• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Dallas Shooter

No pressure cookers are not designed for mass murder: ARs and AKs and SIGs are. THAT is the topic.

You are diverting into a non sequitur: "well, we should ban this and this and this". We're not talking about those things and I refuse to because they are off topic.

Now if you can't credibly show cause, that absolutely refute Scalia's words in Heller that second amendment IS limited, the former federal ban on assault weapons, the current state's bans on assault weapons under the 10th amendment, which like the former federal ban are legal and currently enforced and why said assault weapons are NOT military design made for mass killing, then we're done. I refuse go around the Maypole with you.

mass murder-the lies continue

then you change to mass killing-another lie

its hilarious how many lies you tell and you act as if no one realizes they are lies

civilian legal rifles are designed for legitimate shooting activities
 
Assault rifles are selective fire, they have not been used in any of the recent mass shootings.

This is why the gun control movement fails, because those who want to ban guns don't know a thing about them.


The Bannerrhoid movement is NOT

1) motivated by an understanding of firearms

2) crime patterns and criminal behavior

but rather

a political agenda and hatred of conservatives and the NRA

that hatred is not due to any information about firearms

but rather the voting patterns of pro gun voters
 
The good news is that you can also use these weapons to fire back at somebody using one to kill a lot of people. You see, the problem isn't the weapon. The difference is who is using it and what their purpose is.

Exactly right.

Used a gun similar to those used in recent mass shootings.]

He killed FIVE police officers.

How many of these weapons wouldn't be in circulation if the assault weapons ban hadn't been allowed to expire twenty years ago?

Reagan's rolling in his grave.


He could have killed just as many with any number of semi-automatic, non-military 'style' weapons.

It's not the gun...it's the nut using the gun.

Yep! Why can't these liberals figures this out?

Yep, you're absolutely right. We will also note that the shooter was a veteran (american hero), and that he was a law abiding citizen, who took advantage of his ability to own an assault weapon in case the government comes for his guns...

So, what could go wrong!?!

Yes, he was all legal......and what you are avoiding talking about are the explosives.

The perp had a lot of explosives at his house, was making more and was planning an even bigger incident. For some reason, he upped his time table.

Now would you be bitching about how the Congress should toughen the laws on personal explosives, like your misguided attempt on guns, if he had employed those explosives and killed hundreds??

The San Berdoo Two also had a lot of explosives and were making more...

The thing is, you wouldn't even be talking about the weapon used if they used bombs!!!! Looks like bomb making material is a lot easier to acquire than guns!

Well, the bad news is all those cops had AR15s and nobody could get'em. Now we have 5 more dead cops on or hands and 9 wounded people.

So, you are saying that the cops couldn't shoot worth a damn even with EQUAL firepower?
 
Last edited:
Assault rifles are selective fire, they have not been used in any of the recent mass shootings.

This is why the gun control movement fails, because those who want to ban guns don't know a thing about them.

Big Truth there! :thumbs:
 
mass murder-the lies continue

then you change to mass killing-another lie

its hilarious how many lies you tell and you act as if no one realizes they are lies

civilian legal rifles are designed for legitimate shooting activities

Truth as opposed to all the lies told by jet.

The Bannerrhoid movement is NOT

1) motivated by an understanding of firearms

2) crime patterns and criminal behavior

but rather

a political agenda and hatred of conservatives and the NRA

that hatred is not due to any information about firearms

but rather the voting patterns of pro gun voters

In a nutshell.
 
You just shot yourself in the foot.

They qualify.

No, my foot is intact. You simply keep providing proof that your dishonesty knows no boundaries.

Why didn't you link the whole sentence instead of cherry picking just a few words?

"A rifle that has a detachable magazine and is capable of both automatic and semiautomatic fire, designed for individual use in combat. "
 
Back
Top Bottom