• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Teaching Liblosers to WIN! (1 Viewer)

ptsdkid

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
10
Location
New Hampshire
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
First, let me thank the honorable Simon Moon for allowing me to use the term ‘LIBLOSER’ up here in the hayloft of ideas and of constructive political enlightenment. Libloser can only be a derogatory term if you let it consume your every thought, ideals and ideologies, and if you don’t take immediate action to wean from the scourge so as to join with the winning team.

I wasn’t quite sure whether to submit this post to the election forum, or some kind of psychology forum. My effort here is to teach liberals how to stop losing elections, as well as to teach them the psychological benefits that come with being a winner.

Some may say that my sharing a political acumen of winning conservative strategies to a libloser crowd would be an act of compromising myself into an untenable position. That may be, but my focus will be more on highlighting the past and present libloser formula of losing. My humanitarian/compassion side has always trumped any notion to a selfish political objective. Simply put, I want all Americans (including the congenital losers) to seek and enjoy the common thread of winning, that we conservatives have held so dear to our heart.

We’ve already seen and proven that liberals are more apt to lose in competitive sports; always lose as candidates for president; are angrier than conservatives; have a congenital aura of unhappiness about them; die at an earlier age than conservatives; often die alone; are more apt to divorce and experiment with mind altering drugs than conservatives; more apt to delve into the occult, free love, and sodomy then would a conservative; and more apt to forfeit a chance at personal peace and love with God, in lieu of taking a shaky ride on that secular pagan train toward chronic unhappiness and sin.

One reason liberals are losers, is because competition in sports, in academia, and in every phase of their lives was frowned upon from adolescence to adulthood. Liberals couldn’t accept the humiliation of losing a race in track, or losing any sporting competition, or of flunking a subject in school, or competing against others in the workplace where the outcome of winning would result in progressing and succeeding over that of another. The fact that liberals always lost, or were afraid of losing, or were afraid of bettering someone else, is seen in their political outlook of today.

Schools have to have an outcome based grading system where no one fails so as not to psychologically damage poor Johnny--who would have otherwise failed the test. High school and elementary schools are gearing toward having a no-loser system for their sports curriculum. You don’t need to come in first to become a winner. Now you can come in last and receive an honorable mention for putting forth a valiant effort.

Liberally initiated quota systems ensure that the least qualified will receive the job. What better way to inculcate a sense of responsibility and diligence into a young American, than by guaranteeing him that he need not learn, strive or compete for a job. This liberal initiative only sets the subject up for failure in the future. At that point, teaching an old dog new tricks will become moot. Liberals call the quota system ….‘evening the playing field’, I call it ’softening your backbone and determination to succeed’.

I listed some of these losing traits of a liberal and his mindset, with the hope that each one of you will change your thinking and policy so as to join with we conservatives on the winning team.

Here’s how you start toward joining the winning team:

Stop bashing George Bush, Christianity and the Republican administration’s efforts to turn back or defeat terrorism. You losers fought Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, only to see Ronnie win record breaking landslides against Mondale and Carter, and to see Ronnie put the evil empire into the trash bin of history.

So with history repeating itself, and liblosers still bashing and undermining the efforts of the Bush administration, and with over 90% of American counties still voting red, and still upholding their Christian/Conservative beliefs, my plea for you liblosers to smarten up here by changing colors to the red team is and should be duly noted and documented. The only other option you might possibly have to change from loser to winner--would be to come up with a Democratic plan of action that would better protect us from terrorism, and trump our present day economic boom. Neither you nor I believe that would or could happen. Come on, even I get tired of calling you people losers.

Btw, I just hit the winning numbers on a $20,000 scratch ticket in Massachusetts. Its hard to shake that ‘winning’ label when you’ve been blessed with membership on a winning team for so long.
 
