• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Case for Blaming Obama[W:37]

Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Fortunately nobody but the tea party freaks believes this nonsense and where this is heading -- a default on US obligation, which is what the freaks want -- will ultimately result in the tea partiers and many other Republican shills being removed from office. It's the only solution and Americans are finally realizing that.

Impeachment or recall, take your pick. It's the future for the freaks of the tea party occupation forces.

Spoken like a true Marxist.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

I don't remember the Democratic Senate leader taking the podium the day Reagan was inaugurated and claiming that the Dems' entire legislative goal was to make Reagan a one-term president, and then that party doing everything in their power (and failing) to make that a reality. It was a different time back then.

That's probably because the car you were conceived in wasn't manufactured yet.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

The President of the USA didn't have to deal with a House of Representatives controlled by some people who refuse to accept the fact that the man in the White House won the election last November.

It's hard to talk with people who refuse to accept reality.
]



That's one way to put it it. Another is that the man in the White House refuses to accept the reality that voters elected more Republicans than Democrats to the House of Representatives, which is part of the 3 branches of Gov't. These people are bound to their constituents, are they not? It's hard to talk to a man who who refuses to accept reality.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

That argument is getting old Shrub.

There are three branches of government. It's Congress who writes the laws and appropriates the money, not Obama.

Obama's job is not to dictate through executive order but to enforce those laws passed by Congress and to over see those departments of government spend the money that Congress has appropriated as it's suppose to be.

Obama has been derelict as POTUS. He has refused to uphold the oath of office that he had to take twice in 2013. He has ignored what parts of the Constitution that he doesn't like. And worse of all, nobody is in charge, Obama has surrounded himself with second rate people.

Heya Apache. :2wave: Whats Obama's excuse for traveling around the Country with a Government shutdown. Knowing the Cost of Security for himself and that for the place he visits. See even here with a shutdown. Obama will find a way to get out into the public. To waste and spend money.

He should be trying to work something out and not take the Stance of the Syrian Rebels, and flat out refusing to negotiate. Saying its this way or no way. Specially since he was caught in his lies and gave all his buddies those breaks they needed.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Heya Apache. :2wave: Whats Obama's excuse for traveling around the Country with a Government shutdown. Knowing the Cost of Security for himself and that for the place he visits. See even here with a shutdown. Obama will find a way to get out into the public. To waste and spend money.

He should be trying to work something out and not take the Stance of the Syrian Rebels, and flat out refusing to negotiate. Saying its this way or no way. Specially since he was caught in his lies and gave all his buddies those breaks they needed.

Come on now, just yesterday Obama spet an entire hour to deal with Harry Reids shut down of government.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Come on now, just yesterday Obama spet an entire hour to deal with Harry Reids shut down of government.

Well, he did cancel two stops overseas but still went on with 2 others.....so he got in some party time. Few pics for the camera and whatnot.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

BWHAHHAHAHA
HHH!. The guy who gave us 9-11 by supporting jihadist in Afghanistan was successful.

Wow thats a reach.

No HOJ, if you want to know why those 19 hijackers....( from Saudi) were able to do what they did look no further than Clinton and Jamie Gorelick....aka ( The Gorelick wall).

I cant walk you through the truth ALL the time so you're going to have to pick up and fly right eventually.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

I feel compelled to point out that the first U.S. government shutdown was in 1976.

We made it for 200 years without having to do this, so it's not exactly an ancient U.S. tradition. The 1980's only seem like a long time ago.

<Link>
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Wow thats a reach.

No HOJ, if you want to know why those 19 hijackers....( from Saudi) were able to do what they did look no further than Clinton and Jamie Gorelick....aka ( The Gorelick wall).

I cant walk you through the truth ALL the time so you're going to have to pick up and fly right eventually.

Reagan supported Bin Ladin in Afghanstan, being fixated on Sovietphobia (kind of like you with Obamaphobia).

Phobias lead to stupid policy decisions, in Reagan's case, supporting jihadists who carried out 9-11. In your cause, defaulting on US obligations that will result in another recession.

I see a pattern forming among irrational conservatives.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

I don't remember the Democratic Senate leader taking the podium the day Reagan was inaugurated and claiming that the Dems' entire legislative goal was to make Reagan a one-term president, and then that party doing everything in their power (and failing) to make that a reality. It was a different time back then.

That was because the Democrats shut out Republicans in development of the stimulus plan and was planning to pass healthcare, climate taxes, and financial reform without any bipartisanship, mind you. Context is a bitch sometimes.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Moderator's Warning:
There is some baiting, derailing and personal comments going on. Stick to the topic.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Wow thats a reach.

No HOJ, if you want to know why those 19 hijackers....( from Saudi) were able to do what they did look no further than Clinton and Jamie Gorelick....aka ( The Gorelick wall).

I cant walk you through the truth ALL the time so you're going to have to pick up and fly right eventually.

Right, it was Clinton who funded them because they were trying to kick the Commies out of their homeland.

Oh no, wait, that was Ronald Reagan.

If Reagan had never been President, the Berlin Wall would still have fallen, and the World Trade Center would not have.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

That was because the Democrats shut out Republicans in development of the stimulus plan and was planning to pass healthcare, climate taxes, and financial reform without any bipartisanship, mind you. Context is a bitch sometimes.

Bull. The Republicans shut themselves out of it all, because they didn't want to help the black liberal get credit for anything, and thus get re-elected. McConnell said it at the beginning: Their goal was to make Obama a one-term President. How did that work out, by the way?
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Bull. The Republicans shut themselves out of it all, because they didn't want to help the black liberal get credit for anything, and thus get re-elected. McConnell said it at the beginning: Their goal was to make Obama a one-term President. How did that work out, by the way?

Once again, context. It was in response to being shut out of the negotiation room.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Right, it was Clinton who funded them because they were trying to kick the Commies out of their homeland.

Oh no, wait, that was Ronald Reagan.

If Reagan had never been President, the Berlin Wall would still have fallen, and the World Trade Center would not have.

The Reagan Lore promoted by the right is lush, isn't it? The man supported virtually every criminal organization on the planet, and yet here they are pointing to him as a "successful" president that Obama failed to live up to. Weird.
 
Reagan
supported Bin Ladin in Afghanstan, being fixated on Sovietphobia (kind of like you with Obamaphobia).

Phobias lead to stupid policy decisions, in Reagan's case, supporting jihadists who carried out 9-11. In your cause, defaulting on US obligations that will result in another recession.

I see a pattern forming among irrational conservatives.

LOL !!!

Yea, what a reach.

How about you focus on why 9/11 REALLY happened.

Jamie Gorelick covering Clintons ass via her " Gorelick Wall " and Clintons repayment for her favor by appointing her to be the vice chair at Fannie Mae.

You remember Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dont you ?

Stocked full of corrupt Democrats by a Corrupt Democrat and the only two financial entites to be charged with securities fraud after the 2008 collapse.
 
LOL !!!

Yea, what a reach.

How about you focus on why 9/11 REALLY happened.

Jamie Gorelick covering Clintons ass via her " Gorelick Wall " and Clintons repayment for her favor by appointing her to be the vice chair at Fannie Mae.

You remember Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dont you ?

Stocked full of corrupt Democrats by a Corrupt Democrat and the only two financial entites to be charged with securities fraud after the 2008 collapse.
Yes, because, as we all know, 9/11 and the 2008 crash are completely related.

Actually, no, they aren't. They are connected by one thing: A stupid right-wing President allowed both to happen.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

The fact that the Tea Party - who represent the views of the majority of Americans- is considered 'radical' speaks to just how far left this country has gone.
And the fact that the Tea Party is viewed as a fringe group by so many speaks to the fact that they do not in fact represent the views of the majority of Americans. In reality, they're a minority within a party that can't even lay claim to that mantle.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

Bull. The Republicans shut themselves out of it all, because they didn't want to help the black liberal....blah blah blah way?

Groaaaaaaaaan. The race card. So predictable. And just so old and tired. The left just wants to stay stuck in the 60's. same old tired ideas . Same old tired rhetoric.
Big government is great, tax the rich more, racism racism racism. Broken frigging record.
 
Re: The Case for Blaming Obama

And the fact that the Tea Party is viewed as a fringe group by so many speaks to the fact that they do not in fact represent the views of the majority of .
Sure they do.
You've been watching too much MSNBC.
Welcome to Forbes

Still true.
 
LOL !!!

Yea, what a reach.

How about you focus on why 9/11 REALLY happened.

Jamie Gorelick covering Clintons ass via her " Gorelick Wall " and Clintons repayment for her favor by appointing her to be the vice chair at Fannie Mae.

You remember Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac dont you ?

Stocked full of corrupt Democrats by a Corrupt Democrat and the only two financial entites to be charged with securities fraud after the 2008 collapse.

Oh dear God this meme.

Reagan called Bin Laden the equivalent of our founding fathers. That sort of ends the debate.
 
Back
Top Bottom