• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ten trends of the world

maisinwin

Banned
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
(This is my updated edition)
overview:
1, all kinds of religions will disappear.
2, marriages and families will disappear.
3, moral systems and pension systems will disappear.
4, power of tall males and strong males will decline greatly.
5, wisdomism will replace capitalism.
6, English will be greatly simplified.
7, disorderly calendar, clock sequences and the "QWERTY" keyboard will be improved.
8, most teaching activities will be done at internet schools.
9, the physical laws that can explain all of forces will bring science revolution and molecular foods will bring technology revolution.
10, the earth federation will appear.

1, all kinds of religions will disappear.
All kinds of religions are false heresies and the only difference between them is falseness degree.
What is the world made up of? All living beings and inanimate objects are made up of elementary particles. Differences between any two objects or between any two persons or between any one object and one person, are different quantities and different spatial structure of the elementary particles that they respectively contain, namely differences of mathematics sense. For example, President Obama, Bin Laden, elephant, ant, tree, grass, nuclear weapon and air seem like completely different, but the only differences between them are different quantities and different spatial structure of nucleons and electrons that they respectively contain. So the world is completely made up of substances, and alleged soul in any religion does not exist. All of our mental states and mental activities attribute to ever-changing physical and chemical reactions in our bodies. Chemistry and biology are both sub-disciplines of physics, so all of questions about mental states and mental activities, about individuals and society, about philosophy and psychics can be explained and computed by physics and mathematics in future.
Dynamic balance between gather and diffusion of elementary particles is the fundamental law of all phenomena in the whole universe. So there are only three kinds of phenomena in the whole universe: from less quantities to more quantities, balance, from more quantities to less quantities. The chemical expression of the fundamental law is dynamic balance between synthesis reactions and decomposition reactions. Every object, every plant, and everybody has three processes from birth to death: the growing process dominated by synthesis reactions, balanced process, the dying process dominated by decomposition reactions. Everyone's body is controlled by brain and everyone's emotions are controlled by some of the most important substances in brain. When synthesis reactions of these substances in brain surpass decomposition reactions of them, we feel pleased; when the synthesis reactions equal to the decomposition reactions, we feel balanced, i.e. we feel nothing; when the decomposition reactions surpass the synthesis reactions, we feel painful. Everyone has many different periods in one's whole life. In some times, our gross pleasures surpass our gross pains; in some another times, our gross pleasures roughly equal to our gross pains; in some other times, our gross pains surpass our gross pleasures. When the universe (mainly the sun) gives humans the environment where synthetic reactions of lives surpass decomposition reactions of lives, pleasure gross of all mankind surpass pain gross of all mankind, and property of human competitions is positive-sum. When the universe gives humans balanced environment, property of human competitions is zero-sum. When the universe gives humans the environment where decomposition of lives surpass synthesis of lives, pain gross of all mankind surpass pleasure gross, and property of human competitions is negative-sum, and populations on the earth reduce, and humans even possibly die out. Humans on the earth always switch between these three phases. Since humans appeared on the earth long long ago, humans have been being in the first phase more often than humans have in the third phase, so that populations on the earth have been increasing. But in future, humans will be in the third phase more often than humans be in the first phase, so that populations on the earth will greatly reduce and then humans will die out or immigrate into other celestial body. Human is absolutely the most complex, the greatest and the smartest object in the whole solar system, so we are fully qualified to despise anything else of the solar system on the quality sense. But on the quantity sense, everyone of us is tiny in the huge solar system. So, when we sit on a boat that sails on the huge Pacific Ocean, we will feel human is tiny; when astronauts travel in the outer space, they will feel human is tiny; a common stockholder is tiny in the whole stock market so he isn't able to predict and control the stock movements. All of the above cases are not on account of that the Pacific Ocean, the outer space and the stock market are controlled by the god, but on account of that we are tiny on the quantities sense. No one can completely control one's destiny, which doesn't mean that the god controls human destiny. In fact, powerful and ever-changing environments make human destiny ever-changing.
Nobody has really seen the alleged god, so missionaries are closest to the god. But missionaries are not able to predict anything or solve any practical problem. They can only lead the believers to read the Bible. If the god controlled the whole world, why are the missionaries who are closest to the god so incapable? But meteorological engineers have real ability to predict weather, and doctors have real ability to help us to remove the pains of many diseases, and electronic engineers have real ability to invent mobile phones and computers......
So the god doesn't exist and all of religions are illusory.