Oh my lord! The scales have fallen from my eyes! Why didn’t I see this earlier!
Ptsdkid, your words have revealed the true word to me! Why didn’t I see that Bush does poop golden nuggets! No longer will I doubt the spoken word of Bush or his minions. I am sorry for ever doubting you, oh enlightened one! Please, if I could just be near you, ptsdkid, and your words of historic wisdom, I will once again be a winner! From this point forward let this be my mantra; VOTE REPUBLICAN, IT’S EASIER THAN THINKING!!
 
Paladin said:
Oh my lord! The scales have fallen from my eyes! Why didn’t I see this earlier!
Ptsdkid, your words have revealed the true word to me! Why didn’t I see that Bush does poop golden nuggets! No longer will I doubt the spoken word of Bush or his minions. I am sorry for ever doubting you, oh enlightened one! Please, if I could just be near you, ptsdkid, and your words of historic wisdom, I will once again be a winner! From this point forward let this be my mantra; VOTE REPUBLICAN, IT’S EASIER THAN THINKING!!


***I'm sorry that you had ever doubted me in the first place. You must be new here. Stick around if you would like to be inundated with more words of wisdom. I can also understand your need to be near me. Having a positive winning attitude to rub off on others is my small gift to mankind. Jesus said to spread the wealth. I am but a mere mortal carrying out his wishes. Happiness and contentment in life is deeply rooted in those calling themself Conservatives.
 
ptsdkid said:
***I'm sorry that you had ever doubted me in the first place. You must be new here. Stick around if you would like to be inundated with more words of wisdom. I can also understand your need to be near me. Having a positive winning attitude to rub off on others is my small gift to mankind. Jesus said to spread the wealth. I am but a mere mortal carrying out his wishes.

:D :D Good! You had fun with my response! I find that a lot of cons won't and don't.

ptsdkid said:
Happiness and contentment in life is deeply rooted in those calling themself Conservatives.

Also in a few of us who call themselves Liberals. ;)
ted
 
We’ve already seen and proven that liberals are more apt to lose in competitive sports; always lose as candidates for president; are angrier than conservatives; have a congenital aura of unhappiness about them; die at an earlier age than conservatives; often die alone; are more apt to divorce and experiment with mind altering drugs than conservatives; more apt to delve into the occult, free love, and sodomy then would a conservative; and more apt to forfeit a chance at personal peace and love with God, in lieu of taking a shaky ride on that secular pagan train toward chronic unhappiness and sin.

This is the biggest pile of ***** I have read here yet.
 
::Major_Baker:: said:
This is the biggest pile of ***** I have read here yet.


***One could only surmise that you're in total agreement with my theme of liblosers. Please allow me to substitute the word 'facts' for your asterisk portion above. Since when has the mod team deleted that word?
 
ptsdkid said:
First, let me thank the honorable Simon Moon for allowing me to use the term ‘LIBLOSER’ up here in the hayloft of ideas and of constructive political enlightenment. Libloser can only be a derogatory term if you let it consume your every thought, ideals and ideologies, and if you don’t take immediate action to wean from the scourge so as to join with the winning team.

I wasn’t quite sure whether to submit this post to the election forum, or some kind of psychology forum. My effort here is to teach liberals how to stop losing elections, as well as to teach them the psychological benefits that come with being a winner.

Some may say that my sharing a political acumen of winning conservative strategies to a libloser crowd would be an act of compromising myself into an untenable position. That may be, but my focus will be more on highlighting the past and present libloser formula of losing. My humanitarian/compassion side has always trumped any notion to a selfish political objective. Simply put, I want all Americans (including the congenital losers) to seek and enjoy the common thread of winning, that we conservatives have held so dear to our heart.

We’ve already seen and proven that liberals are more apt to lose in competitive sports; always lose as candidates for president; are angrier than conservatives; have a congenital aura of unhappiness about them; die at an earlier age than conservatives; often die alone; are more apt to divorce and experiment with mind altering drugs than conservatives; more apt to delve into the occult, free love, and sodomy then would a conservative; and more apt to forfeit a chance at personal peace and love with God, in lieu of taking a shaky ride on that secular pagan train toward chronic unhappiness and sin.

One reason liberals are losers, is because competition in sports, in academia, and in every phase of their lives was frowned upon from adolescence to adulthood. Liberals couldn’t accept the humiliation of losing a race in track, or losing any sporting competition, or of flunking a subject in school, or competing against others in the workplace where the outcome of winning would result in progressing and succeeding over that of another. The fact that liberals always lost, or were afraid of losing, or were afraid of bettering someone else, is seen in their political outlook of today.

Schools have to have an outcome based grading system where no one fails so as not to psychologically damage poor Johnny--who would have otherwise failed the test. High school and elementary schools are gearing toward having a no-loser system for their sports curriculum. You don’t need to come in first to become a winner. Now you can come in last and receive an honorable mention for putting forth a valiant effort.

Liberally initiated quota systems ensure that the least qualified will receive the job. What better way to inculcate a sense of responsibility and diligence into a young American, than by guaranteeing him that he need not learn, strive or compete for a job. This liberal initiative only sets the subject up for failure in the future. At that point, teaching an old dog new tricks will become moot. Liberals call the quota system ….‘evening the playing field’, I call it ’softening your backbone and determination to succeed’.

I listed some of these losing traits of a liberal and his mindset, with the hope that each one of you will change your thinking and policy so as to join with we conservatives on the winning team.

Here’s how you start toward joining the winning team:

Stop bashing George Bush, Christianity and the Republican administration’s efforts to turn back or defeat terrorism. You losers fought Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, only to see Ronnie win record breaking landslides against Mondale and Carter, and to see Ronnie put the evil empire into the trash bin of history.

So with history repeating itself, and liblosers still bashing and undermining the efforts of the Bush administration, and with over 90% of American counties still voting red, and still upholding their Christian/Conservative beliefs, my plea for you liblosers to smarten up here by changing colors to the red team is and should be duly noted and documented. The only other option you might possibly have to change from loser to winner--would be to come up with a Democratic plan of action that would better protect us from terrorism, and trump our present day economic boom. Neither you nor I believe that would or could happen. Come on, even I get tired of calling you people losers.

Btw, I just hit the winning numbers on a $20,000 scratch ticket in Massachusetts. Its hard to shake that ‘winning’ label when you’ve been blessed with membership on a winning team for so long.

Having read some of your posts, I recognize your Mark Gastineau view of the world and debating style -- and I recognize that in your face winning is about the only message that younger folks get from learning about life from watching pro sports.

But has the concept "it's not whether you win or lose but how you play the game" ever been mentioned to you? How about the concept of good sportsmanship?

Do you run up the score as high as possible on the other guy? Do you figure it is OK to cheat to win? Does the ends justify the means in your world? As long as you can feel like you "won" nothing else matters?
 
ptsdkid said:
***One could only surmise that you're in total agreement with my theme of liblosers. Please allow me to substitute the word 'facts' for your asterisk portion above. Since when has the mod team deleted that word?

Can you prove any of these claims, or are they merely 'chesswarsnow' facts?

[liberals] are more apt to divorce and experiment with mind altering drugs than conservatives;
Well,...the mind altering drugs claim I'll buy. As they say, liberals have more fun;)
You guys just drink instead....:lol:
Liberals more apt to divorce? Why the higher divorce rate in the bible belt then?
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/social/pd111999g.html
 
One has to be a complete and utter moron to look at the political climate in the last 100 years and claim liberals are losing.

Republican politicians know the truth. you don't win elections without taking a liberal slant on what the role of goverment actually is.
 
zymurgy said:
One has to be a complete and utter moron to look at the political climate in the last 100 years and claim liberals are losing.

Republican politicians know the truth. you don't win elections without taking a liberal slant on what the role of goverment actually is.
It is a silly thread premise, to be sure.
There are whole paragraphs that can be debunked with solid evidence. There are specualations, generalizations, and downright BS.

Hard to believe that the poster is a 56 year old man.

BTW, kid, do you really have PTSD?
Or is that a front?
 
ptsdkid said:
We’ve already seen and proven that liberals are more apt to lose in competitive sports; always lose as candidates for president; are angrier than conservatives; have a congenital aura of unhappiness about them; die at an earlier age than conservatives; often die alone; are more apt to divorce and experiment with mind altering drugs than conservatives; more apt to delve into the occult, free love, and sodomy then would a conservative; and more apt to forfeit a chance at personal peace and love with God, in lieu of taking a shaky ride on that secular pagan train toward chronic unhappiness and sin..
Ah yes. Your shining example of peace and love has inspired us all.

ptsdkid said:
One reason liberals are losers, is because competition in sports, in academia, and in every phase of their lives was frowned upon from adolescence to adulthood. Liberals couldn’t accept the humiliation of losing a race in track, or losing any sporting competition, or of flunking a subject in school, or competing against others in the workplace where the outcome of winning would result in progressing and succeeding over that of another. The fact that liberals always lost, or were afraid of losing, or were afraid of bettering someone else, is seen in their political outlook of today.
Why does the fable "Tortoise and the Hare" suddenly come to mind?

ptsdkid said:
Here’s how you start toward joining the winning team:

Stop bashing George Bush, Christianity and the Republican administration’s efforts to turn back or defeat terrorism. You losers fought Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, only to see Ronnie win record breaking landslides against Mondale and Carter, and to see Ronnie put the evil empire into the trash bin of history.
I remember now why Christianity lost its appeal. Jesus kept calling people losers.

ptsdkid said:
So with history repeating itself, and liblosers still bashing and undermining the efforts of the Bush administration, and with over 90% of American counties still voting red, and still upholding their Christian/Conservative beliefs, my plea for you liblosers to smarten up here by changing colors to the red team is and should be duly noted and documented. The only other option you might possibly have to change from loser to winner--would be to come up with a Democratic plan of action that would better protect us from terrorism, and trump our present day economic boom. Neither you nor I believe that would or could happen. Come on, even I get tired of calling you people losers.
No you don't.

ptsdkid said:
Btw, I just hit the winning numbers on a $20,000 scratch ticket in Massachusetts. Its hard to shake that ‘winning’ label when you’ve been blessed with membership on a winning team for so long.
That's cool. I'm not religious at all, but if I had to choose, I think I'd rather be a member of the "Jesus' Losers Club" than the "Christian Winners Society". The philosophy of Jesus shows him to be a man who was more interested in helping the Losers than the zealous Winners.
 
ptsdkid said:
Btw, I just hit the winning numbers on a $20,000 scratch ticket in Massachusetts. Its hard to shake that ‘winning’ label when you’ve been blessed with membership on a winning team for so long.
ptsdkid, what you fail to realize that that there is no *true* line between a Liberal and a Conservative. There are Conservatives that vote Democrat, believe that red ink harms children, and think Clinton was the best president we have ever had. I am definitely not one of those and understand your position, but your claim is flawed. There is no *true* Liberal mentality. There are Liberals against red ink and voted for President Bush. :shock:

I would guess that there is not one Liberal on this forum that believes in *every* cause or blankets an entire mindset. Equally, I would guess that there is not one Conservatives that fits the cast as well. You may think you do, but I would bet that we could find a topic that you break the mold even if it is ever so slightly.

Did you know that most people vote party ticket regardless of the issues? Did you know there are a significant amount of Republicans in office that are *for* abortion? Equally there are Democrats against it. Isn't that an oxymoron? Aren't all Liberals pro-choice? Blah!

This is not a black and white issue. This is not something that can be claimed and held up to a Rush Limbaugh standard. This is no *true* border between Republicans/Democrats or Liberals/Conservatives - that is the point.

