• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ted Cruz’s D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES as Phone Records Get Leaked to Media

imyoda

DP Veteran
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,731
Reaction score
1,025
Location
Sarasota, Florida
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
BREAKING: Ted Cruz's D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES As Phone Records Get Leaked To Media
BREAKING: Ted Cruz’s D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES as Phone Records Get Leaked to Media


There appears to have been a data upload to the internet that includes the phone records of the “DC Madam” from 2004-2008, the time frame in which Ted Cruz was said to have been a client of the political prostitute. There are almost 7,400 records

The Gateway Pundit released this statement to the press Tuesday afternoon:

“We have the DC Madam’s phone records. Pages and pages of phone records. We are deciding how to present this evidence.”
All this comes after a story released in tabloids that accused Republican Presidential candidate Ted Cruz of being involved with a high-priced escort for high profile D.C. employees, aptly named the D.C. Madam. Ted Cruz refuted these allegations, saying the story was “all lies,” and that Donald trump was responsible for this rumor starting.

This information could not only ruin Ted Cruz’s chance at a 2016 win, but it could completely destroy his home life, namely his long-time marriage.

“I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not ……….And did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.”
Ted Cruz’s problem is with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while [the National Enquirer was] right about OJ Simpson, John Edwards and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Ted Cruz.”


Read more: Trump: 'Nothing To Do' With National Enquirer Story | The Daily Caller
BREAKING: Ted Cruz's D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES As Phone Records Get Leaked To Media
DCMadam2004-2008_nonames - Pastebin.com
DEVELOPING: We Have the DC Madam's Phone Records - Pages and Pages of Phone Records - The Gateway Pundit
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-mistresses-cheating-claims/
http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/25/trump-says-he-had-nothing-to-do-with-tabloids-cruz-story/
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ht-donald-trump-ted-cruz-kasich-election-2016

Now there seem to be documents........ IMHO the party responsible for this..........is none other than Donald Trump................it has his dirty finger prints all over it........

I don't care who one is.....or what side one i9s on.............this is garbage that should never be aired because it has nothing to due with being qualified for the job
 
If they have the evidence they need to show it or otherwise quit talking about it.
 
BREAKING: Ted Cruz's D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES As Phone Records Get Leaked To Media
BREAKING: Ted Cruz’s D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES as Phone Records Get Leaked to Media


There appears to have been a data upload to the internet that includes the phone records of the “DC Madam” from 2004-2008, the time frame in which Ted Cruz was said to have been a client of the political prostitute. There are almost 7,400 records

The Gateway Pundit released this statement to the press Tuesday afternoon:

“We have the DC Madam’s phone records. Pages and pages of phone records. We are deciding how to present this evidence.”
All this comes after a story released in tabloids that accused Republican Presidential candidate Ted Cruz of being involved with a high-priced escort for high profile D.C. employees, aptly named the D.C. Madam. Ted Cruz refuted these allegations, saying the story was “all lies,” and that Donald trump was responsible for this rumor starting.

This information could not only ruin Ted Cruz’s chance at a 2016 win, but it could completely destroy his home life, namely his long-time marriage.

“I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not ……….And did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.”
Ted Cruz’s problem is with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while [the National Enquirer was] right about OJ Simpson, John Edwards and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Ted Cruz.”


Read more: Trump: 'Nothing To Do' With National Enquirer Story | The Daily Caller
BREAKING: Ted Cruz's D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES As Phone Records Get Leaked To Media
DCMadam2004-2008_nonames - Pastebin.com
DEVELOPING: We Have the DC Madam's Phone Records - Pages and Pages of Phone Records - The Gateway Pundit
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-mistresses-cheating-claims/
http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/25/trump-says-he-had-nothing-to-do-with-tabloids-cruz-story/
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ht-donald-trump-ted-cruz-kasich-election-2016

Now there seem to be documents........ IMHO the party responsible for this..........is none other than Donald Trump................it has his dirty finger prints all over it........

I don't care who one is.....or what side one i9s on.............this is garbage that should never be aired because it has nothing to due with being qualified for the job
I was going to simply dismiss this, but a little research seems to show the Madame's lawyer has been trying to get the courts to allow him to release those records which he has in his possession (and for the reason that he says Cruz was on it).
 
Exactly.

When it comes to these kinds of things, put up or shut up.

I really despise Ted Cruz's politics, but I despise this culture of "destruction by innuendo" even more.
 
I was going to simply dismiss this, but a little research seems to show the Madame's lawyer has been trying to get the courts to allow him to release those records which he has in his possession (and for the reason that he says Cruz was on it).

I wonder when it's going to be leaked..............Maybe sooner than we may think............ because if the drubbing Trump just took..........

I would not be surprised.......and hear The Donald say............those are not my finger prints............:roll:
 
smells like horse****.
 
Cruz was Solicitor General IN TEXAS from 2003-2008, not Washington DC.
 
Ever hear of wasting people's time with sensationalist speculation and absolutely no proof.

Hmmm, I was going to agree with you, but then I remember all the Clinton eruptions that started out as "sensationalist speculation and absolutely no proof". Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Juanita Brodderick...
 
Cruz is slime. Pure and simple. How many of these stories will it take for the true believer t see that their Second Coming was merely coming?
 
I was going to simply dismiss this, but a little research seems to show the Madame's lawyer has been trying to get the courts to allow him to release those records which he has in his possession (and for the reason that he says Cruz was on it).

Just to point out, the lawyer has not said who is on the list. Just that it will effect the presidential race. The source of the hacking , in my opinion, is not reliable. That is not to say that it was or was not Ted Cruz, it is just there is insufficient information at this current time to do anything more than speculate.
 
Just to point out, the lawyer has not said who is on the list. Just that it will effect the presidential race. The source of the hacking , in my opinion, is not reliable. That is not to say that it was or was not Ted Cruz, it is just there is insufficient information at this current time to do anything more than speculate.
Yes, I later found-out Cruz was not specifically named, but rather supposed through the process of analysis.

And you are accurate in that this is a dubious report at this point, including the key individuals (the lawyer, etc) and their motivations.
 
Yeah, but he may have generally solicited in DC during that time frame. ;)

Well, he was in DC before he got married so maybe he did a little "soliciting" then. Whatever the case there just isn't enough information out there to make any case against the guy and this kind of tactic is nothing new. Sara Palin was accused of cheating on her husband. Herman Caine was accused of cheating on his wife. It goes on and on. Sure, every once in a while there's some "there" there but baseless accusations are certainly nothing new.
 
BREAKING: Ted Cruz's D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES As Phone Records Get Leaked To Media
BREAKING: Ted Cruz’s D.C. Madam Scandal EXPLODES as Phone Records Get Leaked to Media


There appears to have been a data upload to the internet that includes the phone records of the “DC Madam” from 2004-2008, the time frame in which Ted Cruz was said to have been a client of the political prostitute. There are almost 7,400 records

The Gateway Pundit released this statement to the press Tuesday afternoon:

“We have the DC Madam’s phone records. Pages and pages of phone records. We are deciding how to present this evidence.”
All this comes after a story released in tabloids that accused Republican Presidential candidate Ted Cruz of being involved with a high-priced escort for high profile D.C. employees, aptly named the D.C. Madam. Ted Cruz refuted these allegations, saying the story was “all lies,” and that Donald trump was responsible for this rumor starting.

This information could not only ruin Ted Cruz’s chance at a 2016 win, but it could completely destroy his home life, namely his long-time marriage.

“I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not ……….And did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.”
Ted Cruz’s problem is with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while [the National Enquirer was] right about OJ Simpson, John Edwards and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Ted Cruz.”


Read more: [...]

Now there seem to be documents........ IMHO the party responsible for this..........is none other than Donald Trump................it has his dirty finger prints all over it........

I don't care who one is.....or what side one i9s on.............this is garbage that should never be aired because it has nothing to due with being qualified for the job

Back on the first.


Prior to NE reporting on the Cuban's Mistress Crisis, Anonymous said because of Cruz's lying, they were going to release information of Cruz and prostitutes unless he left the race.






With the above in mind.


D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race

By Steven Nelson
March 28, 2016, at 2:55 p.m.

A lawyer who represented the so-called “D.C. madam” says he has phone records that could influence the outcome of the presidential election, and he’s threatening to release one or more names on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court if he’s denied a hearing on his right to distribute them.

Montgomery Blair Sibley, the late madam Deborah Palfrey’s colorful attorney, has been subject to a restraining order since 2007 barring him from releasing the information, which he says includes 815 names, addresses and Social Security numbers of Verizon Wireless customers.

[...]

D.C. Madam's Attorney Says Call Log Bombshell Could Upend 2016 Race

One or more?
The lawyer believes a release of the records would have an affect on the outcome of this election/primaries and has petitioned the Court to allow him to release them.
If not, he said he will release them anyways.


A supposed Anonymous related account posted a page of the previously released information from the Madam's records which they think is linked to Cruz.
0 @Hour1
 
Unless and until there is proof the rumor should be categorized as political desperation.

Cruz is not going to become the president. Not going to happen. There is no way in hell most Independents, Democrats and Republicans Without a Party (RWP) are going to vote for Cruz, whores in the closet or not. Cruz in no way appeals to anyone other than Christian theocrats, Teabaggers and balls deep Republican partisans. He cannot win the general election.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the rumors prove to be true. If they are true then über family values Ted, God's chosen candidate, Mr. American Family Man, the Reverend's son, husband of the wife who sees God's face all the time, deserves whatever press he receives.
 
Unless and until there is proof the rumor should be categorized as political desperation.

Cruz is not going to become the president. Not going to happen. There is no way in hell most Independents, Democrats and Republicans Without a Party (RWP) are going to vote for Cruz, whores in the closet or not. Cruz in no way appeals to anyone other than Christian theocrats, Teabaggers and balls deep Republican partisans. He cannot win the general election.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the rumors prove to be true. If they are true then über family values Ted, God's chosen candidate, Mr. American Family Man, the Reverend's son, husband of the wife who sees God's face all the time, deserves whatever press he receives.

Why does it seem that the more loudly one screams "family values" the more likely it is one doesn't practise those values?
 
Just to point out, the lawyer has not said who is on the list. Just that it will effect the presidential race. The source of the hacking , in my opinion, is not reliable. That is not to say that it was or was not Ted Cruz, it is just there is insufficient information at this current time to do anything more than speculate.

So then you're suggesting Hillary? There have been lotsa rumors from her college days.
 
Why does it seem that the more loudly one screams "family values" the more likely it is one doesn't practise those values?

That's a good question and there are good answers and bad. One of the good ones is that we are all sinners, and even the family values set realize this. So the folks that support family values candidates do not expect these folks to be without sin. What matters to them is the lying and the hiding of it. Confession and contrition are what they expect from such a candidate. Lyin Ted isn't going to do that, he'll go the Nixon route.
 
So then you're suggesting Hillary? There have been lotsa rumors from her college days.

Hey, I can't rule anybody out... including the possibility that, well, it's one big lie, and it's actually no one. The person who is the ex-lawyer does not seem too .. stable to me. He did have access to the records, so it's anybody's guess. And, when push comes to shove, the question that is important is 'did this effect the persons voting record and his/her oath of office'?? If no, then I really don't give a darn.
 
Back
Top Bottom