.

But Republicans are pressing ahead. If Democrats take the House, they say, expect a leftist agenda of more spending, higher taxes, and maybe even an attempt at impeaching President Bush. "It's just plain scary," insists House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican.

While Democrats have lofty ambitions - some are calling for sweeping healthcare initiatives or withdrawal from Iraq - their actual legislative plans are more modest, because a slim majority will probably force them to work across the aisle. Otherwise, "we won't be able to get anything done," says Rangel. The Democrats also have fissures of their own to worry about - like what to do about Iraq.
I'm glad to see they want to implement all the security recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. Bush has done our national security a disservice by not giving them more attention. Who says dems are weak on national security?

The only thing here I don't agree with is raising the minimum wage, but if they do then it should only be enough to adjust for inflation.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom