• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Controversial Reason Girl’s American Flag Photo Banned From Yearbook

Was the banning of this photo from the yearbook appropriate?

  • Total voters
    20
And yet I doubt the school has the power to ban a student from burning said flag. This could have been handled much better by simply speaking with the student and the parents and expressing their concerns. Heck, they could have captioned the photo explaining it was a backdrop photo and that she wasn't standing on the flag.
 
I'm not comfortable with the backdrop being on the ground or even being stood upon, even though it's not an actual flag. But, it's not an actual flag, that's just it.

What I really don't get is why the local veteran's group objected to the feet being cropped out. I see no issue with that whatsoever, especially since it wasn't an actual flag. I'd like to hear the veteran's group's rationale on this.

In the end I came down on the "it's an overreaction" side. It should have been allowed to go forward, especially after the offer to crop. At that point it could have been an actual flag on the wall a foot off the ground, and (supposedly) no one would have objected.
 
clownboy said:
And yet I doubt the school has the power to ban a student from burning said flag.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the school has the power to prevent her from putting a picture of her burning said flag in the yearbook.
 
I really couldn't care less. I don't understand all the flag-worship crap anyway. It's just a hunk of cloth.
 
If the given reason is the real reason, it's a good reason. She needs to submit a respectful American flag photo and see how the school reacts.
 
radcen said:
Was the banning of this photo from the yearbook appropriate? Or, did the school overreact?
Click to expand...

Do schools now have a vice principal in charge of faux outrage? It seems like we get at least one of these stories daily, from kids chewing their pop tarts into guns up to censoring a Charlie Brown Christmas play. At the same time permitting Johnny to use the girls facilities.

Per the OP, the student's employer was willing to pay for an ad recognizing an outstanding employee/student, and instead found themselves in the middle of a bogus controversy. PC is out of control.
 

Foolish people concerned about foolish things. :doh
 
I might steal that.
 
molten_dragon said:
I really couldn't care less. I don't understand all the flag-worship crap anyway. It's just a hunk of cloth.
Click to expand...

I agree completely.

They could urinate on, defecate on and then burn all the flags of the world for all I care.

They mean virtually NOTHING to me...they are just flags for 'f's sake.
 
The girl and her family learned one last lesson from the school authorities, namely, that many Americans died for freedom of speech which is not honored by some Americans.
 
Heinrich said:
The girl and her family learned one last lesson from the school authorities, namely, that many Americans died for freedom of speech which is not honored by some Americans.
Click to expand...

Um, this is not a free speech issue. The school is paying for the yearbook; ergo, it has final say over content.


"PC"! Everybody drink!
 
Kobie said:
Pretty sure the school has the power to prevent her from putting a picture of her burning said flag in the yearbook.
Click to expand...

When I was in school, the administration had to approve the entire yearbook, pictures and all, before it went to press. Hence all the cutesy code that older folks don't recognize as inside or off color jokes, insulting nicknames, etc. In my day, we weren't very clever with our "hidden rebellions", but with the new language of the internet and techie stuff, administrators would have to run every danged "word" through the Urban Dictionary!

A picture of a burning flag, regardless the context, would be a no-brainer no-no.
 
Kobie said:
Um, this is not a free speech issue. The school is paying for the yearbook; ergo, it has final say over content. ...
Click to expand...
Of course, in America it is money which talks.
 
Heinrich said:
Of course, in America it is money which talks.
Click to expand...
You seriously need to step away from the computer for a few years and go experience the world. You seem to have this notion that only America has all the bad habits. Truth is, all these bad habits are human traits. Pretty much every society suffers from them, the only difference being exposure and maybe scale.
 
radcen said:
Was the banning of this photo from the yearbook appropriate? Or, did the school overreact?
Click to expand...

If she was my kid...I'd be suing the hell out of the school district. My suit would include doing a reprint of every single year book that was issued to students...at the district's expense.
 
They should have cropped out her fake ripped jeans. Cropping her feet still shows the flag touching the floor. Piss-poor taste IYAM.
 
In the photo as reproduced on the website linked to, I don't see any wall, any floor, or any indication that the soles of the girl's feet are touching what seems to be an image of the U.S. flag. But I DO notice that the school official who referred to a wall, floor, etc. has a hyphenated last name. Maybe she is English royalty of some kind.
 
Says someone who does not know a First Amendment issue when he sees it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…