***Try backing up a bit by showing us where Bush lied. All those committees that told him there were WMD in Iraq weren't Bush's direct words. Besides, we did find WMD there, and WMD were not the only reason we entered that war.
Oh jeez, I don't have to use Iraq to get to a lie that killed thousands of honest, hardworking Americans who were risking their lives for others. Let's look at what happened after September 11th, during the cleanup. Everyone who is even semi-informed is aware of what happened. The government let the fire-fighters, police, and volunteers go into a dangerous environment filled with high amounts of contaminants in the air and didn't properly equip or even warn them of the danger, instead just telling them they'd be alright. Well thanks to that, 12,000-some workers and volunteers were subject these dangerous air contaminants and have fallen ill with long-term, lower and upper respiratory problems and other problems linked to the air contaminants, some dying and some already dead.
That alone is an impeachable offense, if you ask me.
But, we also have his constant attacks on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, shown in his many acts and other activities (signing statements redefining laws, claiming that he doesn't have to follow the law, etc) - also very impeachable.
I've brought up DU before, and I'll do it again. Thousands will die from illnesses caused by their own weapons, and our government brought about these deaths knowingly. This is entirely impeachable.
He has spent billions in government money to pay off reporters, journalists, etc.
What more do you want? I didn't even have to go to him lying about WMDs, the Downing Street memos, nothing of the sort. He is impeachable on stuff that is openly admitted.
Plus he never won the 2000 election anyway, so he is an illegal usurper appointed by 9 men in black robes - not elected by the American people.
***The war and Bush's presidency isn't over yet. Despite having 6 years of fighting off the liberal attempt to lose this war--Bush has persevered against all odds.
Liberal attempt to lose this war? Whoa, someone's been drinking too much Kool-Aid.
The Democrats, as I'm assuming that's who you are referring to, didn't stop him from starting this war. They didn't appoint incompetant Secretaries of Defense. They didn't ignore the generals who were telling Bush and Rummy that they needed things. They didn't go in saying 'Bring it on' and thinking it would be a cakewalk with insurgency, or any resistance at all. They didn't claim that the Iraqis would greet us with roses and cheers. They didn't start this unwinnable war.
There is no 'winning' the war in Iraq. We've already lost. We lost the moment we put troops on the ground. Now there are two choices - Continue having soldiers die for a pipe dream and conquest OR leave now and cut our losses.
Remember how the libwerals in Congress tried to handcuff Reagan during his fight against the Communist evil empire?
Yes, because we had to do a lot of 'fighting' for the USSR to collapse on its inefficent, unworkable self. :roll: Reagan didn't beat anybody. He was just in the right place at the right time - and got us a nice debt to go with our celebrations.
Not much difference here with Bush's attempt to keep America free from further enemy assaults, and from further liberal assaults
America free from assaults, huh? Have you read the Patriot Act? Well, I don't expect you to, most of the people who voted on it in Congress didn't read it. How about the Military Commissions Act? How about any of the many freedom-killing bills that Bush has pushed through Congress? No? That's too bad. Read those and get back to me on how 'free' Bush is keeping America.
