• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The 4 divisions of the US government.

Not my party. I'm conservative, not Republican.

Given a choice, I'd vote them all out.

The "Republican" party doesn't exist anymore. There's the Trump Party, and everyone else.
 
Congress seems determined to empower Mueller with authority to run roughshod over Congress, the President, the courts and the American people. Congress seems determined to give Mueller immunity from investigation or prosecution for his own mishandlings in the case, as well as an unlimited time frame that could extend into decades.

Mueller has been on the case for less time than Gowdy investigated Hillary Clinton regarding Benghazi which ran from 2014 to 2016. The tables have turned with Republicans doing the criticizing. And there are, of course, significant differences: The Benghazi Select Committee investigation was a congressional probe, while Mueller is a Justice Department-appointed special counsel who is leading a criminal investigation.

Chairman of that committee Trey Gowdy literally spent years and years investigating Hillary Clinton as part of the GOP's eight-committee investigation of Benghazi, which resulted in nothing but a deluge of false Republican allegations that helped get Donald Trump elected President. The Mueller has already landed indictments and guilty pleas from several senior members of the Trump campaign and more indictments are coming very soon. The fact is that his investigation is winding down and now we're all going to see exactly why Robert Mueller is so esteemed by colleagues.
 
Mueller has been on the case for less time than Gowdy investigated Hillary Clinton regarding Benghazi which ran from 2014 to 2016. The tables have turned with Republicans doing the criticizing. And there are, of course, significant differences: The Benghazi Select Committee investigation was a congressional probe, while Mueller is a Justice Department-appointed special counsel who is leading a criminal investigation.

Chairman of that committee Trey Gowdy literally spent years and years investigating Hillary Clinton as part of the GOP's eight-committee investigation of Benghazi, which resulted in nothing but a deluge of false Republican allegations that helped get Donald Trump elected President. The Mueller has already landed indictments and guilty pleas from several senior members of the Trump campaign and more indictments are coming very soon. The fact is that his investigation is winding down and now we're all going to see exactly why Robert Mueller is so esteemed by colleagues.

Democrats have a lot to brag about. They successfully resisted investigations into the Benghazi affair as well as Hillary's Nixonian destruction of evidence subpoenaed by Congress. They look like they are winning but they are not. Trump did not collude with Russia like the democrats claimed after they shot and killed Seth Rich for giving Assange the DNC emails.
 
The "Republican" party doesn't exist anymore. There's the Trump Party, and everyone else.

I you are a little confused. I checked just just this morning. Found a Republican party, a Democrat party, and a few independent parties listed. Repubs still there. No mention of a Trump party. If there is, I'm not part of it.
 
Democrats have a lot to brag about. They successfully resisted investigations into the Benghazi affair as well as Hillary's Nixonian destruction of evidence subpoenaed by Congress. They look like they are winning but they are not. Trump did not collude with Russia like the democrats claimed after they shot and killed Seth Rich for giving Assange the DNC emails.

No, but his kid surely did and Trump is not going to like waving 'bye bye' to his kid as he heads off to prison. "I love it" The Seth Rich conspiracy theory has been proven to be nothing more than that and even his parents had to threaten a lawsuit against Alex Jones and Sean Hannity to make them stop pushing that false story about his death.
 
No, but his kid surely did and Trump is not going to like waving 'bye bye' to his kid as he heads off to prison. "I love it" The Seth Rich conspiracy theory has been proven to be nothing more than that and even his parents had to threaten a lawsuit against Alex Jones and Sean Hannity to make them stop pushing that false story about his death.

Nobody has successfully investigated the Seth Rich murder in democrat DC so democrats falsely claim that he was not killed by vengeful democrats for releasing DNC emails. The FBI, controlled by biased Hillary supporters, also did not look into in DNC computers for evidence related to the release of the DNC emails from those computers.
 
Nobody has successfully investigated the Seth Rich murder in democrat DC so democrats falsely claim that he was not killed by vengeful democrats for releasing DNC emails. The FBI, controlled by biased Hillary supporters, also did not look into in DNC computers for evidence related to the release of the DNC emails from those computers.
Why do you think Trump is helping the Democrats/Illuminati/Jews/whatever hide this murder?
 
I you are a little confused. I checked just just this morning. Found a Republican party, a Democrat party, and a few independent parties listed. Repubs still there. No mention of a Trump party. If there is, I'm not part of it.

The Republican party, still named that, no longer believes in anything except the divinity of Trump. People who have been Republicans longer than Trump have been run off and are no longer welcome there (see Flake and Ryan).