2, marriages and families will disappear.
Marriages are based on mutual loves, and loves are based on mutually meeting one's lover's needs. But our needs change constantly with time and space because everyone is always in ever-changing environments. And we can't always keep up with dynamic needs of our lovers. So love is easy to deteriorate, or other, love is like a kind of liquid with volatileness. Every kind of love can volatilize away from us by little and little. But we can get new loves again after old loves volatilize away, so it's easy for us to get love and lose love. Some babyish people like asking their lovers:"do you really love me?". In fact, all loves are real and difference between all kinds of loves is different shelf life or different volatileness. So marriages are fragile. There will be more and more extramarital loves and divorces until all of marriages collapse thoroughly.
And existence of family seriously hinder optimal allocation of resources. Some clever children live in bad families but some foolish children live in good families. Poorness, quarrel, fight, divorce and death of parents hinder development of children; and children's trouble can also strike lives and work of parents. In short, family is baggage of both parents and children. Giving up family will liberate both parents and children, and will improve society efficiency greatly.
So lovers will couple to be dynamic and temporary couples according to their dynamic needs. We will give up all marriages and families, and build the free society completely based on individuals. Current interpersonal relationship is just like time-consuming dinners, but future interpersonal relationship will be like brief snacks. The society without marriage and family can run as follow:
(1) Temporary couples give their babies to government. Then the parents will be not the sociological parents any longer but the biological parents of the babies. There will be not any of direct rights and obligation between parents and children.
(2) Government should tax all of employed people to establish some special places for fostering and educating children at main populated areas, and hire some professional nurses and teachers. The babies with inborn serious defects should be euthanized and all of other babies will get fitting education.
(3) All children will be adopted by government so we don't know who are our parents and who are our children in our whole life. And all of us have no obligation to support our retired parents. So that women will not volunteer giving birth to children. Government should reward all of puerperae to enable their fertility to match population need of society, i.e. government should carry out population planning by economic ways.
But younger generations are both partners and competitors for older generations so government should scientifically calculate population need of society.

3, moral systems and pension systems will disappear.
There are only three kinds of phenomena in human society: growth of life, balance of life, decline of life. So human society is always a cruel battlefield, and everyone rely on one's luck and ability to compete with others for survival rights. Some weak youths and mid adults have been marginalized by society. They sleep out on the streets, or suicide, or commit crimes to resist their destinies. Some of them have to rely on drugs to ease their pressure. On the other hand, a large number of unemployed elderly survive relying on pensions or sons or daughters. So weak youths and mid adults lose out to unemployed elderly in survival wars.
But current society is information society with well-developed internet, communication and traffic, so lots of wisdom and power flow at unprecedented speed all over the world. So many marginalized youths and mid adults have unprecedented power to resist and retaliate other people. They have the intensest criminal motive and the strongest criminal ability. Almost all of bombings and shootings incidents were made by weak youths and mid adults who was defined as "evil people". And there will be more and more criminal activities and terrorist activities in future, so it will be more and more difficult and costly for the alleged just people to defeat the alleged evil people.
When social costs of criminal and terrorist activities exceed the critical point, most of people will understand that any morality is nothing in survival wars. Human nature of everyone is to avoid pains, seek balance and pleasures. Human nature of anyone is not good or bad but neutral. The same human nature and different situations bring up different individuals. There are not just or evil people but lucky or unlucky people in the world.
These old people without any value are non-recyclable human resources just like the end-of-life vehicles without potential value. But most of weak youths and mid adults are recyclable human resources with potential value. Many useless old people occupy many resources, so all of other people are situated in vicious survival wars and some of them are marginalized and have to "evilly" commit crimes. Besides, the will of women to bear a child will be weaker and weaker, and the problem of population aging will be more and more serious. Youths and mid adults will refuse to feed the unemployed elderly without any value. So the pension system will go bankruptcy.
Everyone should work until one is near to death. The people who work until the age of 98 and die at the age of 100 are human models. But the people who work until the age of 65 and die at the age of 100 are insect pests of society. All of the old people unemployed for a long time, such as two years, will have to accept euthanasia and all of their asset will be taken over by government. So governments should immediately stop levying pensions from employees and partly return pensions which people have payed.
The disabled people unemployed for a long time, the youths and mid adults with incurable disease will also be given up in future. Everyone living on the earth must have obvious social value or potential social value, which will be survival law on the earth.
Maintaining 5%~10% of unemployment rate is necessary for stimulating all of the employed people. After abolishing heavy pension system, governments will be able to provide these unemployed people with basic life guarantee, basic medical insurance and vocational training. Most of people will be no longer sore loser, so there will be more of healthy competitions and less of vicious competitions in future. There are too many of vicious competitions in current society so that many youths and mid adults rely on drug, robbery, murder or other radical ways to resist survival pressures. In the future society, all drugs may be freely traded but drug won't overflow.
Will the elderly facing euthanasia replace youths and mid adults to make terrorist attacks in the future? Crime motive and criminal ability of the elderly eliminated by nature laws will be far weaker than ability of youths and mid adults. So future society will be safer.
 
