• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Taxpayers Sued by Schools.

Squawker

Professor
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
4
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
We pay taxes to have educated people teach our children. Should we be sued because we don’t pay “extra” for them to do their job? The no child left behind act was designed to force schools to give our children a “basic” education, so they could pass a standard test. What these Schools/Teachers are really saying is, “I don’t want to be held accountable”.


Apr 20, 2:39 PM (ET)

By The Associated Press
Details of the No Child Left Behind Act lawsuit, Pontiac v. Spellings, filed Wednesday:
Plaintiffs: Pontiac School District in Michigan; Laredo Independent School District in Texas; Leicester Town School District, Neshobe Elementary School District, Otter Valley Union High School District, Rutland Northeast Supervisory Union, Pittsford Town School District, Sudbury Town School District and Whiting Town School District in Vermont; National Education Association and its affiliates in Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Texas, Utah, Vermont and Reading, Pa.
Defendant: Margaret Spellings, in her capacity as secretary of the Department of Education.
Key section of the law in question: Section 9527(a), which says nothing in the law authorizes the federal government to "mandate a state or subdivision thereof to spend any funds or incur any costs not paid for under this Act."
Claim: Spellings has violated the law and the U.S. Constitution by requiring school districts to comply with the law despite "multibillion dollar national funding shortfalls."
Remedy sought: A court order that states and school districts are not required to spend their own money (the peoples money who pay for a service)to comply with the mandates of the federal law, and that the Education Department may not withhold federal money from states that refuse to comply on such grounds.
Source
 

Fantasea

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
3,692
Reaction score
8
Squawker said:
We pay taxes to have educated people teach our children. Should we be sued because we don’t pay “extra” for them to do their job? The no child left behind act was designed to force schools to give our children a “basic” education, so they could pass a standard test. What these Schools/Teachers are really saying is, “I don’t want to be held accountable”.



Source
Of course. When have public schools ever been accountable for anything. Year after year, they turn out an inferior product and year after year, they get more money.

Now, they see the handwriting on the wall and they don't like what it says. As it is to be expected, the socialist-lib-dem controlling National Education Association is up to its eyeballs in the lawsuit.

When they're asked to put up or else, they become belligerent. Gall?

This would be a great time to greatly expand the use of Supreme Court approved school vouchers to let kids opt out of lousy schools.
 
Top Bottom