Your little word game notwithstanding. But yeah, you're soooooo smart. Cute.
 
Nobody has successfully investigated the Seth Rich murder in democrat DC so democrats falsely claim that he was not killed by vengeful democrats for releasing DNC emails. The FBI, controlled by biased Hillary supporters, also did not look into in DNC computers for evidence related to the release of the DNC emails from those computers.

So the Democrats "falsely" claim they didn't have him killed? Lets see the proof. You clearly have evidence nobody else does, so lets see it.
 
Nobody has successfully investigated the Seth Rich murder in democrat DC so democrats falsely claim that he was not killed by vengeful democrats for releasing DNC emails. The FBI, controlled by biased Hillary supporters, also did not look into in DNC computers for evidence related to the release of the DNC emails from those computers.

What do you consider a 'successful' investigation? Would successful to you only mean that there was some sinister plot by the Democrats to murder him? Or, would successful mean that there was a complete and thorough investigation that showed that this was a random murder? The timing of the murder and the fact that he had worked for a political party instantly raised eyebrows and multiple conspiracy theories which were based on little or no evidence, began in the corners of the internet on obscure websites and blogs, and spread rapidly to Reddit, Facebook and Twitter.

Eventually some of them made it into mainstream news, and were seized upon by Trump supporters to aid their own political ends. And it started with a single post on Twitter. A Bernie Sanders-supporting Twitter account connected the murder with a lawsuit filed by Sanders supporters against the DNC. The conspiracies really began to take root on the online message board Reddit where links to local news stories about Seth's murder were posted, suggesting Seth was killed for leaking DNC emails. The theories then spread from Reddit and the anonymous 4Chan message board, to Twitter and Facebook. The growing conspiracy theories received a further boost when Julian Assange appeared on Dutch TV and strongly implied that Seth had been the whistleblower behind the email leak!

Soon afterwards, Wikileaks posted a tweet offering a cash reward for anyone who could help solve the murder. Many people interpreted that as an implicit confirmation that Seth Rich had been their source. In reality, nobody knows to this day if this was the case. Assange has consistently refused to confirm or deny that Seth - or anyone else - was the organization's source. Of course now we know that Julian Assange was directly working with Russian's Guccifer 2.0 in obtaining and passing on hacked emails of Hillary Clinton.

The case gathered pace after it emerged that wealthy Republican donor Ed Butowsky had hired private investigator Rod Wheeler to investigate.
Wheeler was also a Fox News contributor and former police detective. His findings appeared on the Fox News website and one of its main presenters, Sean Hannity, turned his attention to the story. Hannity used his Twitter feed to demand a Congressional investigation.

As anyone with half a brain can see, the right was using the unfortunate murder of Seth Rich as a political weapon, and that's absolutely disgusting. The Seth Rich case shows how social media can push conspiracies from the fringes into the mainstream. Seth Rich's family have launched legal action against Fox. Seth Rich's mother Mary Rich told the US TV show Good Morning America: "They never called us to check any facts. They took a rumor and ran with it. "We lost his body the first time, and the second time we lost his soul," she said.

To perpetuate this conspiracy theory is just wrong.
 
Why do you think Trump is helping the Democrats/Illuminati/Jews/whatever hide this murder?

Just because Trump is not solving every crime every democrat has ever committed does not mean he is helping them evade justice.
 
So the Democrats "falsely" claim they didn't have him killed? Lets see the proof. You clearly have evidence nobody else does, so lets see it.

Democrats claim the Seth Rich murder was not a conspiracy. How do they know that, especially since they have no interest in finding out who did murder Rich? They don't know. They just spin news stories to fit their biased narrative and blind democrat propaganda.
 
What do you consider a 'successful' investigation?

An investigation that doggedly pursues leads until the culprit is caught. The Seth Rich investigation has made the DC cops look like bumbling Keystone cop imbeciles.
 
Democrats claim the Seth Rich murder was not a conspiracy. How do they know that, especially since they have no interest in finding out who did murder Rich? They don't know. They just spin news stories to fit their biased narrative and blind democrat propaganda.

That's your evidence :lamo
 
That's your evidence :lamo

What kind of real investigation keeps evidence hidden from the public and never gets anywhere? In investigation into major crimes with ties to democrat corruption in America.
 
What kind of real investigation keeps evidence hidden from the public and never gets anywhere? In investigation into major crimes with ties to democrat corruption in America.

So you have zero evidence. As expected.
 
Back
Top Bottom