This is the very reason most of us are here. Every issue has a multiple. Every issue has potential outcomes and events. Every issue is up for grabs. Whether you believe it or not there are as many "Conserloosers" as Libloosers. The true issue is laziness.
 
Last edited:
Are the mods here simply worn down by this incessant trolling and that is why this thread is not down in the basement? Looks like this obsessive dedication to trolling pays off, if so.

If you don't succeed the first 500 times, just keep posting the same drivel ad nauseum.........
 
Gardener said:
Are the mods here simply worn down by this incessant trolling and that is why this thread is not down in the basement? Looks like this obsessive dedication to trolling pays off, if so.

If you don't succeed the first 500 times, just keep posting the same drivel ad nauseum.........
Aaaaahhhh..I've been away for 3 months and I see very little if anything has changed when it comes to bashing people whose views one disagrees with.

Interestingly all of the things that we "Liberals" are accused of being are, if you untwist the bs rhetoric and avoid reading the rage stuff what we Liberal Democrats want to be and most times what Republcans are not, namely:

Pro-Choice
Pro-Gay Marriage
Pro-Education
Pro-Environment
Anti-Iraq War
Anti-Unwarranted Domestic Spying
and most importantly ANTI-BUSH...

So welcome me back to the fold, isn't it swell to have another Liberal voice to defend freedom?

:2party:
 
Welcome back, 26X's.

See you in the World Series.

pMLB2-1315613dt.jpg
 
ptsdkid said:
First, let me thank the honorable Simon Moon for allowing me to use the term ‘LIBLOSER’ up here in the hayloft of ideas and of constructive political enlightenment.
Actually, I did no such thing. I merely struggled patiently (and possibly in vain?) to explain the rules of DP to you.

ptsdkid said:
Libloser can only be a derogatory term if you let it consume your every thought, ideals and ideologies, and if you don’t take immediate action to wean from the scourge so as to join with the winning team.
Actually, libloser is an inherently derogatory term that, by your own admission, was designed to inflame. And, as such, is a crude appeal to emotion rather than anything having to do with ideas, enlightenment, ideals or ideology.

ptsdkid said:
My humanitarian/compassion side has always trumped any notion to a selfish political objective. Simply put, I want all Americans (including the congenital losers) to seek and enjoy the common thread of winning, that we conservatives have held so dear to our heart.
Hogwash. This is just another one of your pathetically predictable slam threads. Yet another in a long line of your threads that can be succintly and entirely summed up w/ the slogan, "We rule, they drool." It has nary a thing to do with any compassion on your part.

ptsdkid said:
...always lose as candidates for president...
Now you're on about how Carter and Clinton et al were conservatives. :rolleyes:

ptsdkid said:
Christian/Conservative beliefs, my plea for you liblosers to smarten up here by changing colors to the red team is and should be duly noted and documented.
Come on, even I get tired of calling you people losers.
As I extensively explained at great length and in great detail, name-calling directed at your fellow DP members is against the rules.
I'm not sure how to make this any more clear. Perhaps someone else can help you with this ostensibly simple concept. What part do you find difficult to comprehend?

Even though I have my serious doubts about the truth of it, you have attempted to portray the kinds of name calling and grade school discourse that you limit yourself to as a highwater mark of your intellectual capacity, calling it your genius.
While I do not agree with your assessment of your intellectual capacity, ( I think you're capable of much more than you ay you are), your repeated (and quite possibly deliberate) failure to grasp the concept of civil debate is putting you at a great disadvantage.

Unless you're deliberately disregarding the various exhortations to conduct yourself in a civil manner, I'm asking that you please study the rules of DP and ask for guidance from a mod team member about any parts you don't understand or feel comfortable with.
If your lack of civil discourse is the result of an unwillingness rather than an inability, I ask that you limit your uncivil discourse to the Basement or other parts of the www.
 