4, power of tall males and strong males will decline greatly.
The heavy males (including tall males and strong males) are generally the strong now. Females and light males (short and thin males) are generally the weak now. But the world is always ever-changing, it's absolutely impossible that heavy males will be the strong forever. The weak always do their best to challenge the strong, which is the main driving force of human developments. But if females and light males want to become the strong, they must first understand why they are the weak of society now. The root cause is that they have no sufficient ability to defend their bodies and property.
Without such ability, females always dare not be alone in out-of-the-way places, dare not touch dirty things and dare not face burning sun and so on, in order to avoid violations from males, and to maintain their beauty to please males. So females can only live cowardly and passively like vegetables in greenhouse, and they never have the opportunity to make their potential give full play. Plight of light males is similar to female plight. In a word, females and light males have too many restricted zones delimited by heavy males. But heavy males can always follow their inclinations to explore and try all kinds of things. Not gene but more opportunities make heavy males smarter and more capable than others are. And property of females and light males is often plundered by some of heavy males such as rogues.
Females and light males have no strong limbs and therefore have no sufficient ability to defend their bodies and property. So limbs force is the only source of all advantages of heavy males. Defeating limbs force and having sufficient self-defense ability is prerequisite for females and light males to become the strong. Females and light males should not childishly fantasy that heavy males will give up limbs violence, and that policemen and bodyguards will give them sufficient protection. They must rely on themselves and arm themselves with powerful technological equipments to defeat limbs violence.
How can they arm themselves? The only way is to own powerful protective suits. Guns help the weak to increase sense of safety and get more social power, so the females with guns in western nations generally own more social power than the females without guns in eastern nations do. But guns can't give them sufficient self-defense ability, for example, the people with guns are not able to prevent near attacks and the attacks behind their bodies, and they dare not easily use deadly guns.
Engineers should develop a kind of protective suits that can protect the whole body of the weak. This kind of protective suits must be able to resist limbs violence, metal knife and blunt, hotness and coldness. There must be rearview mirror and night-vision device on this kind of suits. Wearing such suits, the weak will get protection of 360 degrees. As we put on protective suits, we can set up a password to block others from maliciously taking off our suits. The people wearing such suits will be like astronauts or robots. Once more, the governments should strictly prohibit all of the people except policemen and armymen from owning the offensive weapons, such as guns, which could make our protective suits lose efficacy. Should we give up guns? Wearing such protective suits, we won't need guns to defend us.
Is this feasible? Price of protective suits is a problem but the price will be acceptable for most people by development of science and technology. The social cost of designing, manufacturing and using such protective suits will be less than the social cost of female cosmetics and breast enhancement products etc.
Will it make inconveniences to wear such protective suits? Yes, it will. But the inconveniences from wearing protective suits will be less than female inconveniences from high-heeled shoes, long hair and sun umbrella, etc. And the weak need to wear protective suits only in dangerous environment. In order to get sufficient self-defense ability and stronger survival ability, it is worthy for the weak to endure a little of inconveniences.
Light males and mighty females will take the lead in buying and wearing such protective suits, then more and more females will follow. Once such protective suits become popular, heavy males will be not able to make limbs violence. Tall or strong body shape will be no longer their survival advantage and even be their disadvantage.
People will not adore and aspire for tall and strong body shape any longer. So that all professional sports tournaments such as Football World Cup, NBA, Olympic Games will disappear. The "heavy" sports of high intensity will be substantially modified or disappear. The "light" sports of low intensity will be more popular. Rules of the sports about football, basketball will greatly change to fit the light sports times in future. And table tennis, badminton will be more popular than they are now. Light sports will replace heavy sports, so bones and muscles of our bodies would shrink. We will eat less foods and weight of our bodies will greatly reduce, which will be very conducive to environment protection.

5, wisdomism will replace capitalism.
Wisdom and capital are two backbones of capitalism. Almost all of capitalists grow up from "wisdom creating wealth" to "wisdom and wealth creating wealth".
But the internet has been bringing global wisdom together. Informations and wisdoms flow at unprecedented speeds all over the world, which has been making all of property rights flow more and more frequently between different people. There will never be a capitalist who will be as rich and influential as Bill Gates was, and never be a corporation that will be as influential as Microsoft was, and never be a country that will be as powerful as USA was in 2000.
When flow frequency of most of property rights exceeds a certain critical point, most of people will be fed up with frequent flow of property flow so as to take the way of nationalization to fix the property rights of all of productive assets. We can only rely on our wisdoms to temporarily manage productive assets but can't own them, which is the "wisdomism". Wisdomism will replace capitalism and wisdomists will replace capitalists.
Moreover, if you look at the rich lists of the world in last 20 years, you can find few changes; however, if we create a list of the world's most capable entrepreneurs, it will greatly change every year. Social power of many capitalists surpass their wisdom and contribution for society, because huge capitals owned by super capitalists are huge obstacles to social competitions.
To public ownership, many people think of failing Soviet Union and laggard China. But social systems in Soviet Union and China are both fake public-ownership systems, because Soviet Union and China have no democratic system which is the primary premise of public ownership. Only in democratic society, state-ownership equal public-ownership; otherwise, state-ownership is possibly similar to officials-ownership and breeds serious bureaucratic corruption. The public ownership based on democratic system has never appeared in the world.
In public ownership society of future, the national government that stands for most voters will own all of enterprises, and all voters and all medias can supervise all enterprises. Every industry will need only one large enterprise. Using USA as an example, if the USA government takes over all enterprises, all enterprises about bank, car, energy, software and so on can be merged into "USA Bank, USA Car, USA Energy, USA Software" and so on. National government can establish an enterprises committee to lead and supervise these large enterprises. The CEO of every enterprise should be appointed by the enterprises committee but more than two-thirds of common employees can depose the CEO. In addition, the enterprises committee will manage the innovations funds, similar to current "venture capital funds", to raise innovative projects. We can suppose that the enterprise committee has 99 members, each of whom has $1 billion to approve some innovative projects every year.
Too many trademarks and advertisements overflow everywhere in capitalist society. Even closestools at toilets are branded with trademarks, which is very disgusting. In future society of public ownership, the name of the country will become the only brand of all kinds of products. For example, I mentioned "USA Bank, USA Car, USA Energy, USA Software" just now. So that we will liberate lots of brain cells from remembering lots of trademarks.
All large enterprises will develop and produce different products with different prices according to different people. Quality inspection institutions standing for electors regularly announce quality inspection reports on all kinds of products. So these inspection reports will be more reliable than current advertisements are. We can choose to buy some products according to these inspection reports and products price. All mature products will no longer need any advertisement. Only new products still need advertisements. And only quality inspection institutions have qualification to help enterprises to make true advertisements. So all of existing advertisements will disappear. Amount of future advertisements made by quality inspection institutions will be perhaps 0.01% of amount of existing advertisements. All national enterprises will not compare unrealistically and not attack mutually. Healthy competitions within public enterprises will replace the malignant competitions among existing enterprises.
The government will no longer sell enterprise stocks to anyone so stocks trading will disappear. The public will not spend much time playing with fictitious economy but put more time to real economy. Central cities of fictitious economy such as New York, London and Hongkong will greatly decline.
Governments will take over all of landed estates except owner-occupied housing because earning profit from rental housings is nearly unearned. All of rental housings should be supplied by governments and profit for governments.

6, English will be greatly simplified.
English is the most popular language and it will be likely the only language in future world. But no nation has volunteered giving up its own language and completely accepting English. So existing English is not advanced enough to completely become the world language. We should simplify existing tanglesome English greatly to ease language burden of world people.
The people of every country have special and defective mind-set. The English-speaking people can't fully realize defects of English so they should learn advantages of other languages. Please think about my advices as follows:
(1) Unify all letters and all soundmarks of English, and simplify the forms and pronunciations of all words as follows:
Merge all of similar soundmarks. Merge [a:] and [∧] into [a], i.e. [a:]+[∧]=[a] for short, the same below: [æ]+[e]=[e], [ i:]+[ i ]=[ i ], [כ]+[:כ]=[o], [u:]+ =, [ə:]+[ə]=[ə], [ l ]+[ δ ]=[ l ], [з]+[dз]=[з], [z]+[dz]=[z], [n]+[ŋ]=[n], +[θ]=.
Let " ə, ∫, з " respectively replace the letters " c , x , y " and abolish the letter "q" because there are not the soundmarks " [c], [x], [y] and [q] ".
[ a ], [ ə ], [ e ], [ i ], [ o ], [ u ] will respectively become the pronunciations of the letters a, ə, e, i, o, u in all words. So that there will be respectively 6 vowel letters and 6 single vowels, 19 consonant letters and 19 single consonants. The 25 single soundmarks just match the 25 letters one on one in all words, i.e. every letter has the only pronunciation in all words. There will be not any silent letter in any word. Twenty-five new letters will be:
a, b, ə, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, t, u, v, w, ∫, з, z.
Closed syllables overrun in English. In fact, almost in all words of double syllables or multi-syllables, the consonants at the end of closed syllables, except "n", are not only unnecessary but also difficult to be heard clearly, and therefor should be abolished. But the consonants at the end of single syllable are necessary and should be retained.
We can modify most of words according to above rules. For example, let Inli replace English, i.e. (English, Inli), the same below: (I, Ai) (you, ju) (he, hi) (she, ∫i) (we, wi) (they, lei) (my, mai) (your, jo) (his, hiz) (her, hə) (our, auə) (their, leə),
(who, hu) (what, wot) (why, wai) (where, weə) (which, wit∫) (when, wen),
(America, əmerikə) (Europe, Juərə) (China,T∫ainə) (Russia, Ra∫ə) (Canada, Kenədə) (country, kantri) (oxygen, osiзən) (sure, ∫uə) (president, prezidən) (calculate, kekjulei) (Christmas, krimə) (physics, fizi) (philosophy, filosəfi) (economy, ikonəmi) (anything, enisin) (everything, erisin) (nothing, nasin) (receive, risi) (accept, əse) (study, sdadi) (cable, keibəu) (news, njuz) ("Cable News Network--CNN", "Keibəu Njuz Newə--KNN"),
(one, wan) (two, tu) (three, sri) (four, fo) (five, faiv) (six, siks) (seven, sevən) (eight, eit) (nine, nain) (hundred, handrə) (thousand, sauzən) (million, miljən) (billion, biljən).
We will meet some troubles when we modify monosyllabic words. For example, the pronunciations of "here" and "hear" are both "hiə"; the pronunciations of "two", "too" and "to" are all "tu". Anyhow, we should modify some words to avoid that the different words have the same pronunciation.
(2) abolish all deformations of all verbs completely.
Merge "am, is, are" into "be", and merge "was, were" into "wə". So that the words "am, is, are, was, were" will be abolished.
Let "be do sth" replace "(am, is, are) doing sth", "wə do sth" replace "was (were) doing sth", "did do sth" replace "do-ed sth", "have do sth" replace "have(has) done sth", "had do sth" replace "had done sth", "have be do sth" replace "have(has) been doing sth". Abolish Singular Form in Third Personal of all verbs. So that all verbs in all tenses won't deform any longer.
Let "been do" replace "(am, is, are) done", "will(would) been do" replace "will(would) be done", "have(had) been do" replace "have(had) been done", "wasen do" replace "was(were) done". So that all verbs in passive voice won't deform any longer. Let "do do sth" replace "do doing sth", and "preposition + do sth" replace "preposition + doing sth". For example, let "stop do sth" replace "stop doing sth", and "thank you for help me" replace "thank you for helping me". These changes won't make logic confusion. So that all verbs will no longer deform in any case.
(3) Let "more adj" replace "adj-er or more adj" to express the comparative adjectives of all adjectives. And let "most adj" replace "adj-est or most adj" to express the superlative adjectives of all adjectives. All adverbs obey the same rules. So all of adjectives and adverbs will not deform any longer.
(4) Let "Month1, Month2, Month3, Month4, Month5, Month6, Month7, Month8, Month9, Month10, Month11, Month12" express the 12 months of every year. Let "Week1, Week2, Week3, Week4, Week5, Week6, Week7" respectively replace "Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday".
 
7, disorderly calendar, clock sequence and "QWERTY" keyboard will be improved.
This part contains three of little trends whose resultant force can match one great trend.
(1) Let "365 days = 7 days * 4 weeks * 13 months + 1 day".
In the current disorderly calendar, the questions such as "what day is today?" and "how many days does this month have?" are not easy for us all to answer. These questions cost us many brain cells. If we carry out simple and regular calendar such as " 365 = 7 days * 4 weeks * 13 months + 1 day", lots of our brain cells can be liberated from disorderly calendar to think meaningful things. So that there will be 13 months in a year. Though Christians dislike the number "13", all religions are false heresies and will disappear, and "13" will be accepted by most people in future.
Another way is "365 days = (7 days * 4 weeks+2 days) * 12 months + 5 days". Anyhow, we should make calendar orderly and easy.
(2) Let 6 o'clock become 0 o'clock of every day.
Average sunrise time of 365 days is around 6 o'clock. "tonight" that we call now includes 18:00~24:00 of today and 0:00~6:00 of tomorrow. In 0:00~6:00, most of us are sleeping and the sun has not rised. So current clock sequences are very ridiculous. We should make 6 o'clock become 0 o'clock of every day.
(3) Let simple keyboard replace evil and disorderly "QWERTY" keyboard of computers and mobile phones. The English words starting with a consonant letter are far more than the words starting with a vowel letter. So we usually first use our left hands to input a consonant letter then use our right hand to input a vowel letter. So we should place all vowel letters at the right side of keyboard when we create a new keyboard. And we should change the positions of all letters every 10~20 years according to different operating frequency of different letters.
And we can even take the simplest way to place all of letters on the keyboard according the alphabetical order. Perhaps such "ABCDEF" keyboard is not the best but better than current keyboard.

8, most teaching activities will be done at internet schools.
All of curriculums of social science and all of theory curriculums of science and technology will be transfered to internet schools. Only experiments of science and technology can not be transfered to internet schools so existing schools will only keep laboratories in future. Harvard University will become Harvard Laboratories and Harvard Internet University. We will need at most 10% of existing teachers who will teach students on internet and in laboratories in future. All of us can download the best teaching courseware into our computers and choose the internet schools fitting for us to learn on line. So humans will really enter the era of "lifelong learning". And bandwidth of internet will be increased by dozens of times to hundreds of times to meet "internet schools, home office, internet shopping, internet meeting" in future.

9, the physical laws that can explain all of forces will bring science revolution and molecular foods will bring technology revolution.
The higgs boson is the forefront question of physics. If this particle was proved to exist, the standard model theory based on the 62 kinds of elementary particles will be able to explain the electromagnetic force, strong force and weak force. However, gravitation can't be explained yet. Physicists can never explain gravitation because it does not exist. It's absolutely impossible that there is gravitation between two particles that are 10 light years away from each other.
It's impossible that there are 62 kinds of really elementary particles. Perhaps, there is only one kind of elementary particle, such as photon. Perhaps, the only difference between different objects is mathematics difference, i.e. the different quantities and different spatial structure of photons. If so, physics will become a sub-discipline of mathematics. If not, there are at most three kinds of elementary particles.
Only the universal theories based on 1~3 kinds of elementary particles can explain gravitation and other three kinds of forces. Different from the static gravitation law, the universal theories must be a kind of dynamic collision theories because all of forces are the results of the collisions between elementary particles and all of phenomena in the universe are collisions phenomena. The discovery of the universal theories will be the most profound science revolution.
Once the law of universal gravitation was overthrown, the big bang theory based on the gravitation will be overturned. In fact, the universe has no starting point and end point of time and space. There are always both stars and airs at the same time in the universe. Stars and airs can transform into each other. It's absolutely impossible that there are only stars or airs, so the alleged gravitational singularity (Space-time singularity) that gravitates all of substances in the universe never exist.

Long long ago, animals and primitive people ate uncooked foods and drank unboiled water. Then humans ate cooked foods and drank boiled water, which was an important milestone in human history. Eating accurate molecular foods will be the next milestone in human history. Next technology revolution will must be health revolutions which include technologies about medical equipments, medicaments and molecular foods. And the technology about molecular foods is the most important.
In the future, all of foods that we eat will be purer and purer. All of grains, vegetables and meats will be sent into foods factories then we will industrially extract what our bodies really need: food-grade carbohydrate, protein, fat, vitamin and water.
In further future, we will directly use inorganic substances to synthesize many kinds of carbohydrate, protein, fat and vitamins in foods factories. So that plants and animals will become unnecessary for humans. Planting industry and animal husbandry will become unnecessary and perhaps disappear.
Different individuals choose and eat different combinations of molecular foods according individual body. And medical equipment in future will help us know which and how many molecular foods we need.
In future, everyone who can cook will be a sparetime or professional chemist. At cook house, there will be hundreds of carbohydrates, amino acids, vitamins and fats which can be synthesized into hundreds of foods of different tastes. As we eat less foods but more accurate foods in future, human digestive organs such as stomach, intestines and liver will shrink. And more accurate foods will make us absorb less of harmful substances in human food so that the average life span of humans will greatly increase.

10, the earth federation will appear.
The first global power in human history was Britain, but Britain only won global natural resources. The second one was the USA that not only won global natural resources but also won global top scientists and engineers. But USA has not absorbed global cultural essences. American cultures are variations of European cultures, so there is nothing coming from Asian cultures in American English and American constitution. So, the past Britain and the current USA are both global powers in the narrow sense. The most powerful country in the future world must have absorbed elite talents and cultural essences all over the world. Such country will be the first global power in the broad sense. And this country will lead other countries together to form the earth federation. Which country will it be?
Global wisdoms gathering to USA is the most important reason for USA's powers. But internet has been making wisdoms spreading from USA surpass wisdom gathering to USA. Dynamic balance of wisdoms flow has changed over, so there is no doubt that USA is on the wane. But USA's comprehensive powers based on GDP, military, soft power, science and technology, resources, are still far more powerful than any other country. So it is still possible for USA to become the first global power in the broad sense.
In the next ten years, the main characteristic of world politics will be intense competitions between USA and China. China is like the largest aircraft carrier of the world, and USA is like the most powerful aircraft carrier and also the flagship of the world. China will gain more power, USA and Europe will go into adjustment. But it is very hard for China to become the flagship of the world because China has too heavy population burdens and history burdens to advance quickly.
The biggest weakness of China is its population. The world is not able and not willing to feed more than one billion Chinese as the world feeds Japanese and Koreans, so Chinese have to hold enough cultivated lands to feed themselves. China has few lands except cultivated lands and large wilderness, so China's 1.35 billion people can only have extremely crowded lives of low quality. This seriously hinders Chinese advance. It's absolutely impossible that the China with more than one billion of populations can become a country of high quality, because most people on the earth will need bigger and bigger space for living and working. Maybe the China with about 0.2~0.4 billion of populations will be able to become a country of high quality. So more and more Chinese will go into other countries, but the best way for China to reduce its populations is to give up useless old people as soon as possible.
The biggest weakness of EU is split on language and politics, so Europe will deep decline and the euro zone will likely disintegrate in the next ten years. Europe will experience a painful recession time. But China's mighty rising will be catalyst for European integration, stimulating Europe to unify languages, economies and politics. Running-in of different languages and social systems of Europe will make a super language based on existing English and a super social system which will be popular in the whole Europe or even in the whole world. So disintegrated euro zone will integrate again. Moreover, Europe is nearer to the world center than either of USA and China is, because Mediterranean is the center of human main areas. After Europe experiences the process of "negation of negation", the really unified Europe will challenge leader status of USA.
Internet make wisdoms and powers flow quickly all over the world. So there will be not great nations and races but great territories in future world. Geographical factor will be the most important factor for world politics in future world, so world politics will be closer and closer to world geography. The large countries such as China, EU, Russia, Brazil, Canada and Australia will be more powerful. Russia has the hugest territories across the East and the West, so the future Russia will be perhaps very very powerful. But Japan will continue declining until it is insignificant for the world just like it was insignificant before the 19th Century. Excess populations and conservative thoughts make it difficult for India to become a world power. USA, China, EU, Russia and Brazil will be the top 5 countries in future, but their sequences won't be certain.
Once the first global power in the broad sense appear, other countries will gradually learn and adopt its cultures. So that common interests and sense of identity of most people all over the world will gradually increase, which will make the earth federation ultimately become reality. Global computers network, mobile phones network and traffic network help to promote the formation of the earth federation.
Different people have different living habits but have the same human nature, so there will be the same earth constitution based on the same human nature but different member states will also have different sub-laws based on their different living habits. Current USA federation is a good model of future earth federation.
At last the world will use the same language, the same constitution, the same currency, the same traffic rules and the same telecommunication network so that human efficiency will improve greatly. Mediterranean is center of the world, so some city around Mediterranean will be the capital of the earth federation in future.
 
cool story bro.
 
Holy wall of text.
 
By the time it would take me to read this manic outpouring of speculation, I could probably finish my breakfast, take my shower, jump in my truck, head down to the corner of sixth and Jefferson, flag down a drug dealer there, purchase the appropriate wares, injest them and wait for the effects to kick in that would allow me to really appreciate this posting in proper fashion.
 
Yeah, sure I'm gonna wade through all that, just so this guy can disappear without further comment.

Don't ****ing think so.
 
It's one of the founding principles of the updated edition of the Earth Federation.

Earth Federation? What's that? Actually, don't bother. I think I can live without knowing.
 
Sounds like someone wanting to start there own cult that has attended way too many ComicCons.
 
Star Trek ring a bell? :lol:

That's the United Federation of Planets. They may have mercilessly split infinitives, but even Trekkies would stop short of inventing a word as ugly as 'wisdomism'.
 
Nah.


