- Joined
- Oct 1, 2005
- Messages
- 38,750
- Reaction score
- 13,845
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Re: The Conservative Media Echo Chamber Is Making the Right Intellectually Deaf
They, in fact, were.
And it still comes again and again, every time they attack what they refer to as "anti-gay legislation," whether or not it actually IS anti-gay. Psssst: that in itself is part of the fear-mongering.
I know you think this means something, possibly even clever, but it doesn't.
Yes, look at it.
No. I'm not. Especially not in the context in which it was posted.
You see it that way because you want to. Because you are fundamentally dishonest. Because you apparently enjoy pretending people said things they didn't.
You do it every single time.
Yet, you still read it in.
You did not "reduce it to the absurd."
This is not the first time I've seen you pooch the entire concept of reductio ad absurdum. You really don't know what it means. I know you think you do. You don't.
They were not made by mainstream people on the left.
They, in fact, were.
And it still comes again and again, every time they attack what they refer to as "anti-gay legislation," whether or not it actually IS anti-gay. Psssst: that in itself is part of the fear-mongering.
You are actually criticizing your own strawman, not left wing politics. That's why this is so ironic--
I know you think this means something, possibly even clever, but it doesn't.
Look at your quote:
Yes, look at it.
By specifying "on the Left" you are, indeed, implying that this phenomenon is unique to the left.
No. I'm not. Especially not in the context in which it was posted.
You see it that way because you want to. Because you are fundamentally dishonest. Because you apparently enjoy pretending people said things they didn't.
You do it every single time.
And you'll note that i prefaced my comment with "if you think that..."- i was very clearly leaving room for doubt.
Yet, you still read it in.
Either you did believe that, and if so i reduced it to the absurd, or you didn't believe that, and you agree with me.
You did not "reduce it to the absurd."
This is not the first time I've seen you pooch the entire concept of reductio ad absurdum. You really don't know what it means. I know you think you do. You don't.