Last edited:
Simon W. Moon said:
Actually, libloser is an inherently derogatory term that, by your own admission, was designed to inflame. And, as such, is a crude appeal to emotion rather than anything having to do with ideas, enlightenment, ideals or ideology.

That right there pretty much Sums up everthing this member types into the forum......
 
Simon W. Moon said:
Actually, libloser is an inherently derogatory term that, by your own admission, was designed to inflame. And, as such, is a crude appeal to emotion rather than anything having to do with ideas, enlightenment, ideals or ideology.


***If the term 'Libloser' is derogatory, then one would think that those feeling the gyst of it's portrayal to them personally would want to disclaim the label with everything in their arsenal. To do so would be honoring the very act of debating....which in essence is the purpose behind this forum. I have cited many examples proving that liberals and their agenda(s) have failed, thus the reason for the tetrm 'libloser'. Every other posting on this forum has personal opinions of very partisan individuals...does it not? Why is my opinion any different than someone elses? I am using the libloser term in generalities involving an entire group of people, or an entire ideology. I'm not singiling out anyone here other than non members like the failed liberal contenders for presidency. Surely there are a lot more derogatory terms being bandied about here. And is 'inflame' any more egregious a term than to 'incite' or 'provoke' the passion of another? You people act like the creative word 'libloser' is some kind of vicious profanity.

This civil manner you talk about is exactly the way I conduct myself here. I went to lengths to describe (my opinion) as to why liberals are losers. So these are not just some kind of schoolyard bullying so as to get one up on someone with a differing ideology. My intention here (in a civil way) is to get others (generally liberals) to explain to us why they uphold a losing ideology.

If the term libloser was so outrageous, then why didn't you either suspend me, ban me, or place the thread in the basement in the first place?

I think if you and other moderators were to grasp what I'm saying with an open mind--you would soon come to realize that continuing to fight me on these frivolous points of minutiae is robbing the forum of a great potential future.

Perhaps I should get permission from you Mr. Moon before posting my next topic. I'm contemplating using the title 'Liberalism is a Mental Disorder' for my next one. Would this one meet the forum's standards? I'll be explaining why liberalism is a disorder by citing examples with a general overview. I will not, or I would refrain from citing individual examples so as to please the forum team. What say you Mr. Moon, do I have have your permission to unload that beauty?
 
ptsdkid said:
Perhaps I should get permission from you Mr. Moon before posting my next topic. I'm contemplating using the title 'Liberalism is a Mental Disorder' for my next one. Would this one meet the forum's standards? I'll be explaining why liberalism is a disorder by citing examples with a general overview. I will not, or I would refrain from citing individual examples so as to please the forum team. What say you Mr. Moon, do I have have your permission to unload that beauty?
ptsdkid, your digging yourself a hole and its making us conservatives look bad. Try attacking a topic rather than a group of people. In case you havn't noticed, this thread has had little views and replies compared to other topics that have quality content.

Champs! Welcome back. :)
 
vauge said:
ptsdkid, your digging yourself a hole and its making us conservatives look bad. Try attacking a topic rather than a group of people. In case you havn't noticed, this thread has had little views and replies compared to other topics that have quality content.

Champs! Welcome back. :)


***Just how am I making Conservatives look bad? If liberalism isn't a political topic, then please tell me what is. I didn't realize that it was a contest to attract the most viewers.

Lack of quality content comes from liberalism and those aspiring to it's tenets. I have yet to see a liberal defend his ideology, thus the reason I harp on this libloser theme. You know yourself that liberals love to bash Conservatism, love to bash our president and this administration, but come up lame and ineffective in defending their own political principles. I'm just trying to even out the playing field here. Where's the harm in getting liberals to belly up to the political podium?
 
ptsdkid said:
***Just how am I making Conservatives look bad? If liberalism isn't a political topic, then please tell me what is. I didn't realize that it was a contest to attract the most viewers.
Your not listening man. We are a topical forum - it's not *us* against *them*. We are here to find out WHY folks think the way they do (including Liberals) so we can discuss it and hopefully give them something to think about. Or, possibly even learn something ourselves. This is not a penis contest.