12345678
 
That's the United Federation of Planets. They may have mercilessly split infinitives, but even Trekkies would stop short of inventing a word as ugly as 'wisdomism'.


Wisdomism on narrow sense is the main principle of No.5 part of my original text. Powers of wisdoms will surpass powers of capitals so wisdomism will replace capitalism.
Wisdomism on broad sense is the main principle of No.1~No.5 and No.10 part of my original text. Powers of wisdoms will surpass powers of religions, families, moralities, limbs forces, capitals and national boundaries.
 
Wisdomism on narrow sense is the main principle of No.5 part of my original text. Powers of wisdoms will surpass powers of capitals so wisdomism will replace capitalism.
Wisdomism on broad sense is the main principle of No.1~No.5 and No.10 part of my original text. Powers of wisdoms will surpass powers of religions, families, moralities, limbs forces, capitals and national boundaries.

And yet, no one has the first clue as to what 'wisdomism' is. You have not explained it at all. There's a history and a body of theory and exposition on what we mean when we discuss capitalism. As far as I can see, the extent of writing on your new ideology is entirely contained in this screed of semi-literate verbiage.

"Wisdomism is the learning of wisdoms in order to achieve the highest level of thinking and living of the society."
Wisdomism

As anyone with a brain can see, that's the ranting of a person with below average grasp of the English language and zero grasp of political philosophy.
 
Small peice of advice for the person starting this. That brain dump of philosophy is great. but the internet is full of people whose brain hurts if they read too much. Don't ask, I cannot explain it either. I am assuming you wish to discuss something long and philisophical. First, you must realize talking to most people on that level is like talking to paint. So see if there is someone around who shows promise wo be able to banter with. Then lead into the debate with smaller chunks. bring the person responding into it rather than just crushing them with a wall of text. remember, if they are actually smart and willing to argue they are probably beating some idiot over the head at the moment and that is a massive block of words.

Oh, and format a bit better. I am not asking you to have perfect grammar, but that formatting thing helps people follow ideas and section them off for a response. Oh, and you probably have better luck in the philosophy forum with this, though i don't see you having much luck in getting a good response around here. I am not sure if there are philosophy boards out there, but you are pretty much fishing a dead pond here for the most part. People are basically looking to argue politics here, and you are trying to start a massive philisophical debate. Good luck with that, I know what you are about to run into.
 
Looks like 1984 to me.

I too stand for world federation but we have to be very careful how it is implemented because the step towards world control is just one.
 
As anyone with a brain can see, that's the ranting of a person with below average grasp of the English language and zero grasp of political philosophy.

Yes, my English is bad because I am a Chinese in China. But I don't think that my philosophy is bad too.
 
Yes, my English is bad because I am a Chinese in China. But I don't think that my philosophy is bad too.

So, that's your website, is it? If so, you need to read up on Utilitarianism and revisit your principles. You also need to write in shorter sentences, shorter paragraphs, use punctuation and cite historical and philosophical premises for what you're arguing. As you can see from this thread, if you write as you did in Post #1, people will think you are a crank and ignore your argument.
 
That's the United Federation of Planets. They may have mercilessly split infinitives, but even Trekkies would stop short of inventing a word as ugly as 'wisdomism'.

Don't boldly go there, andy.

You know full well that you were introduced to the concept of wisdomism when you took that course in existential foolosophy.
 
So, that's your website, is it? If so, you need to read up on Utilitarianism and revisit your principles. You also need to write in shorter sentences, shorter paragraphs, use punctuation and cite historical and philosophical premises for what you're arguing. As you can see from this thread, if you write as you did in Post #1, people will think you are a crank and ignore your argument.

I don't care citing historical and philosophical premises. I only want to write what I think.
Can you tell me which parts of my long text are very very bad in English language?
 
I don't care citing historical and philosophical premises. I only want to write what I think.
So, can you tell me why I should be interested in the unformed and uninformed opinion of someone I don't know? Philosophy and political discourse cannot be separated out from the discourse of its roots and its literature. You may think you've invented something new, but if you were to have studied the work of past (and current) philosophical discourse, you'll see that virtually nothing you could imagine hasn't been imagine and examined before. Of course, you could be the next Wittgenstein or Lao Tzu, but I very much doubt it, based on the content of your posts here.

Can you tell me which parts of my long text are very very bad in English language?

I think I already told you. Your sentences are too long. Your paragraphs are much too long; they make a readers switch off because they just look like a big block of text. No one will read that. I didn't read it all because it looks like a stream of consciousness and that suggests that the person writing it isn't rational or reasonable. Do you know what a 'stream of consciousness' is?
 
Back
Top Bottom