- Joined
- Sep 9, 2011
- Messages
- 13,745
- Reaction score
- 8,546
- Location
- North 38°28′ West 121°26′
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Exactly. A 40 year old man left brain dead from an automobile accident wouldn't qualify as a "rational moral agent." Does that mean we are free to abuse his body? Execute him? Conduct experiments on him? And just how does a newborn qualify as a "rational moral agent?" I guess we are free to wipe out children all the way up to the age of 9 or 10 then.
It is the position of theleftwrong here that lacks both rationality and morality.
Fixed it for you. Contrary to popular misconception, the opposite of “right” where political ideology is concerned is not “left”; the opposite of “right” is “wrong”. Surely the issue that is the subject of this thread, more than most, demonstrates this point. This is truly an issue of good/right against evil/wrong—a side that values and seeks to defend the most innocent and defenseless of all human beings against the side which seeks to kill them.