Liberalism exists unfortunately. I too believe that it is killing America. But it is not a pure mindset or a way of life. Every topic has different views. A Conservative trends toward a specific way and a Liberal trends toward another. Snag those topics - debate them. Your blanket statement of Liberalism being a mental disorder is as pathetic as me saying that Sprite is gross. However, if you were to convince me to say that it is gross because of the lime flavor - you would understand more and maybe advise me to try 7up instead. (for the record, I like Sprite)

Yes, you have many claims. Many - maybe even all - are true, quite a bit of Liberals seem to think in a certain way and both of us simply cannot fathom it. Engage those topics - find out *WHY*. Find those lime flavored issues. Learn how the Conservatives have failed to get the message across or how we have failed to keep the message. Find a new angle and you just might find more folks interested in what you have to say.

ptsdkid said:
Lack of quality content comes from liberalism and those aspiring to it's tenets. I have yet to see a liberal defend his ideology, thus the reason I harp on this libloser theme.
Again, you are not listening. Engage the individual topics and you will find what you seek.
I promise.

ptsdkid said:
You know yourself that liberals love to bash Conservatism, love to bash our president and this administration, but come up lame and ineffective in defending their own political principles. I'm just trying to even out the playing field here. Where's the harm in getting liberals to belly up to the political podium?
They do. Again, you want a winner take all thread, and it simply will not happen here. Many of us agree with your position on quite a bit of topics. You haven't had the shock yet. You need that spark. I beseech you again, engage topically and you might find someone whom you believe to be a radical agreeing with you.

If you want a winner take all thread - you might consider another forum. That goes for Liberals with the same agenda.
 
Last edited:
Still wondering:
so do you really suffer form PTSD. or are you just asking for attention?
 
ptsdkid said:
***Just how am I making Conservatives look bad?

Much like Moore makes the liberals look bad I suppose. You see, when you come in here with all those opinions of yours and label yourself as conservative, that makes them all look stupid. Speak for yourself. That limits the embarrassment to only one individual that way.

Have a nice day.
 
ptsdkid said:
***If the term 'Libloser' is derogatory, then one would think that those feeling the gyst of it's portrayal to them personally would want to disclaim the label with everything in their arsenal.
Perhaps if that one was you or someone else finds name-calling to be genius. Many folks have something better to do. Many folks desire something more from their political discourse than playground dialogue.
Obviously, you don't. Please confine these sorts of simplisms and "we rule they drool" rants to the Basement.

ptsdkid said:
To do so would be honoring the very act of debating....which in essence is the purpose behind this forum.
Actually it does no such thing.
However, I'm not here to try and change you mind as to what does and does not constitute civil political debate. I'm just here to tell you about how things are here at DP. Once you have you own political debate forum, you may decide that debate is whatever you'd like it to be. However, DP already has guidelines as to what constitutes civil debate.
The entirety of the Mod Team up to and including the site admin and owner have considered your points re what civil debate means. And, mene, mene, tekel, upharsin, your view point has been counted, weighed and found wanting. Your kingdom of posts will be divided.
Those that adhere to DP's guidelines [not your own private ones] will be allowed to remain in the regular fora. Those that do not conform to DP's guidelines [even though they may conform to yours] of debate will be closed and/or sent to the Basement where such conduct is acceptable.

That's how it is.

Nothing will be changed by the repetition of your arguments that have previously been unanimously rejected on multiple occasions about why DP guidelines are in error on this issue. Your arguments have already been considered multiple times at length and rejected.

You can continue deliberately violate DP guidelines and accept the inevitable consequences. Or you can deal with the fact that DP guidelines do not conform to your wishes by starting your "we rule, they drool threads" in the Basement or by following DP's guidelines re civil debates.



Sincerely,



SWM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom